IHIP News: 🚨 Ex-ICE INSIDER EXPOSES Cruel Practices, It's Even WORSE Than You Imagined!

Elliot Williams, a former senior political appointee at ICE, states that ICE has 'lost the thread' in its mission. He argues that the agency's current approach to immigration enforcement is driven by 'huge incentives' to be 'tough' and 'mean,' rather than focusing on effective policy. A specific example cited is the practice of removing individuals from the U.S. and sending them to countries where they have no language skills, family ties, or prior residence, which Williams frames as 'intentional saber rattling cruelty.'

Elliot Williams' personal experience as a senior political appointee at ICE under the Obama administration. He explicitly states, 'ICE has lost the thread here... in the huge incentives that they've been given to carry out their immigration enforcement mission.' He details the cruelty of deporting individuals to countries like sub-Saharan Africa when they are from Jamaica or Mexico.

The Justice Department is experiencing a significant degradation of its core values and operational effectiveness. This is attributed to the departure of smart, competent, non-partisan professionals and the appointment of politically connected, unconfirmed individuals to critical roles like US attorneys. These appointments, such as Alina Haba in New Jersey and Lindseay Halligan in Eastern District of Virginia, are seen as damaging to the department's work, as courts view these appointees as improperly in their roles, screwing up cases.

Elliot Williams, having worked at the Justice Department and ICE, expresses heartbreak over the situation. He notes, 'This is not a normal partisan shift... This is sort the erosion of core values of how the organization ought to admit and I think ought to exist.' He specifically mentions the hiring of US attorneys 'who haven't been confirmed by the Senate at all,' citing Alina Haba and Lindseay Halligan as examples, stating these appointments 'screw up cases that they want to bring.'

The Supreme Court has lost its perceived apolitical nature, with justices openly displaying partisan biases. The host and guest discuss how actions like Justice Samuel Alito's wife flying a January 6th-associated flag outside their home taints a justice's ability to hear related cases, regardless of their internal fairness. This behavior contributes to the public perception that justices are not impartial.

Elliot Williams states, 'We've lost some of this veneer or notion that justices are or ought to be apolitical.' He uses the example of Justice Alito's flag, arguing that 'the moment you fly a flag in front of your house, expressing a political view, you have tainted your ability as a Supreme Court justice to hear cases on that issue.'

Media, both traditional and modern, plays a critical role in shaping public perception and enabling political figures. Historically, Rupert Murdoch's takeover of the New York Post in the 1970s turbocharged crime coverage to instill fear and racial resentment. Presently, corporate media's failure to apply consistent scrutiny to certain politicians, coupled with algorithms that create echo chambers, further radicalizes the public and allows misinformation to proliferate.

Elliot Williams discusses his book 'Five Bullets,' detailing 'Rupert Murdoch's takeover of the New York Post... which totally turbocharged coverage of crime in New York City to frighten people.' He connects this to Fox News's later success in 'frightening people.' The host and Williams also criticize corporate media for providing a 'permission structure' for 'liars' and 'gaslighting the American public,' citing the example of Donald Trump's gaffes receiving less scrutiny than those of other presidents. Williams also highlights how 'algorithms now that only feed you likeminded things' are 'radicalizing people,' using the Kyle Rittenhouse case as an example.