“Mercy!” - JSOC Tier 1 Operator: Taking a Life, Shadow Gov & Bin Laden Debate | Chad Robichaux • 412

Chad Robichaux asserts that the US government's decision to withdraw its consulate, embassy, and troops from Ukraine before the Russian invasion was a deliberate act, effectively giving Putin a 'green light.' This action, he argues, allowed for a conflict that has since funneled hundreds of billions of dollars into weapons manufacturing, with 80% of US aid remaining in the US for defense contractors. He views this as a prime example of war profiteering by the military-industrial complex.

Robichaux states, 'President Biden made the decision to remove our our US consulate, our embassy, and our troops out of out of Ukraine, which allowed for the article 50 violation not to be there. the rest of the western world followed suit and Putin came across the border and now hundreds of billions of dollars have been • spent on this war... 80% of it stayed back here 20% of it has went to Ukraine.'

The US government is reportedly sending $80 million weekly to the Taliban. Half of this, $40 million, is designated for humanitarian aid but is allegedly misused by the Taliban as a tool of power. The other $40 million is cash for 'counterterrorism' and is delivered to individuals on the FBI's Most Wanted List, including Bin Laden's son. This funding also includes a 'Taliban martyr fund,' providing houses, property, and $1,000 monthly to families of Taliban members killed by US forces, a stark contrast to the support for US Gold Star families.

Robichaux explains, 'We could send them I couldn't do that to evacuate Americans, but we could send them $80 million a week and have been doing it for for three years now... The other 40 million is for, get this, the other 40 million is in cash and it's for counterterrorism. That cash is delivered to four locations. And all four locations, the people that that run those four locations are all on the FBI's top 10 most wanted list. One of them has housed • prison, American prisoners, the whole time. And one of them is is Bin Laden's Bin Laden's son.' He adds, 'Inside that money there's a Taliban mortar fund... every Taliban member that was killed by a US service member during the war on terror is given is given a house property in a in a thousand dollars of US dollars tax US taxpayer dollars a month as a martyr fund.'

Robichaux posits that the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan was not merely incompetence but a deliberate action to grant China access to Afghanistan's vast lithium mineral rights in the Hindu Kush mountains (estimated at hundreds of trillions of dollars) and to facilitate the movement of sanctioned Iranian oil through Afghanistan to China. He notes that China secured these mineral rights within a week of the US withdrawal and took over Bagram Air Force Base, along with an estimated $80 billion in abandoned US equipment.

Robichaux states, 'China wanted to be able to move sanctioned oil from Iran across the across Afghanistan to China... China wanted access to the mineral rights in the Hindu Kush mountains. The lithium mineral rights is worth, they say, hundreds of trillions of dollars... we left in August 31st and • and by the first week of September, China had the mineral rights mineral rights.' He speculates, 'I think I think we owed we owe China a debt to the Biden family • for personal business and for the election.'

During his eight deployments to Afghanistan, Robichaux observed that pedophilia, particularly involving young boys, is a systemic and generational issue within Taliban culture. He notes the disturbing contradiction of a group fighting a 'jihad war' with spiritual fervor while engaging in such vile practices, and highlights the lack of international outcry for the millions of Afghan women and girls subjected to forced marriage and sexual abuse.

Robichaux states, 'Women are for babies and boys are for for for fun... these little boys especially like in • within the Taliban these little boys are generationally like like raped like as as boys and then they turn around and do it to the next generation. So, it's it's rampant.' He questions, 'Where's the me too movement? Where's the • human rights people for them?'

Robichaux recounts his first fatal shooting as a police officer in New Orleans, where he was forced to kill a man in self-defense during a domestic violence call. The experience, marked by the victim's last words, the presence of his screaming wife and shocked children, and the subsequent grand jury investigation, left a profound and lasting personal trauma, which he considers more impactful than his combat experiences.

Robichaux describes, 'He literally looked over his shoulders and made eye contact with me and he said, 'You killed me.' And • I I just pushed him down... his wife's screaming and his kids look like we're just like in shock.' He later reflects, 'It is probably personally the most traumatic thing • that I've ever experienced. It's just the proximity of it. It was so personal.'