Candace Owens
Candace Owens
March 24, 2026

REVEALED: Erika Went To A Weird Place On 9/10 | Candace Ep 315

Quick Read

Candace Owens reveals new 'explosive' details about Erica's alleged secret location on September 10th and further scrutinizes Andrew Kolbet's alibi, suggesting a coordinated cover-up in the Charlie Kirk 'assassination' case.
Erica was allegedly at an unmarked 'Hopkinson Aircrafts' building when she learned of Charlie's death, an entity the host suspects is a 'CIA front.'
Andrew Kolbet's flight alibi is challenged by Wi-Fi availability on his claimed plane, suggesting he was on Charlie's plane instead.
Andrew's past record of faking live shows casts doubt on his September 10th alibi.

Summary

Candace Owens continues her investigation into the alleged 'assassination' of Charlie Kirk, focusing on new 'explosive' information about Erica's whereabouts on September 10th. Owens claims Erica was at an unmarked, obscure building belonging to 'Hopkinson Aircrafts,' a luxury aircraft brokerage that operates without its own address, which Owens speculates could be a 'CIA front.' She also further debunks Andrew Kolbet's alibi regarding his flight from Santa Barbara to Provo, presenting evidence that the plane he claimed to be on (the 'Barbara plane') had Wi-Fi, contradicting his statement of being unreachable due to no internet. Owens suggests Andrew likely flew on Charlie's plane, which she believes lacked Wi-Fi. She also raises suspicions about Andrew's alibi of guest-hosting a live show on September 10th, citing his past instance of faking a live show for an alibi. The host critiques the official narrative and those who dismiss her investigation as conspiracy theories, demanding transparency from Erica and Andrew.
This episode continues to challenge the official narrative surrounding Charlie Kirk's death by introducing new, highly speculative details about key individuals' actions and locations. It highlights the host's methodology of public investigation, crowdsourcing information, and scrutinizing inconsistencies in official or stated accounts. For those following the 'Charlie Kirk assassination' theory, these 'revelations' aim to deepen suspicions of a cover-up and coordinated deception by those close to Kirk.

Takeaways

  • Erica was allegedly at an unmarked 'Hopkinson Aircrafts' building in Scottsdale when she received news of Charlie's death, a location the host describes as 'secretive' and potentially a 'CIA front.'
  • Andrew Kolbet's alibi for being on a plane without Wi-Fi is challenged, as the 'Barbara plane' he allegedly flew on had Wi-Fi, suggesting he was on Charlie's plane which likely did not.
  • The host questions the authenticity of Andrew Kolbet's live show alibi on September 10th, referencing a previous instance where he faked a live broadcast.
  • The official narrative of Charlie Kirk's death is continuously dismissed by the host as incomplete and misleading, with key figures refusing to address 'major inconsistencies.'
  • The host criticizes those who dismiss her investigation as 'conspiracy theories,' accusing them of 'bad faith debating' by focusing on minor errors instead of core allegations.

Insights

1Erica's Alleged Secret Location on September 10th

The host received a 'tip' that Erica was at the office of 'Hopkinson Aircrafts' in Scottsdale when she learned of Charlie Kirk's death. This company is a luxury aircraft brokerage located in an obscure, unmarked building separate from the main FBO terminal, using the FBO's address for mail. The host finds this location highly suspicious, questioning why Erica would be there and suggesting it feels like a 'CIA front.'

Unconfirmed tip received by the host, public Google search for Hopkinson Aircrafts' address, and an anonymous inquiry confirming the separate, unmarked building location. Erica's prior statements about receiving the news before flying to Provo.

2Andrew Kolbet's Disputed Flight Alibi

The host challenges Andrew Kolbet's claim of being on a plane without Wi-Fi on September 10th. Erica stated Andrew was on the 'Barbara plane' (N8724A), a Hawker Beechcraft. However, the host confirmed with the charter company that 'all of our planes have Wi-Fi,' including the Barbara plane. This contradicts Andrew's text message stating he couldn't respond because he was on a plane without internet. The host posits Andrew was likely on Charlie's plane (a G5), which, while Wi-Fi capable, Charlie likely wouldn't have used due to astronomical costs ($300k install, $30-50k/month).

Andrew's text message at PM (Utah time) saying 'you're going to have to wait until Andrew's on the ground' and later 'My internet just came back on.' Confirmation from the charter company for N8724A that 'All of our planes have Wi-Fi.' Analysis of Charlie's plane (G5) Wi-Fi cost.

3Andrew Kolbet's Potentially Faked Live Show Alibi

Andrew Kolbet claims to have guest-hosted the first hour of the 'Charlie Kirk Live Show' on September 10th, serving as an alibi for his whereabouts. The host expresses suspicion, citing a previous instance where Andrew faked a live show while actually visiting the White House the day before the Epstein files were released. She is seeking confirmation from the interviewed guest, Nick Shirley, whether the September 10th show was indeed live.

Andrew's own account to a New York Times reporter (Ross Douthat) about guest-hosting the show (). Host's prior reporting on Andrew faking a live show while at the White House ().

4Critique of the Official Narrative and 'Overwhelming Evidence' Claims

The host and her guest, Baron Coleman, criticize those who defend the official narrative of Charlie Kirk's death, particularly Blake Neff and Andrew Kolbet, for using 'bad faith debating' tactics. They argue that these individuals focus on minor errors in the host's investigation to dismiss the entire case, rather than addressing major inconsistencies. The host refutes claims of 'overwhelming evidence' against Tyler Robinson, pointing out that the murder weapon's firing cannot be proven, the confession tape is missing, and Tyler is actively fighting prosecutors.

Baron Coleman's monologue on bad-faith debating (). Host's direct refutation of Blake Neff and Andrew Kolbet's arguments regarding Tyler Robinson's guilt and the 'mountain of evidence' (, ).

Bottom Line

The host speculates that 'Hopkinson Aircrafts,' a luxury aircraft brokerage operating from an unmarked building without its own address, feels like a 'CIA front.'

So What?

This implies a deeper, potentially government-level involvement in the events surrounding Charlie Kirk's death, suggesting Erica was at a secure, covert location rather than a public one.

Impact

Further investigation into the ownership, operations, and historical activities of 'Hopkinson Aircrafts' could reveal connections to intelligence agencies or other non-commercial entities, potentially uncovering a larger network.

The alleged 'Wi-Refi plane' Andrew Kolbet supposedly took from Santa Barbara to Scottsdale in the first leg of his journey was marketed in 2020 with a 'satellite phone' but no Wi-Fi.

So What?

This supports the host's theory that Andrew was unreachable due to lack of Wi-Fi on his initial flight, further complicating his alibi and suggesting a deliberate choice of a non-connected aircraft for the first leg.

Impact

Cross-referencing flight manifests and communication logs for planes equipped only with satellite phones during that period could potentially identify the actual aircraft Andrew was on, if he was indeed flying.

Key Concepts

Bad Faith Debating / Gotcha Argument

Described by Baron Coleman, this tactic involves the losing side fixating on a single outdated data point or minor error, hammering it as proof of incompetence, and prematurely declaring victory while ignoring the larger argument, expert consensus, or their own contradictions. It's a 'surgical strike' to derail the main point, often resembling quibbling or cherry-picking, rather than addressing the substance.

Lessons

  • When evaluating complex narratives, be wary of 'bad faith debating' tactics that focus on minor errors to discredit an entire argument, rather than addressing core inconsistencies.
  • Scrutinize alibis, especially from individuals with a history of deceptive practices, by cross-referencing claims with verifiable facts like flight data and communication logs.
  • Recognize that a company operating from an unmarked building without its own address, especially in a sensitive industry like private aviation, could warrant deeper investigation beyond its stated business purpose.
  • Demand specific answers to major inconsistencies in public narratives, rather than accepting vague responses or diversions to minor details.

Notable Moments

The host details her process of investigating 'Hopkinson Aircrafts' by sending an anonymous contact to inquire about their office location, revealing it's a separate, unmarked building without its own address.

This demonstrates the host's investigative methodology and provides a concrete example of how she unearthed the 'secretive' nature of the location where Erica allegedly received news of Charlie's death.

The host calls a charter company to confirm Wi-Fi capabilities on the 'Barbara plane' (N8724A), directly debunking Andrew Kolbet's alibi of being unreachable due to lack of internet.

This provides direct, verifiable evidence that contradicts a key part of Andrew Kolbet's explanation for his unresponsiveness, strengthening the host's claim of a fabricated alibi.

Quotes

"

"It's frankly a low IQ strategy of attempting to win a debate on a technicality that you're obviously losing. It's a gotcha gotcha argument."

Baron Coleman
"

"I've long explained to you that one of the things that is so odd to me is that nobody nobody saw Erica on the day of Charlie's assassination."

Candace Owens
"

"It felt to me like a CIA front if I'm being honest. That's an opinion. It felt to me like this is not a real business, but it needs to present like it's a real business for some reason."

Candace Owens
"

"You do not describe that plane as a massive plane."

Candace Owens
"

"You think telling the truth betrays Charlie, you were never a friend of his."

Candace Owens

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes