Myron Gaines x Candace Owens

Candace Owens posits that modern feminism was not an organic movement for equality but a covert operation sponsored by the CIA and men in government (many allegedly homosexual). The primary goals, she claims, were twofold: to enable the taxation of two-income households and to remove children from parental influence, placing them under government control through extended schooling and activities, thereby controlling their minds. She traces this ideology back to figures like Emma Goldman and Margaret Sanger, linking it to radical communist movements aimed at overthrowing family institutions.

Owens states, 'This was a CIA sponsored SCOP. Um it Gloria Steinum was sponsored by the CIA. Okay. These protests were sponsored by men in government. Um a lot of them homosexual actually. And the reason for that was simply because they wanted to tax to it was actually twofold I would say. They wanted to tax uh households household income both ways. And also they wanted women to instead of focusing on their kids... they wanted to remove that and to have the children given to the government for six hours a day beyond six hours a day... which gives the government full control over the minds of the children.'

Owens asserts that Charlie Kirk's death was not an accident but a 'military hit,' although she does not yet know who ordered it. She bases this on what she describes as 'impossible things' being told by those around him, including Christian Zionists and Turning Point employees, who she claims are actively lying about the circumstances, his faith journey, and his changing stance on the pro-Israel cause. She highlights a text message from Kirk stating 'They are going to kill me' the day before his death, which she believes was not referring to the 'trans lobby.'

Owens states, 'I can tell you that I view the Charlie Crick assassination as a military hit. I do not know who called the hit yet, but it's it's military. There's no question in my mind that it was a military.' She later adds, 'I know for a fact one of them... has a text message from Charlie the day before he died saying, 'They are going to kill me.''

Owens details how her questioning of Israel and the 'Zionist lobby' led to her firing from Daily Wire, demonetization on YouTube, and a ban from Australia. She describes these actions as a 'full-court press effort' to silence dissent, involving mass reporting, public threats, and lawsuits. She argues that the lobby 'requires censorship' to maintain its perceived power and that attempts to 'deplatform' individuals ultimately backfire by drawing more attention to their message.

Owens recounts, 'I was fired in what was it? March of 2024 and I obviously was very surprised about it.' She attributes this to her discussions about Jews and a 'chuch-ching' sound effect. Later, she states, 'They forcefired Tucker. They forcefired me. And then they realized, oh, we don't we can't control them.' She also mentions, 'They successfully got me banned [from Australia]... they decided that I am too dangerous to speak in their country.'

Candace Owens expresses her belief that the MeToo movement, as exemplified by the Harvey Weinstein case, represents 'hostile takeovers of companies.' She argues that Weinstein was wrongly imprisoned and that the media effectively used psychological manipulation to convince the public of his guilt without sufficient evidence. She sees this as a dangerous precedent where individuals and their companies can be targeted and destroyed through false accusations and corrupted court systems.

Owens states, 'I think me too, what it represented was hostile takeovers of comp of companies. That's kind of a theme, right? If you start to go back, you look at from Michael Jackson to Kanye to Britney Spears, these are hostile takeovers of companies.' She adds, 'There is no question that Harvey Weinstein should not be in prison right now.'