LIVE COURT | UT v. Kouri Richins Sentencing Hearing
YouTube · BIAxKY5M8I8
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Judge M denied the state's request for a continuous protective order against Kouri Richins, citing Utah law's inability to protect a deceased victim from future harm.
- ❖Eric Richins' family delivered emotional victim impact statements, detailing Kouri's manipulation of the children, attempts to seize Eric's assets, and the profound, ongoing trauma they endured.
- ❖Dr. Amy Richins, Eric's sister, revealed receiving a threatening burner phone message from Kouri and suffered a traumatic miscarriage of twins due to the case's stress.
- ❖Therapists read victim impact statements from Eric's three young sons, describing their fear and confusion after their father's death and Kouri's subsequent actions, including isolating them in the basement.
- ❖The prosecution requested a sentence of life in prison without parole for Kouri Richins, along with significant restitution to insurance companies and Summit County for defense costs.
Insights
1Judge Denies Continuous Protective Order for Deceased Victim
Judge M denied the state's request for a continuous protective order against Kouri Richins, ruling that Utah Code 78B-7-804 subsection 3 does not grant the court authority to issue such an order when the domestic violence victim is deceased and cannot reasonably fear future harm. The judge acknowledged this might not be the legislature's intended result and encouraged legislative review to fill this gap, but stated his role is to follow existing law.
The court determines as a matter of law that it cannot issue a continuous protective order in this case because it is evident that the victim of the domestic violence charges in this case for which Miss Richens was convicted cannot possibly have a reasonable fear of future harm or abuse. I would encourage the legislature to take a hard look at 78B 7804 subsection 3 to fill this gap explicitly.
2Kouri Richins' Continued Financial Schemes and Child Isolation
Eric Richins' sister, Katie Richins Benson, detailed how Kouri isolated Eric's sons from his family, used them as bargaining chips, and spread false, harmful information about Eric's family. Kouri also drained the boys' college funds, allowed survivor benefits to be funneled to others, and filed three civil lawsuits against Eric's trust, aiming to seize all assets intended for the children.
Almost immediately after Eric died, she cut them off completely from our family. From Eric's family. Corey used the boys as bargaining chips with my dad. She repeatedly threatened not to let him see his grandsons unless he could convince me as Eric's trustee... to capitulate to her legal demands and give her all the trust assets. She drained the personal bank accounts that Eric had set up for his boys as college funds. She allowed the boys social security survivor benefits to be funneled to individuals who were not taking care of the boys. And she sued me in my role as Eric's trustee representative not once, not twice, but three separate times.
3Traumatic Miscarriage Linked to Case Stress and Kouri's Actions
Dr. Amy Richins, Eric's other sister, revealed that the unrelenting stress of the investigation and constant attacks on their family led her to suffer a traumatic miscarriage of twins. She directly attributed this loss to Kouri's actions, stating that Kouri's actions 'didn't just end one life. They reached out and stifled the lives of my unborn children as well.'
Because of the unrelenting stress of this investigation and the constant attacks on our family, I suffered a traumatic miscarriage of twins. We lost our children. We lost the future we were building. Cory's actions didn't just end one life. They reached out and stifled the lives of my unborn children as well.
4Children's Trauma and Fear of Kouri
Therapists, representing Eric's three young sons, read their victim impact statements. The boys described waking to sirens, feeling scared and confused, and Kouri's subsequent action of putting them in the basement with a neighbor, which made them fear 'something really bad was happening again.' They also expressed constant worry that Kouri might 'show up one day and take them away.'
I woke up to sirens and there were a lot of people at my house and I was definitely scared. I felt confused. After my dad died, Corey would put us in the basement while she was with the neighbor. I felt scared because I thought something really bad was happening again. They worry constantly that Corey might show up one day and take them away.
5Children's Accusations of Neglect and Abuse
Kouri Richins' children, identified as WR, AR, and CR, delivered powerful victim impact statements through their therapists. They accused their mother of locking them in the basement or their rooms, neglecting their well-being, and being frequently drunk or absent. Specific allegations included forcing them to eat uncooked lasagna, showing them videos of starving children, and causing the deaths of family pets and livestock through neglect or direct action (e.g., kitten eaten by raccoons, chickens and bunnies freezing).
WR stated, 'After my dad died, Corey would put us in the basement while she was with the neighbor.' AR detailed, 'You would lock C in his room and I would have to go to the kitchen and bring him food.' CR recounted, 'You wouldn't let me put my kitten in the garage for safety at night... And we found it eaten by raccoons the next day.'
6Children's Desire for Life Sentence and Fear of Richins
All three children expressed profound emotional distress, difficulty trusting others, and a strong desire for Kouri Richins to remain in prison indefinitely. They articulated fears for their safety and future if she were ever released, highlighting the deep trauma and anger they felt towards her for their father's death and her subsequent actions.
WR stated, 'I want her to go to prison forever. If she got out, I would be so scared, really mad.' CR said, 'I don't want you out of jail because I will not feel safe if you are out.'
7Defense's Counter-Narrative: Richins as a 'Good Person' and Accomplished Individual
The defense presented numerous mitigation statements from Richins' mother, sister, aunt, friends, and even former business investors and jail volunteers. These statements consistently portrayed Richins as a loving, devoted mother, a generous community member, and a highly ambitious and educated individual. They highlighted her academic achievements (multiple degrees, including a paralegal certificate and MBA while incarcerated) and her efforts to help others, both in the community and in jail.
Richins' mother's statement detailed her 'devoted herself to her children,' 'volunteered weekly at school,' and 'earned her paralegal certificate in 2025' and 'completed her MBA in 2026' while incarcerated. Greg Hall stated, 'She made a habit of looking for people who were struggling.'
8Arguments Against Life Without Parole
The defense explicitly argued against a sentence of life without parole, describing it as a punishment reserved for the 'most depraved crimes' and one that strips individuals of hope, community, and any chance for rehabilitation. They presented witnesses who had personal experiences with the justice system, including a mother who regretted seeking life without parole for her son's killer and a former prosecutor who witnessed rehabilitation, to advocate for a sentence allowing for future parole.
Defense attorney Nester stated, 'Less than 100 individuals have been determined to be worthy of a sentence of life without parole... judges throughout this state reserve it for the most depraved crimes.'
9Host's Observation of Richins' Lack of Remorse
Throughout the defense's mitigation presentations, the host, Emily D. Baker, repeatedly noted the absence of any expression of remorse from Kouri Richins or in the statements read on her behalf. This observation highlighted a significant disconnect between the defense's portrayal of Richins' character and the gravity of her conviction.
Emily D. Baker commented, 'Corey has shown no remorse. None of these letters have indicated remorse. Not a single one.'
10Defense Presents Mitigation Evidence on Richins's Character and Potential for Redemption
The defense called a jail chaplain and a volunteer to speak to Kouri Richins's character while incarcerated. The chaplain noted Richins's three years of attendance at services, hospitality to other inmates, participation in discussions, and her well-read study Bible, suggesting a thriving faith. Heidi Tunny, a volunteer, described Richins as easy to work with, thoughtful, grateful, and a leader among incarcerated women, even initiating a yoga program.
Chaplain: 'The Corey I know will thrive where she is. She will trust in her God for peace and she will pray.' Heidi Tunny: 'I found Corey to be very easy to work with and very enjoyable to be around. She was very thoughtful in her conversations with charming. She always showed the utmost gratitude for anything that was done on her behalf. I also noticed that she was a leader among the other incarcerated women.'
11Kouri Richins's Brother Expresses Grief and Belief in Her Innocence
Ronnie Richins, Kouri's brother, read a deeply emotional letter addressed directly to Kouri, expressing profound personal loss, missing shared family moments, and lamenting 'the life that was stolen from us.' He controversially stated, 'We don't with 100% certainty know what happened, Eric. No one does. But we do know with 100% certainty, but it wasn't caused by you.' He promised to keep his father's promise to look after her and expressed belief that 'the injustice that's occurred here in this courtroom, it'll be right in time. Your innocence will shine too brightly to be contained.'
'Little sister, I love you.' () 'I miss the life that was stolen from us uh for reasons that we can't yet fully understand.' () 'Your innocence will shine too brightly to be contained once you've actually had a fair shot at defending yourself.' ()
12Defense Attorney Ramos Makes a Personal and Religious Plea Against Life Without Parole
Attorney Alex Ramos delivered an unusual and highly personal statement, openly disagreeing with the jury's verdict and the court's rulings. He invoked his Catholic faith, stating, 'there's one authority higher than any courtroom, verdict or government power, and that is God.' Ramos argued that a sentence of life without parole (LWOP) is a 'death penalty in disguise' that 'extinguishes hope' and 'risks becoming the declaration that redemption no longer matters.' He contended that refusing LWOP 'does not close the door completely' on human change and potential for forgiveness, even for victims.
'I disagree with the jury's verdict. I'm deeply saddened by the way that justice was rendered in this case.' () 'But as a Catholic, there's one authority higher than any courtroom, verdict or government power, and that is God.' () 'The late Pope Francis said that life without the rule is just a death penalty in disguise because it extinguishes something fundamental to human dignity. That is hope.' ()
13Mitigation Witnesses Advocate for Mercy and Possibility of Rehabilitation
The defense presented letters and testimony from individuals not directly connected to Richins but who had experience with the criminal justice system and its impact. A mother whose son was murdered 30 years prior spoke about her journey from wanting the killer to die to finding hope and forgiveness, arguing against LWOP. A former prosecutor shared a case where a double homicide offender rehabilitated significantly in prison, leading to reconciliation with victims' families before his tragic suicide. Emory Blanchard, a child of a domestic violence homicide, testified about her eventual reconciliation with her father in prison, emphasizing that 'hearts and feelings can change over the years' and the importance of not extinguishing hope for future relationships.
Mother of murder victim: 'Sending someone to prison without the possibility of parole should be reserved for the very rare, absolutely most heinous cases.' () Former prosecutor: 'This case was a textbook lesson of how rehabilitation can work.' () Emory Blanchard: 'My father was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole. At the time, I wanted him to go to prison for a long time, and I didn't want to see him again.' () 'I'm offering that hearts and feelings can change over the years.' ()
14Defense Attorney Lewis Challenges Prosecution's Sentencing Memo and Argues for Lesser Sentence
Attorney Lewis focused on legal standards, arguing that Richins's crime, while serious, does not fit the 'worst of the worst' category typically reserved for life without parole in Utah. She cited statistics of only 72 individuals serving such sentences, detailing their crimes (serial killers, child murderers, multiple victims) to contrast with Richins's single-victim case. Lewis vehemently criticized the prosecution's sentencing memo, filed two days before the hearing, as a 'character assassination' based on 'unsubstantiated claims from unknown and unsworn sources,' arguing it violated Richins's due process rights and should be stricken. She also refuted specific allegations from the memo, such as DCFS findings and Richins's life insurance policies on her children.
'This simply is not the type of crime that we typically see get a sentence of life without parole.' () 'Currently, there are approximately only 72 people in Utah serving the sentence.' () 'The state's memo should be stricken in its entirety and not considered by this court.' () 'Cory only discovered yesterday that at least two of these policies are still active as the payments have been automatically taken out of dividends. So, in other words, the policies have been paying for themselves. However, now that Corey knows that these are still active, she will cancel them.' ()
15Kouri Richins Delivers a Controversial Statement Directly to Her Children, Maintaining Innocence
Kouri Richins used her allocution opportunity to deliver a lengthy, emotional statement addressed directly to her three sons, not the court. She claimed her communication with them had been 'completely cut off' since early 2024 by their aunt and uncle, and that she had been 'desperately trying to get in contact.' Richins professed her unwavering love, apologized if they thought she abandoned them, and offered extensive life advice on forgiveness, resilience, and loyalty. Crucially, she maintained her innocence, stating, 'Never apologize for something you didn't do. Never admit to something you didn't do. And never beg for mercy for something you didn't do.' She also claimed she 'can't give you something that I don't have. An explanation that I just don't know' regarding their father's death, and criticized the jury's swift verdict.
'My sweet baby boys, I know that today you don't want to speak to me, have a relationship with me, or you may think you hate me, and that's okay.' () 'All of my communication has been completely cut off from you since early 2024.' () 'I did not abandon you.' () 'Never apologize for something you didn't do. Never admit to something you didn't do. And never beg for mercy for something you didn't do.' () 'I can't give you something that I don't have. An explanation that I just don't know.' ()
16Life Without Parole Sentence for Aggravated Murder
The court sentenced Kouri Richins to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the aggravated murder of her husband, Eric Richins. This was the most severe option available, reflecting the court's assessment of the gravity of her crime.
The court hereby sentences you to life without parole.
17Consecutive Sentences for Multiple Felonies
In addition to life without parole, Richins received consecutive indeterminate prison terms for other convictions: up to 5 years for forgery, 1-15 years for two counts of insurance fraud, and 5 years to life for attempted aggravated murder. These consecutive sentences are largely symbolic given the life without parole, but provide protection against future law changes.
The court hereby sentences you to an indeterminate prison term not to exceed 5 years (Count 5), 1-15 years (Counts 3 & 4), and 5 years to life (Count 2). The sentences on counts two through five shall run consecutively to each other and to the sentence imposed on count one.
18Judge's Reasoning: Calculated Act for Pecuniary Gain
The judge justified the life without parole sentence by emphasizing Richins' unanimous conviction for attempting to murder Eric, then 'doubling down' to complete the act via poison, all for 'pecuniary gain.' The court concluded she was 'too dangerous to ever be free.'
Corey Richens was convicted unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt of attempting to murder Eric Richens... and then having failed in her first effort... doubling down, preparing to try again, and ultimately completing the act through the administration of poison... All for pecuniary gain. A person convicted of those things is simply too dangerous to ever be free.
19Kouri Richins' Defiant Allocution
In her statement to the court, Richins maintained her innocence, claiming Eric was in 'physical pain' and that the murder accusation was an 'absolute lie.' She directly addressed her sons, stating she would appeal and 'never quit or give up on this fight for justice, the truth, and coming home to you.'
God did not put me in this world to take a life... as much as you've been influenced into thinking that dad was murdered... that is completely wrong and an absolute lie... I will appeal... I will never quit or give up on this fight for justice, the truth, and coming home to you.
20Victim's Family Expresses Gratitude and Ongoing Grief
Amy Richins, Eric's sister, delivered a statement to the media, thanking the court, law enforcement, and jury for recognizing the intentional nature of Eric's death. She highlighted Eric's character and the family's enduring trauma, noting that while the verdict matters, it doesn't bring Eric back or provide full finality due to ongoing legal battles.
Today, the court recognized that what happened to Eric Richens was not an accident... His life was taken intentionally and permanently... The verdict and this sentence speak louder than any misinformation ever could... No sentence can undo the trauma this has caused... Honestly, no. And I was asking everybody else this too cuz I even after the um conviction doesn't change.
Bottom Line
The defense's strategy included bringing in former business investors who had lost money with Kouri Richins but still advocated for a lighter sentence, praising her character and business acumen.
This suggests a powerful manipulative charm or persuasive ability on Richins' part, capable of retaining loyalty even from those she financially harmed. It highlights how personal relationships and perceived character can influence perspectives on accountability, even in the face of financial loss and a murder conviction.
This dynamic could be explored in studies of white-collar crime and the psychology of influence, particularly how perpetrators maintain support networks despite their actions.
Kouri Richins' mother's statement claimed Richins 'modeled compassion and emotional resilience' in helping her children navigate grief after Eric's death, directly contradicting the children's statements of neglect and abuse during that same period.
This stark contradiction reveals a profound family delusion or a deliberate attempt to rewrite history, suggesting a deep-seated denial or a complete lack of awareness regarding Richins' actual behavior and its impact on her children. It underscores the difficulty in discerning truth when narratives are so diametrically opposed within a family context.
This highlights the challenges in legal proceedings when victim and defense narratives are completely irreconcilable, particularly in cases involving family dynamics and alleged abuse.
Kouri Richins' civil attorneys withdrew en masse after her conviction, leaving her without legal representation for multiple ongoing civil cases.
This situation creates a high likelihood that Richins will be forced to represent herself in complex civil litigation, including disputes over Eric's estate and restitution claims.
Legal analysts and true crime followers can monitor these civil proceedings for unique insights into self-representation by a convicted murderer and the practical challenges it presents.
The judge's decision to impose consecutive sentences, even with a life without parole term, serves a 'protective' function against potential future changes in parole laws.
While seemingly symbolic, this legal strategy ensures that if the life without parole sentence were ever overturned or modified, Richins would still face substantial additional prison time from her other convictions.
This highlights the long-term foresight in judicial sentencing, anticipating legislative shifts and ensuring accountability beyond immediate legal frameworks.
Lessons
- When assessing character in legal proceedings, critically evaluate statements from individuals who have a vested interest or a history of being influenced by the defendant, as their perspectives may be skewed by personal loyalty or past interactions.
- Recognize that a defendant's 'good behavior' in controlled environments like jail, or their pursuit of education, does not automatically equate to genuine remorse or a full understanding of their past actions and their impact on victims.
- Understand that victim impact statements, especially from children, often provide the most direct and unfiltered account of the harm caused, and these should be weighed heavily against generalized character testimonials.
- Understand that a criminal conviction and sentencing, especially in complex cases, rarely signify the end of legal proceedings, with appeals, civil cases, and other charges often continuing for years.
- Recognize the strategic importance of allocution for defendants as their last opportunity to exert control over their narrative in court, even if it deviates from a plea for mitigation.
- Appreciate the multifaceted considerations judges face during sentencing, balancing punishment, victim impact, public safety, and the potential long-term implications for all parties involved.
Notable Moments
Kouri Richins making faces and not listening during her children's victim impact statements.
This visual reaction, noted by the host, suggests a lack of empathy or engagement with the profound trauma her children described, undermining the defense's narrative of her as a loving, devoted mother.
The host's repeated observation that no defense mitigation statement mentioned remorse from Kouri Richins.
This highlights a critical omission in the defense's strategy to humanize Richins and argue for leniency, as genuine remorse is often a key factor considered in sentencing for rehabilitation potential.
The defense's inclusion of an advocate against life without parole who regretted seeking it for her son's killer, despite the Richins family's wishes for a life sentence.
This is a highly unusual and potentially controversial defense tactic, attempting to introduce a broader philosophical argument about sentencing severity that may be perceived as insensitive to the direct victims in the current case.
Kouri Richins's brother, Ronnie, directly addresses Kouri in his statement, expressing personal love and grief, rather than solely addressing the court.
This highlights the deep personal impact of the case on her family and Ronnie's unwavering support for his sister, despite her conviction.
Emily D. Baker notes Kouri Richins's subtle glance towards the judge during her brother's emotional statement.
This observation suggests Kouri's awareness of the court's perception, even during a seemingly personal moment, potentially indicating a calculated performance.
Defense attorney Alex Ramos delivers a highly emotional and religiously charged statement, openly disagreeing with the verdict and court rulings, and invoking God's authority.
This was an unusual and dramatic departure from typical legal arguments, reflecting a deep personal conviction or a strategic attempt to appeal to a higher moral authority in the face of a conviction.
Defense attorney Lewis criticizes the prosecution's sentencing memo as a 'character assassination' and refutes specific allegations, including the status of Kouri's children's life insurance policies.
This moment reveals the contentious nature of the sentencing phase, where new information and character attacks can be introduced, and highlights the defense's efforts to counter negative portrayals.
Kouri Richins delivers her entire allocution as a direct address to her three sons, rather than to the judge, while fully restrained in jail clothes.
This is a highly unconventional and controversial move, demonstrating Richins's priority in communicating with her children and her continued denial of guilt, using the public platform of the court to convey her narrative.
Kouri Richins states, 'I can't give you something that I don't have. An explanation that I just don't know' regarding her husband's death.
This statement is a direct refusal to take accountability or provide details, reinforcing her claim of innocence while acknowledging the children's need for answers.
Kouri Richins' 'whole body' eye roll and defiant facial expressions upon hearing her life without parole sentence.
This reaction, noted by the host, underscored Richins' lack of remorse and her belief in a corrupt system, contrasting sharply with the solemnity of the court and the victim's family's grief.
Amy Richins' media statement being interrupted by someone complaining about blocking the road.
This unexpected interruption highlighted the chaotic and often undignified environment surrounding high-profile court proceedings, even during a victim's family's poignant address.
Quotes
"Today we are going to see what Judge M sentences Cory Richens to. She is facing either 25 years to life or life without parole. The judge can choose either of those options."
"It is famous for how appalling and sickening it is. It is famous because a mother meticulously planned to kill her husband, killed him while their children were sleeping in the next room, and then had the audacity to hold herself out as the author of a children's book about grief and loss."
"He made the heartbreaking decision to stay because he could not accept the risk of what might happen to his sons if Cory had equal custody. He told me he would live his life through hell every single day of his life until his youngest was 18 because he believed Cory was the most evil person he had ever met."
"I received a message sent from a burner phone that said, 'You think you're funny? Cory will get the last laugh.' Your jealousy is as disgusting as your family. Law enforcement later confirmed through warrants that the message came from Corey."
"Eric died trying to be his children's shield. He can no longer protect them. So now the responsibility falls to this court. I ask you to provide these boys with the finality and safety they deserve. I ask you to ensure that the noise of Cory Richens never enters their lives again."
"She took away my dad. It's made me have a hard time trusting people. I was scared that Cory's family would come to my school and take me."
"You took away my dad for no reason other than greed. And you only cared about yourself and your stupid boyfriends. You were not caring and watching over me and my brothers."
"You made me paranoid about sleeping on my dad's side of the bed by saying I might die or get harmed when I was just trying to be close to my dad after you killed him."
"Her story does not end with this sentence. It is the strength of her comeback that will define it."
"Corey has shown no remorse. None of these letters have indicated remorse. Not a single one."
"The Corey I know will thrive where she is. She will trust in her God for peace and she will pray."
"I miss the life that was stolen from us uh for reasons that we can't yet fully understand."
"I disagree with the jury's verdict. I'm deeply saddened by the way that justice was rendered in this case."
"But as a Catholic, there's one authority higher than any courtroom, verdict or government power, and that is God."
"The late Pope Francis said that life without the rule is just a death penalty in disguise because it extinguishes something fundamental to human dignity. That is hope."
"Sending someone to prison without the possibility of parole is to decide they are irredeemable, that they are not capable of change and will never be worthy of our trust again."
"This simply is not the type of crime that we typically see get a sentence of life without parole."
"The state's memo should be stricken in its entirety and not considered by this court."
"My sweet baby boys, I know that today you don't want to speak to me, have a relationship with me, or you may think you hate me, and that's okay."
"Your dad fell in love with someone who wasn't me."
"Never apologize for something you didn't do. Never admit to something you didn't do. And never beg for mercy for something you didn't do."
"I can't give you something that I don't have. An explanation that I just don't know."
"I'm sorry that eight people from a jury who have never met you or me or our family had the right to determine our future and they did that in less than 3 hours."
"God did not put me in this world to take a life. God put me in this world to give life to your lives. And I don't know who or what I'm supposed to be if it's not a mother."
"And as much as you've been influenced into thinking that dad was murdered... that is completely wrong and an absolute lie."
"I will not accept that. And I will not be blamed for something I did not do. I will appeal... I will never quit or give up on this fight for justice, the truth, and coming home to you."
"Corey Richens was convicted unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt of attempting to murder Eric Richens, her husband, and the father of their three children. And then having failed in her first effort... doubling down, preparing to try again, and ultimately completing the act through the administration of poison... All for pecuniary gain... A person convicted of those things is simply too dangerous to ever be free."
"Today, the court recognized that what happened to Eric Richens was not an accident, not unexplained, and not something our family imagined. His life was taken intentionally and permanently, and the consequences of that choice are now being acknowledged in this courtroom."
"Your father mattered. He was completely loved as are you. And no verdict, sentence, or passage of time will erase that."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
LIVE | Kouri Richins Sentencing Memo. So much new info. It's time for prison.
"The Kouri Richins sentencing memo reveals chilling new details, including children's fears and Corey's calculated malice, while a major education software provider, Canvas, pays a ransom after a widespread data breach."
Gen Z Prosecutor Corners Lying Husband with FACTS
"A doctor's meticulously planned attempt to murder his wife on her birthday hike is thwarted by her desperate screams and the timely intervention of two nurses, leading to a dramatic court trial and his eventual conviction."
VERDICT -- UT v. Kouri Richins - Trial Day 15
"Kouri Richins was found guilty on all five counts, including aggravated murder, after less than three hours of jury deliberation, surprising the legal analyst and court observers."
MONSTER MARRIAGE: SURGEON’S ICY THREATS YEARS BEFORE KILLING EX-WIFE & NEW HUBBY, COPS
"A successful vascular surgeon allegedly stalked and emotionally abused his ex-wife for nearly a decade before murdering her and her new husband in their beds, fueled by perceived rejection and mounting legal troubles."