Liberal Media Anchors IMPLODE As Trump Deputy AG SCHOOLS Them On Why Don Lemon Is Going To PRISON!

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanch clarified that while a magistrate judge initially rejected an arrest warrant for Don Lemon, a judge on the appeals court later stated there was 'clearly probable cause.' Crucially, the system allows for a grand jury to determine probable cause and issue an indictment, which is what occurred. The grand jury, comprising 25 Minneapolis citizens, concluded that probable cause existed, leading to Lemon's indictment.

Blanch: 'The appeals court a judge on the appeals court said that there was clearly probable cause... only a grand jury can can bring forth an indictment. And so that's what we did. We went to a grand jury... And that's what returned an indictment.'

The host and Deputy AG Blanch argue that Don Lemon's actions went beyond neutral observation. Blanch cited allegations from the indictment, including Lemon's involvement in planning, decisions to keep police unaware, and surreptitiously avoiding disclosure of their location. The host further emphasized Lemon's on-camera statements expressing intent to disrupt the church service and maintain secrecy to ensure the 'operation's' success, framing these as active participation in a conspiracy.

Blanch: 'You conveniently left out multiple allegations in that indictment about what else Mr. Lemon did, including surreptitiously avoiding saying where they were going, being part of the planning, being part of the decisions to make sure the police didn't know this was happening.' (11:08) Host: 'Don Lemon's explicit stated stated purpose for maintaining operational secrecy was to help the plan succeed. He said that on camera.'

The host asserts that the mainstream liberal media's strong defense of Don Lemon is not about protecting journalism but about protecting themselves. He argues that many so-called journalists are actually activists who disguise their actions as reporting. If Lemon is held accountable for 'criminal activism,' it threatens the perceived 'legal shield' that these activists believe protects them from consequences for interfering with others' rights.

Host: 'If Don Lemon actually is held accountable for his actions, then it will be the first time that a liberal journalist has actually been held accountable for criminal activism disguised as journalism.' (03:23) 'They feel threatened by that... they have an absolute right of freedom of press, freedom of speech, uh to the point where they think that they can't interfere on the rights of others.'

The podcast stresses that freedom of the press and speech are not absolute rights. They stop where other people's rights begin, specifically referencing the freedom of religion and the right to worship. The host argues that Don Lemon's alleged actions interfered with the rights of churchgoers, and his status as a journalist does not grant him immunity from laws protecting those rights.

Host: 'You do not have absolute rights and that rights stop where other people's rights begin.' (22:28) 'Don Lim is finding out that no, you don't have a right to conspire with others to commit the crime of interfering with people's rights to worship... and think that you uh aren't going to be held accountable because you're a so-called journalist.'