Interviews 02
Interviews 02
February 12, 2026

Richard D. Wolff & Michael Hudson: Is Trump Killing American Capitalism? The 2026 Economic Breakdown

Quick Read

Economists Richard D. Wolff and Michael Hudson dissect how Trump's economic policies, characterized by tariffs and political instability, are actively undermining American manufacturing and global standing, leading to a decline in foreign investment and a shift towards internal repression.
A weaker dollar and tariffs are failing to boost US manufacturing, leading to job losses.
Political instability and policy uncertainty are deterring critical foreign investment.
Rearmament is framed as a tool for internal repression, not just external defense, as empires decline.

Summary

Richard D. Wolff and Michael Hudson analyze the state of American capitalism in early 2026, arguing that Trump's economic strategies, particularly tariffs and a weakening dollar, are detrimental to the US economy. Hudson dismisses the idea that a weaker dollar aids exports, noting the US lacks industrial products, and highlights how it penalizes foreign investment. Wolff points to a 70,000 decline in manufacturing jobs, contrary to the 'reshoring' promise, attributing it to the dollar's decline, domestic political turmoil (like ICE deployments), and policy uncertainty. They cite examples like Mercedes-Benz investing in China over the US and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) facing challenges in Arizona due to labor and deportation concerns. The discussion expands to the broader decline of Western empires, suggesting that the elite's response is increased authoritarianism and rearmament, not against external threats, but to suppress their own working classes and maintain wealth amidst global shifts. They conclude that the current political discourse, including Trump's 'populism,' is a demagogic distraction from the systemic issues of capitalism and growing inequality, with the Epstein scandal serving as a stark metaphor for the 'monsterism' of the ruling class.
This analysis challenges conventional narratives about US economic policy and global power dynamics. It offers a critical perspective on how domestic political actions and the decline of imperial advantages are eroding American economic stability and fostering internal conflict. Understanding these forces is crucial for anyone navigating the current geopolitical and economic landscape, as it suggests a fundamental shift in how wealth and power are maintained, with significant implications for business investment, labor, and social cohesion.

Takeaways

  • Trump's tariffs and a weakening dollar have failed to revive US manufacturing, resulting in a loss of 70,000 manufacturing jobs.
  • Political instability, including ICE deployments and policy uncertainty, actively deters foreign direct investment in the US.
  • The decline of Western empires is leading elites to rearm, not primarily for external threats, but to repress their own working classes and maintain disproportionate wealth.
  • Current 'populist' politics are demagogic, diverting attention from systemic economic inequality and the predatory nature of the financialized economy.

Insights

1Weak Dollar and Tariffs Fail to Boost US Manufacturing

Michael Hudson argues that a weaker dollar does not help the US economy because it lacks industrial products to export competitively. Richard Wolff adds that despite tariffs intended to 'reshore' manufacturing, the US experienced a decline of 70,000 manufacturing jobs in the year leading up to early 2026. Tariffs on raw materials like steel and aluminum make US production prohibitively expensive, deterring foreign investment.

Michael Hudson: 'A weaker dollar... would make industrial exports more competitive... if we had industrial products to export, but we don't.' () Richard Wolff: 'Manufacturing exports from the United States over the year... a decline of 70,000 manufacturing jobs.' ()

2Political Instability and Uncertainty Deter Foreign Investment

Richard Wolff highlights that domestic turmoil, such as ICE deployments in US cities and political uncertainty regarding trade policies (e.g., with Canada), makes the US an unattractive investment destination. Michael Hudson corroborates this with examples of Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen investing in China, citing its more stable political environment, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) struggling with US labor and deportation issues in Arizona.

Richard Wolff: 'What business CEO in his right mind would want to invest in a place where this is going on... the endless uncertainty over this last week... between the United States and Canada.' () Michael Hudson: 'Mercedes and Volkswagen... investing in China... Taiwan came out with a response saying, 'No, we are not going to shift 40% to the United States.'' ()

3Rearmament as a Tool for Internal Repression Amidst Imperial Decline

Richard Wolff posits that as Western empires decline and can no longer extract 'tribute' from former colonies, the top 1-5% of the wealthy elite are becoming more authoritarian. They are increasing defense budgets (e.g., US defense budget rising to $1.5 trillion) and rearming, not primarily to confront foreign adversaries like Russia or China, but to repress their own working classes who will resist the erosion of social welfare.

Richard Wolff: 'The real purpose of the rearmament is to confront its own working class because they're going to have to repress the class that will not comfortably give up the social welfare it has come to rely upon.' ()

4Trump's 'Populism' as Demagogic and Anti-Populist

Michael Hudson argues that Trump's populist rhetoric (e.g., 'Make America Great Again') is 'junk economics' and serves vested financial interests, not the general population. He cites Trump's abolition of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency and his divisive policies targeting non-white groups as evidence that his 'populism' is a strategy to 'accentuate hatred' and prevent genuine democratic protections for labor and consumers.

Michael Hudson: 'Trump's role as as a populist is to prevent every democratic protective agency... he's the exact opposite of a populist.' () 'Trump says, 'Well, it's true that I'm going to lower living standards, but look at the bright side. I'm fighting non-white people.'' ()

Bottom Line

The rearmament of Western nations, particularly the US, is primarily an internal security measure designed to suppress domestic working-class resistance to declining social welfare and increasing inequality, rather than solely a response to external geopolitical threats.

So What?

This reframes the entire geopolitical narrative, suggesting that the 'enemy' is increasingly internal. It implies that military spending is a form of wealth transfer to the military-industrial complex and a tool for social control, rather than national defense.

Impact

This perspective creates an opportunity for new political movements to expose and challenge the true motivations behind defense spending and to unify diverse working-class groups against perceived internal repression, transcending traditional identity politics.

The Epstein scandal, by exposing the 'monsterism' and interconnected corruption of the global elite (overlapping with figures from institutions like Davos), could serve as a revolutionary catalyst for global consciousness, making people question the legitimacy and morality of the ruling class's economic and political power.

So What?

This suggests that moral outrage and the visible depravity of the elite, rather than purely economic analysis, might be the trigger for widespread public disillusionment and a demand for systemic change. It implies that the personal conduct of the powerful can have profound political consequences.

Impact

Activists and critical analysts can leverage such scandals to connect personal corruption to systemic economic and political 'monsterism,' making abstract economic arguments more tangible and emotionally resonant for a broader audience, potentially accelerating a shift in public perception.

Key Concepts

Decline of Empires

The concept that the US and Europe are suffering from the loss of their formal and informal empires, leading to diminished 'tribute' from the rest of the world and the rise of former colonies as competitors. This decline forces internal shifts in how the ruling class maintains wealth and power.

Interregnum (Gramsci)

A period where 'the old world is passing, but the new world has not yet been born,' leading to the creation of 'monsters' (horrific social and political phenomena) in the intermediate stage. This model describes the current global instability and moral decay.

Lessons

  • Critically evaluate 'populist' rhetoric by examining actual policy outcomes and beneficiaries, rather than just slogans.
  • Recognize that increased military spending in declining empires may serve internal repression more than external defense, and question its allocation.
  • Understand that political instability and policy uncertainty are significant deterrents to economic investment, impacting job creation and national competitiveness.
  • Seek out alternative economic analyses that challenge mainstream narratives, especially regarding the long-term implications of capitalism and global power shifts.

Notable Moments

The host notes a significant 10% drop in the US dollar between 2025 and 2026, prompting discussion on its impact.

This sets the immediate economic context for the entire discussion, highlighting a tangible sign of US economic vulnerability and the starting point for the economists' critical analysis of Trump's policies.

Richard Wolff details a decline of 70,000 manufacturing jobs in the US during Trump's second term, directly contradicting the 'reshoring' promise.

This provides concrete evidence that Trump's tariff policies failed to achieve their stated goal of boosting domestic manufacturing, underscoring the ineffectiveness and counterproductive nature of his economic strategy.

The discussion highlights Mercedes-Benz's decision to invest in China over the US, and TSMC's difficulties in Arizona due to labor and deportation issues.

These specific examples illustrate how political instability, policy uncertainty, and labor challenges in the US are actively deterring major foreign investment, directly undermining economic growth and job creation.

Richard Wolff describes how religious communities in Minneapolis are organizing to deliver food and home-school immigrant children to protect them from ICE raids.

This illustrates a grassroots 'resistance' forming in response to government actions, demonstrating the social and humanitarian costs of aggressive immigration policies and the emergence of community-led mutual aid networks in times of crisis.

Quotes

"

"A falling dollar penalizes foreign investment and it doesn't really help US exporters because we don't have that much to export."

Michael Hudson
"

"Manufacturing exports from the United States over the year that we've had Mr. Trump president in his second term and the statistic is a decline of 70,000 manufacturing jobs."

Richard D. Wolff
"

"Uncertainty is as big a factor in their investment location decisions as anything else. Well, Mr. Trump has brought them tremendous uncertainty."

Richard D. Wolff
"

"The real purpose of the rearmament is to confront its own working class because they're going to have to repress the class that will not comfortably give up the social welfare it has come to rely upon."

Richard D. Wolff
"

"The old world is passing, but the new world has not yet been born. And in the intermediate period, monsters are created."

Richard D. Wolff (paraphrasing Antonio Gramsci)
"

"If you don't admit that capitalism is the problem, then your solutions will all be temporary and all fail."

Richard D. Wolff
"

"Epstein was a one-man Davos in effect. So what the coalition he put together is basically almost an identical overlap with Davos."

Michael Hudson

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes