LEGO Scandal Explodes as YouTuber ‘Reckless Ben’ is Arrested Twice
YouTube · OmpNxnhVwDk
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖YouTuber 'Reckless Ben' investigated a $200,000 Lego collection theft by Bricks and Minifigs executives.
- ❖Ben helped the original owner sue the corporate owners, winning a judgment they allegedly avoided by closing the Oregon store.
- ❖Ben then pursued a personal lawsuit against executives Joshua Johnson and Brandon Best in Utah.
- ❖His methods included sending proxies to Johnson's home, one of whom wore a fake UPS uniform to attempt service.
- ❖Ben was arrested on March 10th for stalking after placing a sign with Johnson's face and a defamatory message near his home.
- ❖He was arrested a second time on March 11th for an additional stalking charge after his 'crew' displayed similar signs on a neighbor's fence and attempted a GoFundMe video.
- ❖Police stated their role was to enforce Utah law regarding harassment, trespassing, and stalking, not to resolve the Oregon business dispute.
- ❖Ben claims police bodycam footage was redacted and that his actions were satire and protected free speech aimed at raising money for the victim.
Insights
1The Original Lego Dispute and Subsequent Lawsuit
A family's $200,000 Lego collection, including a rare Star Wars set, was placed with a Bricks and Minifigs store in Oregon under a consignment agreement. According to Ben, the collection disappeared, and the family received no money. They sued the corporate owners, Joshua Johnson and Brandon Best, and won. However, the corporate owners allegedly closed the Oregon store to avoid paying the judgment, prompting Ben to file a new lawsuit against them personally in Utah.
Ben is investigating and he helps the owner of this collection sue the corporate owners of Bricks and Minigs and they apparently win. But according to Ben, the corporate owners to avoid paying the judgment, they close the Oregon store. Now Ben tells police that he filed a new lawsuit. This time against the owners personally.
2Ben Schneider's Initial Tactics and First Arrest
Ben traveled to Utah to serve legal papers to Johnson and Best. His tactics included sending a proxy, Benjamin Adams, who initially claimed to be picking up a friend for a date but later admitted to filming for Ben. Another proxy, Christian Morgan, was sent to Johnson's door, claiming to be from a 'young men's group' and discussing an 'audio going around' about Johnson taking advantage of people. Morgan admitted Ben sent him to 'confront him and get his side of the story.' Ben himself, while driving, was pulled over and admitted to wearing a UPS hat and asking Johnson to sign for a package, which an officer identified as a potential federal crime. Ben was first arrested on March 10th for stalking after placing a sign across from Johnson's house that read, 'I stole a dying man's life savings.'
Joshua Johnson calls American Fork PD and he says that a suspicious person just showed up at his house. Person's apparently wearing a baseball cap with a UPS logo taped onto it and he left a package. inside that package reportedly rubber ducks. Johnson tells the dispatcher that he thinks it's Ben Schneider... [] ...Ben Schneider. Okay. So, he sent you today, correct? asked you to be a third party leaison with him. Okay. So, he was trespassing this residence yesterday. He's using you third party to console. That's ending you up in the same trouble that he's in now. [] ...Ben reportedly admitted that he put it there. That is when the officer told him that he was kind of straddling the line here. [] ...We're under arrest right now for stalking.
3Second Arrest and GoFundMe Strategy
On March 11th, Johnson called police again, reporting a group hanging the same defamatory message on a neighbor's fence. One individual was on FaceTime with Ben Schneider. Ben explained to police that he intended to create a viral video for a GoFundMe campaign to raise the $200,000 for the family, believing direct civil action was not working. He claimed his actions were 'satire' and protected by freedom of speech, especially since the signs were on a neighbor's property with permission. Despite his arguments, Ben was arrested again for an additional stalking charge, as police viewed these actions as a continuation of the pattern.
Now, there's a group of people reportedly hanging the same message on a neighbor's fence. Johnson's face. I stole a dying man's life savings. And one of them, they say, is on FaceTime with Ben Schneider. [] ...So, let's do a GoFundMe. I have a big following. I've I'm very confident if I made a GoFundMe, we would get him the $200,000 just from a GoFundMe. [] ...our plan kind of moving forward is we're going to book you back into the jail. Okay. For an additional stocking charge.
4American Fork Police Department's Stance
The American Fork Police Department issued a statement addressing the online controversy, clarifying that their responsibility was to enforce Utah law regarding harassment, trespassing, and stalking, not to determine the moral right or wrong of an out-of-state business dispute. They emphasized that perceived financial wrongdoing does not exempt individuals from local laws and that officers acted based on probable cause that a crime had occurred.
Our responsibility in Utah was not to determine who was morally right or wrong in a business disagreement originating in another state. Our responsibility was to respond to conduct reported here in our community, evaluate the facts available to our officers at the time, and enforce Utah law as officers established probable cause that a crime had occurred. The fact that someone may believe they have been wronged financially does not exempt any individual from the laws governing harassment, trespassing, stalking, or other conduct within our jurisdiction.
Lessons
- Understand the legal limits of 'investigative' content creation: While exposing wrongdoing can be impactful, actions like repeated visits to private residences, sending proxies, or displaying inflammatory signs can cross into criminal offenses like stalking or harassment.
- Consult legal counsel when pursuing civil disputes: Do not attempt to serve legal papers or pressure defendants through methods that could be interpreted as intimidation or harassment, as this can lead to criminal charges and complicate the original case.
- Be aware of local laws regarding protest and free speech: Even with permission, displaying signs that target individuals at their residence can be considered 'residential picketing,' which is a class B misdemeanor in Utah, and may not be protected under general free speech rights.
Notable Moments
Benjamin Adams, a driver for Ben Schneider, initially claimed to be picking up a friend for a date but later admitted to police he was filming for Ben Schneider for money, despite having past trespassing charges.
This reveals Ben's use of proxies and Adams' willingness to engage in potentially legally risky activities for payment, highlighting the methods employed in the 'investigation' and the potential legal vulnerability of those involved.
Ben Schneider explained his YouTube content to an officer during a traffic stop, detailing past 'investigations' into cults and even 'stealing' a haunted house business from an alleged torturer through a legal loophole.
This interaction provides insight into Ben's self-perception as an 'investigative' content creator who pushes boundaries, and it foreshadows his approach to the Lego dispute.
Christian Morgan, a proxy sent by Ben, admitted to police that Ben Schneider had sent him to confront Joshua Johnson, despite Ben's later claims of not knowing his proxies well.
This directly links Ben to the actions of his proxies, undermining his later defense that he was not directly involved or responsible for their conduct.
Ben Schneider explained his GoFundMe strategy to police, stating that civil lawsuits were ineffective and that a viral video with a 'funny sign' was necessary to raise the $200,000 for the family, framing his actions as satire and protected free speech.
This reveals Ben's rationale for his controversial methods, highlighting a belief that internet virality and public pressure are more effective than traditional legal channels, and his interpretation of legal boundaries.
Quotes
"Our responsibility in Utah was not to determine who was morally right or wrong in a business disagreement originating in another state. Our responsibility was to respond to conduct reported here in our community, evaluate the facts available to our officers at the time, and enforce Utah law as officers established probable cause that a crime had occurred."
"The fact that someone may believe they have been wronged financially does not exempt any individual from the laws governing harassment, trespassing, stalking, or other conduct within our jurisdiction."
"So right now you're straddling the line of what we call stalking."
"Yeah. But the what the law says is if the average person would feel unsafe by our behaviors. So I think he's feeling unreasonably unsafe. A reasonable person would not feel unsafe in the situation."
"You cannot be putting up signs in our photos of his face in front of his house with information like that. Isn't that freedom of speech?"
"It's a coloss misdemeanor with his shirt on my pocket."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes

LEMON DROP | Kamala Harris Speaks Out, Ashley St. Clair Drops Bombshells & Newsom Fires Back
"Kamala Harris, Ashley St. Clair, and Don Lemon dissect the weaponization of the Department of Justice, corporate smear tactics, and the controversial White House invitation for the NBA champions."

Elon Musk’s Scathing Reaction to Grooming Report Goes Viral Fast
"Dave Rubin dissects the alarming British grooming scandal, Elon Musk's viral reaction, and the controversial Iran peace deal, arguing that Western nations are sacrificing their values and security due to political correctness and a failure to confront uncomfortable truths."

The Joe Budden Podcast Episode 925 | At Risk Youth Diet
"The JBP crew navigates a chaotic mix of stolen Dr. Peppers, NBA playoff drama, the ethics of public suffering, and a Supreme Court ruling, all while debating the future of classic albums and celebrity conduct."

“You’re A JOKE!” Trump Shooting Debate & Free Speech ‘Hypocrisy’ | With Cenk Uygur & Glenn Beck
"Piers Morgan and guests debate the political implications of King Charles's US visit, the Secret Service's failures in protecting Donald Trump, the surge in political violence, and the controversial figure of Tommy Robinson."