Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖FCC Chair Brendan Carr launched 'Pledge America' to encourage patriotic broadcasting, including daily Star-Spangled Banner or Pledge of Allegiance.
- ❖The host criticizes Carr for simultaneously attacking media outlets like Jimmy Kimmel, Stephen Colbert, 60 Minutes, and The View.
- ❖Carr is re-enforcing the 'equal time' rule, specifically investigating 'The View' for not meeting regulatory requirements.
- ❖The host argues Carr's actions, including potential media consolidation favoring pro-Trump entities, contradict free speech principles.
- ❖The episode highlights a perceived hypocrisy in the right's stance on media freedom, shifting from advocating free speech to attempting to control it.
Insights
1FCC Chair Brendan Carr's 'Pledge America' Campaign
FCC Chair Brendan Carr initiated the 'Pledge America' campaign, urging broadcasters to air more 'pro-America' patriotic programming, such as starting each day with the Star-Spangled Banner or the Pledge of Allegiance. This campaign is framed as a way to celebrate America's 250th birthday.
Carr announced the 'Pledge America' campaign, encouraging broadcasters to air more pro-America content such as starting each day with the Star-Spangled Banner or the Pledge of Allegiance.
2Targeting of Media Outlets by Carr
The host details how Carr has waged a 'pressure campaign' against specific media figures and outlets, including Jimmy Kimmel, Stephen Colbert, and 60 Minutes. Additionally, 'The View' is under FCC investigation regarding an interview with James Terico, with Carr asserting it didn't meet 'equal time' regulatory requirements, questioning its status as a 'bonafide news program'.
Since Trump took office, Carr has waged a pressure campaign to silence Jimmy Kimmel, to get Steven Colbert cancelled, to force a payout from 60 Minutes. And now he'll have a hand in approving the multi-billion dollar sale of Warner Brothers to the Trump-loving David Ellison run Paramount... Along with Carr's other targets, The View is currently under investigation by the FCC over an interview with James Terico, saying it didn't meet regulatory requirements that would have allowed James' opponents to see comparable time.
3Contradiction in Free Speech Stance
The host argues that Carr's actions and the broader conservative movement's current stance on media control contradict their past strong advocacy for free speech. He highlights previous conservative concerns about 'language police' and 'dangerous trends against free speech,' contrasting them with current efforts to dictate media content and silence dissenting voices.
The reality is all of this media censorship on the right is pretty surprising considering the way they felt not too long ago. 'But I've noticed the dangerous trend against free speech in recent years.' 'What am I now not allowed to say?' 'The language police. A phenomenon particularly of the left.'
Lessons
- Be aware of how government officials, like the FCC Chair, can influence media content and narratives through campaigns and regulatory actions.
- Critically evaluate claims of 'patriotism' in media, especially when accompanied by efforts to silence or investigate dissenting voices.
- Support independent media outlets and creators to ensure diverse perspectives remain accessible, particularly in an environment of potential media consolidation and political pressure.
Quotes
"We're in the midst of a a great period of time here in DC, a great revival, a golden age. Just this week, we had the State of the Union where President Trump, I mean, truly the political colossus of our time. Show the American people exactly why he's delivering these great results. Prices are down."
"Long ago, Congress passed a law and they didn't want media gatekeepers to be deciding the outcomes of elections by having exclusively, you know, one political candidate or one political party on all the time. So, they said you have to give equal time to both. Now, over the years, the FCC effectively walked away from enforcing that, and I don't think that was a good thing."
"Real patriotism is not shutting down the voices you disagree with, but rather reveling in the fact that we live in a democracy where people have the freedom to express those disagreements."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes

LIVE: Ben Meiselas RESPONDS to BREAKING NEWS!! 2/24/2026
"The Midas Touch Network boycotts the official State of the Union, hosting an alternative event while exposing alleged financial grifts, DOJ cover-ups of Epstein files, and the Pentagon's push for unregulated AI mass surveillance."

Krystal And Saagar REACT Olympic Athletes Trash America
"Krystal and Saagar dissect the right-wing outrage over American Olympic athletes expressing mild criticism of the US, arguing it exposes a 'fragility' in those demanding unquestioning patriotism."

“I’d Rather DIE Than Bend The Knee!” Megyn Kelly, Scott Galloway & More On Super Bowl Show
"This episode dissects the extreme political and cultural polarization in America, from the Super Bowl halftime show controversy to economic activism and political memes, revealing deep societal divides."

Joe Rogan Experience #2444 - Andrew Wilson
"Andrew Wilson, a former robotics mechanic turned political commentator, discusses the weaponization of political narratives, the decline of societal norms, and the importance of a Christian ethical framework in navigating modern chaos."