Hantavirus Lockdowns + Fauci's DOJ Deadline | PBD #794

A Hantavirus outbreak on a luxury cruise ship, with a 38% kill rate and a person-to-person spreading strain, has raised alarm. The World Health Organization (WHO) deployed experts, but hosts express skepticism, linking it to previous COVID-19 narratives and a perceived WHO agenda for global health control. They highlight WHO Director-General Tedros's past statements advocating for a global entity in response to outbreaks and note the timing of the outbreak after Argentina and the US withdrew from WHO agreements.

A luxury cruise ship carrying 147 passengers, 3 dead, 8 cases, 38% kill rate, and the only known person-to-person Hantavirus strain. WHO deployed experts and diagnostic kits. CDC states 'risk to American public at this time is extremely low.' Vinnie notes Tedros's past statements about needing a global entity and hopes for incidents to make countries reconsider WHO withdrawal. The ship departed from an Argentine port. Pfizer's 38-page document allegedly lists Hantavirus as a side effect, and Moderna/Korea University are working on an mRNA Hantavirus vaccine.

Dr. Anthony Fauci faces severe accusations of two major crimes: 'fraudulent concealment' for intentionally hiding the origins of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) from his funded projects in Wuhan, and 'mass negligent homicide' through two mechanisms. First, by suppressing early treatment protocols that could have helped people, and second, by relentlessly promoting unsafe vaccines that allegedly led to hundreds of thousands of American deaths and millions worldwide. The hosts emphasize a May 11th deadline related to Fauci's 5-year statute of limitations, suggesting a potential accountability moment.

Dr. Peter McCullough's clip detailing accusations against Fauci. Fauci allegedly sought a 10-year pardon from Biden. Accusations include concealing COVID-19 origins from Wuhan and suppressing early treatment protocols while promoting unsafe vaccines. The May 11th date is mentioned as Fauci's 5-year statute of limitation deadline.

The Los Angeles mayoral race is heating up, with Karen Bass and socialist candidate Nithia Raman facing increasing scrutiny. Raman drew criticism for blaming Toyota, not thieves, for catalytic converter thefts. Spencer Pratt, a reality TV star, is gaining traction by presenting himself as a 'normal' candidate, contrasting sharply with what the hosts describe as 'leftist lunatics' and their failed policies contributing to LA's homelessness and affordability crisis. The debate also covered allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections, where Pratt gave a clear 'no' while Bass equivocated.

Nithia Raman's clip blaming Toyota for catalytic converter theft. Spencer Pratt's rising poll numbers (27.3%) against Raman (28.2%) and Bass (47.2%). Pratt's criticism of Bass and Raman's policies on homelessness, stating they 'cost us over $400 million to house for 7,000' people. The 'yes or no' question on non-citizens voting, where Pratt said 'no' and Bass gave a 'depends' answer. California has 9 of the top 10 most expensive cities for homeowners in the US.

Howard Lutnik, a prominent figure, is under fire for allegedly misleading about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. House Democrats, including James Comer and Representative Yasmine, claim Lutnik was 'not 100% truthful' about visiting Epstein's island and maintaining contact after publicly stating he cut ties in 2005. Evidence suggests he was in email correspondence with Epstein as recently as 2018 and took his family to see Epstein in 2012, contradicting his earlier claims of disgust and disassociation.

James Comer states Lutnik 'wasn't 100% truthful with whether or not he had been on the island.' Representative Yasmine calls Lutnik a 'pathological liar' enabling 'the most egregious cover up in American history,' citing his 2012 visit with family to Epstein after claiming in 2005 he would 'never socially or professionally be involved or be in a room with Jeffrey Epstein again.'

NFL player Stefon Diggs was found not guilty of assault and strangulation charges brought by his former personal chef, Jamila Adams, who sought $5.4 million. The defense successfully countered Adams's claims by highlighting her inconsistent testimony, her inability to answer basic questions, lack of medical or photographic evidence, and a video showing her dancing days after the alleged attack. The case is presented as an example of false accusations against public figures and the importance of verifying claims.

Jury found Stefon Diggs not guilty after two hours of deliberation. Jamila Adams sought $5.4 million. Defense presented lack of medical/photographic evidence and a video of Adams dancing days after the alleged attack. Adams struggled to answer questions during testimony, prompting the judge to warn her about evading questions.