The Yak
The Yak
March 30, 2026

The Internet Is Clowning Riggs and Daniel Rapaport For Defending Tiger Woods | The Yak 3-30-26

Quick Read

Barstool personalities Riggs and Daniel Rapaport face widespread ridicule for their staunch, and often tone-deaf, public defense of Tiger Woods following his latest car accident, sparking a debate on athlete idolization and enabling behavior.
Riggs attempted to censor news about Tiger Woods' car accident on Barstool Sports, drawing heavy criticism.
Daniel Rapaport's emotional video claiming driving was Tiger's 'normal' and 'in control' moment went viral for its perceived absurdity.
The hosts frame these defenses as 'enabling' behavior, questioning why media figures protect athletes despite repeated personal failings.

Summary

The Yak podcast dissects the internet's reaction to Barstool Sports' Riggs and Daniel Rapaport's defenses of Tiger Woods after his recent car accident. Riggs attempted to suppress news about the incident on Barstool, while Rapaport posted an emotional video suggesting driving was Woods' only 'normal' and 'in control' moment. The hosts criticize this 'enabling' behavior and the broader societal tendency to idolize athletes despite their personal failings. The episode also covers internal Barstool antics, including Rico Bosco's 'apology hack' for offensive comments, White Sox Dave's unconventional parenting advice, and details about an upcoming Barstool mini-golf Ryder Cup.
This episode highlights the complex relationship between sports media, celebrity culture, and personal accountability. It showcases how loyalty to an athlete can lead to public relations missteps and 'enabling' behavior, while also exposing the performative nature of some apologies and corporate social gestures. For media professionals, it serves as a case study in managing public perception and the pitfalls of defending controversial figures.

Takeaways

  • Riggs issued an internal embargo on Tiger Woods car accident news at Barstool Sports to 'protect' him, which was widely mocked.
  • Daniel Rapaport's video expressing sadness over Tiger's accident and suggesting driving made him feel 'normal' and 'in control' garnered 10 million views and significant backlash.
  • The hosts argue that Riggs and Rapaport act as 'enablers' for Tiger Woods, prioritizing their relationship or idolization over accountability.
  • The repeated incidents involving Tiger Woods (cheating, DUIs, multiple car accidents) lead to a discussion on the problematic nature of idolizing athletes.
  • Barstool personality Rico Bosco employs an 'apology hack,' making offensive comments (like about a dead dad or ugly sister) and then issuing insincere, rehearsed apologies.
  • White Sox Dave's parenting philosophy involves not taking kids on spring break to prevent them from becoming 'soft' or 'rich kids'.
  • The Detroit Red Wings were criticized for a 'Detroit supports women's hockey' shirt with an extremely tiny font, seen as performative activism.

Insights

1Barstool Personalities' Controversial Defense of Tiger Woods

Riggs, a prominent Barstool figure, attempted to prevent any blogs about Tiger Woods' latest car accident from being posted on Barstool Sports, explicitly stating he wanted to 'protect' Woods. Separately, Daniel Rapaport, another golf media personality, posted an emotional video lamenting Woods' situation, claiming that driving was the only time Woods felt 'normal' and 'in control.' Both actions drew significant online ridicule for perceived enabling and a lack of critical perspective on Woods' repeated incidents.

Riggs' video stating, 'You're goddamn right I did' when asked if he told the team not to post about Tiger's DUI (). Daniel Rapaport's video stating, 'I think driving is one place where he feels like kind of normal and, you know, in control' ().

2The Problematic Nature of Athlete Idolization

The hosts critically discuss the societal tendency to idolize athletes, even those with a history of serious personal misconduct. They argue that figures like Charles Barkley were correct in stating that athletes are not role models, and that the continued defense of Tiger Woods by some media figures stems from an inability to separate his athletic achievements from his personal failings, creating an 'enabler' dynamic.

Host stating, 'At what point do we like do you have to wake up and be like, 'Hey, we shouldn't idolize athletes.' Like Charles Barkley was the most right anyone's ever been when he did the whole I'm not a role model' ().

3Rico Bosco's 'Apology Hack' and Boundary-Pushing Behavior

Barstool personality Rico Bosco is highlighted for a pattern of making highly offensive personal attacks, such as joking about a colleague's dead father or calling another's sister 'ugly' on her wedding day, followed by quick, seemingly insincere apologies. The hosts refer to this as an 'apology hack,' where he leverages apologies to continue pushing boundaries without genuine remorse, creating a chaotic but entertaining dynamic.

Discussion of Rico talking about Jeff Nadu's 'dead dad' and issuing an apology (), and previously saying Nadu's sister 'looked ugly on her wedding day' (). Host stating, 'They've discovered the apology hack' ().

4Dan Rapaport's Rationale for Defending Tiger Woods

During an interview, Daniel Rapaport explains his viral video was a genuine, emotional reaction stemming from his long history covering and idolizing Woods. He cites an HBO documentary's line, 'the fishes don't know he's Tiger Woods,' to explain Woods' need for normalcy, suggesting driving provides this. While acknowledging Woods' impaired driving is inexcusable, Rapaport maintains his perspective that Woods' unique life as a phenom from age three has created a need for moments of personal control.

Rapaport explaining, 'I was like Tiger's like I did everything Tiger, so I was like kind of around him... there's definitely a little bit of like personal stuff wrapped up' (). He references the 'fishes don't know he's Tiger Woods' line from the HBO documentary ().

Bottom Line

The continued public defense of Tiger Woods by media figures like Riggs and Rapaport, despite his repeated personal failings, highlights a significant conflict of interest between journalistic integrity and personal idolization/access.

So What?

This behavior erodes trust in media personalities who prioritize celebrity relationships over objective reporting or ethical commentary, potentially influencing public perception of accountability for high-profile individuals.

Impact

Media organizations could implement clearer guidelines for personalities covering individuals they have personal connections to or openly idolize, ensuring a more balanced and ethical approach to reporting on controversial figures.

Rico Bosco's 'apology hack' demonstrates a pattern of leveraging performative apologies to maintain a controversial persona without genuine behavioral change, effectively weaponizing the apology mechanism.

So What?

This tactic, while entertaining for some, normalizes insincere apologies and can desensitize audiences to genuinely harmful rhetoric, blurring the lines between humor and malice.

Impact

Content platforms could develop mechanisms to track and flag repeated patterns of offensive behavior followed by formulaic apologies, prompting a review of content creators who consistently use this 'hack' to avoid accountability.

Key Concepts

The Enabler Dynamic

This model describes a relationship where one person (the enabler) supports or encourages another's problematic behavior, often by minimizing consequences or providing excuses. In this context, Riggs and Rapaport are seen as enabling Tiger Woods' repeated personal failings by defending him or suppressing negative news, potentially hindering his path to recovery.

Athlete Idolization Fallacy

This refers to the societal tendency to elevate athletes to a status of moral infallibility or role models, often overlooking or excusing their personal misconduct due to their athletic prowess. The podcast argues against this, suggesting that being a great athlete does not equate to being a good person, and that such idolization can prevent critical assessment of their actions.

The Apology Hack

A tactic where an individual repeatedly makes offensive or inappropriate statements, knowing they can issue a quick, often insincere, apology to mitigate immediate backlash without genuinely changing their behavior. This allows them to continue pushing boundaries while maintaining a superficial appearance of remorse.

Lessons

  • Critically evaluate public figures and athletes: Separate their professional achievements from their personal conduct to avoid blind idolization and enabling problematic behavior.
  • Recognize performative apologies: Be skeptical of individuals who repeatedly issue quick, rehearsed apologies after making offensive statements, as this may be a tactic to avoid genuine accountability.
  • Challenge media bias: Pay attention to how media personalities cover individuals they admire or have personal connections with, and question whether their commentary is objective or influenced by personal loyalty.

Revitalizing Deutsch's March Madness Beer Bracket

1

Implement 'State Outlines' Challenge: For each Final Four team, create a large outline of its state on a wall using beer cans. Deutsch must drink the beers forming the outline of any eliminated team.

2

Introduce 'Final Four 40s': Instead of regular beers, require Deutsch to drink 40-ounce bottles for the Final Four games to increase the stakes and alcohol consumption.

3

Integrate 'Technical Foul Bingo': Create a bingo card with common basketball events (e.g., technical foul, specific player action). Deutsch must drink a beer for each marked square, ensuring continuous engagement.

Notable Moments

The Detroit Red Wings' 'Support Women's Hockey' Shirt

The team was seen carrying shirts with 'Detroit supports women's hockey' printed in an extremely tiny, almost unreadable font, and not wearing them. This was widely mocked as a performative and insincere gesture of support, highlighting the pitfalls of tokenistic corporate social responsibility efforts.

Last-Second Game-Winning Shot in Duke Basketball Game

A highly difficult, last-second shot won a Duke basketball game, leading to an iconic, stunned reaction from the Duke radio announcer who maintained composure despite clear heartbreak. This moment became a viral example of sports commentary professionalism amidst personal team loyalty.

Jeff D Lowe Jumps in Pool After Duke's Loss

Following Duke's dramatic loss in a March Madness game, Barstool personality Jeff D Lowe was filmed jumping into a pool in celebration. This exemplifies the intense, often over-the-top, reactions and rivalries within the Barstool community surrounding major sporting events.

Big Cat Attempts 72-Hour Fast

After a period of unhealthy eating during March Madness and vacation, Big Cat attempts a 72-hour water and coffee fast to 'reset' his system. This personal challenge reflects a broader trend of extreme wellness practices and the desire for quick physical and mental resets.

Quotes

"

"You think I told our team to not post about Tiger Woods' DUI and to protect him? You're goddamn right I did."

Riggs
"

"If Tiger Woods does get help, Riggs is the very first person that Tiger Woods will have to cut out of his life. Yeah, he's an enabler."

Host
"

"I think driving is one place where he feels like kind of normal and, you know, in control."

Daniel Rapaport
"

"Just woke up in Japan to another Tiger Woods car accident."

Daniel Rapaport
"

"At what point do we like do you have to wake up and be like, 'Hey, we shouldn't idolize athletes.'"

Host
"

"He keeps dropping the line 'I am the economy.' He talked about Jeff's Nadu's dead dad... and then issued an apology. Everyone's got struggles."

Host
"

"I learned a lot from you know, my years with you guys. Like once you start deleting that's that's a game that you you can never play. So just let it sit."

Daniel Rapaport

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes