REVEALED: DOGE Had Secret Agreement W/ 'Election Fraud' Org
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Former President Trump continues to assert the 2020 election was rigged, even at the World Economic Forum in Davos, threatening prosecutions.
- ❖A reporter from Lindell TV questioned Trump about Venezuelan election software and Maduro's potential involvement in 2020 election tampering.
- ❖Justice Department court filings revealed that two members of the 'Doge team' within the Social Security Administration were secretly in contact with 'Stop the Steal' organizations.
- ❖One 'Doge team' member signed an agreement that may have involved using Social Security data to match state voter roles.
- ❖The Social Security Administration referred both 'Doge team' employees for potential Hatch Act violations for using official positions for political purposes.
- ❖Previous SSA assertions that the 'Doge team's' work was for fraud detection and agency modernization are now undermined by these revelations.
- ❖Hosts predict that a future Democratic-controlled House Oversight Committee will conduct deep-dive investigations into the 'Doge team's' activities, potentially leading to subpoenas and testimonies under oath.
Insights
1Trump's Persistent Election Fraud Claims
Former President Trump used his World Economic Forum Davos speech to reiterate claims that the 2020 US presidential election was rigged, threatening future prosecutions against those he believes were involved. He also fielded a question from Lindell TV about Venezuelan election software and former President Maduro's alleged role in tampering with the 2020 election, which Trump declined to engage with directly.
Trump's speech at Davos and his response to a reporter's question regarding Maduro and Venezuelan election fraud.
2Doge Team's Secret Data Sharing with 'Stop the Steal' Groups
Justice Department court filings have revealed that two members of the 'Doge team,' working within the Social Security Administration, were secretly communicating with an advocacy group focused on overturning election results. One of these employees signed an agreement that potentially involved using sensitive Social Security data to cross-reference state voter rolls. This directly contradicts the SSA's earlier public statements that the 'Doge team' was focused on detecting fraud, waste, and abuse within Social Security and modernizing the agency's technology.
Court filings disclosed by the Justice Department, as reported by Elizabeth Shapiro, a top Justice Department official. SSA referred the employees for potential Hatch Act violations.
3Legal and Political Fallout for 'Doge Team' Members
The hosts emphasize that being in contact with such an organization while a government employee constitutes a Hatch Act violation, regardless of the specific data shared. They predict that if Democrats regain control of Congress, particularly the House, the House Oversight Committee will initiate extensive investigations into the 'Doge team's' activities. These investigations could involve subpoenaing individuals to testify under oath, and the hosts suggest that former President Trump will not protect or pardon these employees, leaving them exposed to legal consequences.
Hosts' analysis of the Hatch Act implications and the likely actions of a future Democratic-led House Oversight Committee, drawing parallels to past congressional investigations.
Lessons
- Monitor developments in government oversight regarding data privacy and political influence, especially concerning federal agencies and election integrity.
- Be aware of the legal risks faced by government employees who use their official positions for political purposes, as highlighted by potential Hatch Act violations.
- Scrutinize official statements from government agencies regarding the purpose and activities of internal teams, especially when they involve sensitive data, given the 'Doge team's' case.
Quotes
"It was a rigged election. Everybody now knows that. They found out people will soon be prosecuted for what they did."
"Two members of Elon Musk Doge team working at the Social Security Administration were secretly in touch with an advocacy group seeking to overturn election results in certain states and one signed an agreement that may have involved using Social Security data to match state voter roles."
"Even being in touch with the organization is the violation here of the Hatch Act. And it does trace back. I think that this is more of the tip of the iceberg personally."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
Trump Dumps Ice Barbie Kristi Noem. Jasmine Crockett, Dems Expose DHS Scandal In Brutal Hearing.
"Kristi Noem's tenure as DHS Secretary ended amidst brutal congressional hearings exposing alleged corruption, incompetence, and personal scandals, leading to her removal by Trump and subsequent 'promotion' to a special envoy role."
Ro Khanna reaveals BOMBSHELL UPDATE on Epstein files
"Congressman Ro Khanna reveals that 70-80% of the Epstein files he reviewed were still illegally redacted, identifying six prominent men whose identities were protected despite legal mandates for transparency."
MAGA Stooge Freezes After My Question on CNN
"Adam Mockler dissects the Trump administration's claims of 'total victory' in foreign conflicts and its alleged attempts to politicize the Department of Justice, arguing these actions undermine democratic institutions and moral leadership."
They’re talking about 1 to 2 years in Iran
"David Pakman dissects the escalating Iran conflict, the controversial White House ballroom project, and internal political fractures, arguing that Trump's erratic leadership and self-interest are driving concerning national and international developments."