Massie & Khanna PUSH DOJ To Unredact NEW NAMES In The Epstein Files!!!

Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna visited the Department of Justice and discovered that 70-80% of the Epstein files remained redacted. Their direct intervention led the DOJ to acknowledge a 'mistake' and reveal six previously hidden names, including prominent figures like Salvatore Nav'ora, Nicola Capuda, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, and Les Wexner.

Congressman Massie and I went to the Department of Justice to read the unredacted Epstein files. We spent about two hours there and we learned that 70 to 80% of the files are still redacted. In fact, there were six wealthy, powerful men that the DOJ hid for no apparent reason. When Congressman Massie and I pointed this out to the Department of Justice, they acknowledged their mistake and now they have revealed the identity of these six powerful men.

The host asserts that the DOJ's initial redactions were not a mistake but part of an ongoing cover-up, noting that survivor names were not redacted while alleged co-conspirators' names were, and even Donald Trump's name was seemingly targeted for redaction in unrelated contexts (e.g., 'don't'). Les Wexner's name, despite appearing thousands of times, was specifically redacted in one key document, only to be unredacted after Massie's public challenge.

Look, I don't know if it was a mistake. I wouldn't really give this administration the benefit of the doubt when it comes to the Epstein files, especially because of the fact that they've been engaged in this cover up from the very beginning. Trump wanted people to forget about it... In releasing the Epstein files, as we know, the first trunch was heavily redacted and the second trunch was both heavily redacted and had questionable redactions. not just the fact that they were redacting the names of the alleged uh you know co-conspirators but also because of the fact that they did not redact the names of the survivors. They did not redact the names of the survivors. Also, another thing that was very clear to me is they wanted to redact Donald Trump's name anywhere they could find it.

During the first meeting of Trump's Religious Liberty Commission, Catholic conservative activist Carrie Pjan Bowler challenged panelists on their broad definition of anti-Semitism, arguing that her Catholic faith does not align with Zionism and questioning if that makes her anti-Semitic. The debate escalated, with one panelist unequivocally stating, 'Undoubtedly anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.'

As you know, I'm a Catholic. I'm a Catholic and Catholics do not embrace Zionism, just so you know. So, is are all Catholics anti-semites? According to you, as I said, anti anti-ionism by denying the right of the Jews to have their own state while not saying the same for any other peoples. That is a double standard hypocrisy and anti-semitism. So, just to be clear, are Catholics anti-semit? Carrie, excuse me. I'm going to interrupt... Undoubtedly anti-Zionism is anti-semitism.

President Trump's economic net approval has significantly declined, particularly among independents, with 52% of Americans believing his policies have worsened the economy. Despite an initial executive order to ban institutional investors from buying residential real estate to improve affordability, Trump later stated he wanted to drive housing prices up, creating a contradiction that Congress is exploiting to stonewall the investor ban.

Trump's economic net approval one year in among independents. In term one, he was 10 points above water. Look at where he is today. Whoa. 43 points below water. That's a 53 point switcher... President Donald Trump initially had signed an executive order to drive institutional investors like private equity firms, for instance, out of the housing market to make housing more affordable. Right? But as you saw in that video, he later stated that he actually wanted to drive housing prices up.

Congressional Democrats are demanding that federal law enforcement (Border Patrol, ICE) obtain judicial warrants, not administrative warrants (issued by the executive branch to itself), before entering private property. The host argues that the DHS's defense of administrative warrants, claiming undocumented individuals lack Fourth Amendment protections, is false and normalizes privacy violations, setting a dangerous precedent for data collection and government overreach in the age of AI.

Congressional Democrats are demanding that federal law enforcement, you know, Border Patrol and ICE, obtain a judicial warrant signed by a judge before entering private property... DHS council, general counsel James Persal claims that this is consistent with broad judicial recognition that illegal aliens aren't entitled to the same Fourth Amendment protections as US citizens. That's not true, by the way... I also think it's about normalizing violations of our privacy, including the entrance of federal agents into private property without the appropriate warrants... in the name of AI, in the name of technological advancement, in the name of competing and beating chi competing with and beating China.

The Trump administration is formalizing the repeal of the 2009 Obama-era endangerment finding, which concluded that six greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare. This repeal, described as the 'largest deregulatory action in American history,' will erase federal limits on emissions from power plants, cars, and other industries, driven by a secretive campaign by conservative activists funded by the fossil fuel industry.

On Thursday, President Trump will be joined by administrator Lee Zeldon to formalize the recision of the 2009 Obama era endangerment finding. This will be the largest deregulatory action in American history... The reversal targets the 2009 endangerment finding which concluded that six greenhound g greenhouse which concluded that six greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health and welfare... EPA administrator Lee Zelden straight up said in an interview, 'This amounts to the largest act of deregulation in the history of the United States.'