Prosecutor drops BAD NEWS for Pam Bondi

Donald Trump's public directives to prosecute political opponents, such as Jack Smith, are part of a recurring pattern. These attempts, previously aimed at figures like James Comey and Leticia James, have consistently failed in court. The legal basis for such prosecutions is absent, and they often lead to dismissals, as seen with the case against James Comey and the attempted prosecution of Leticia James, which was dismissed due to an unlawfully appointed US attorney.

The cases against James Comey and Leticia James were dismissed. Lindseay Halligan, a 'Trump flunky,' was found not lawfully in her position, leading to a dismissal and her subsequent resignation from the DOJ.

Any Department of Justice official, including Pam Bondi, who initiates prosecutions based on political directives rather than evidence, operates outside the scope of their official duties. This exposes them to personal legal consequences, including disbarment, civil lawsuits, and potential criminal charges for conspiracy. Multiple Trump-associated lawyers have already faced such accountability.

Rudy Giuliani was disbarred in New York and DC. Kenneth Chesebro was disbarred and criminally prosecuted in Georgia. John Eastman and Jeffrey Clark were disbarred. Pam Bondi is specifically mentioned for potential violations related to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, constituting a 'potential conspiracy investigation in the making.'

For federal crimes, the general statute of limitations is five years. However, for a 371 conspiracy (conspiracy to defraud or commit crimes against the United States), the clock does not start until the conspiracy is over. This means that if officials like Pam Bondi are involved in an ongoing conspiracy to commit politically motivated prosecutions, their liability could extend indefinitely as long as the actions continue.

The federal statute for conspiracy (371) is broad, and its statute of limitations 'doesn't even start to run until the conspiracy is over.' The host states this 'potential conspiracy is ongoing' and 'will continue for as long as Donald Trump is in power and as long as Pam Bondi is the attorney general.'

The hosts express strong criticism of Merrick Garland's Department of Justice, arguing that its cautious approach, aimed at avoiding accusations of politicization, has paradoxically undermined public confidence and legitimacy. They contend that a failure to aggressively hold wrongdoers accountable, particularly high-profile figures, sends a message that justice is not applied equally, thereby eroding the rule of law.

The host states, 'if we don't learn from the lessons of the past, particularly the failure of Merrick Garland's Department of Justice to aggressively hold Trump and company accountable... we will lose our republic.' He argues that Garland's approach has led to the DOJ losing 'all legitimacy.'