Jury deliberating now! Au pair double murder - who will the jury believe?
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Brendan Banfield is accused of plotting with au pair Juliana Perez to murder his wife Christine and Joseph Ryan in 2023.
- ❖Banfield testified for over two hours, denying any plan to kill his wife and claiming he shot Ryan in self-defense after finding him attacking Christine.
- ❖He admitted to a 2022 affair with Juliana, which he said began when his wife was out of town.
- ❖During testimony, Banfield stated 'there was no plan at this point' regarding gun range visits, a statement the host identified as a potential 'slip up' given his overall denial of a plan.
- ❖Banfield described returning home to sounds he initially thought were consensual sex, then realized were forceful impacts and painful moans.
- ❖He stated he found Christine nude and on all fours with Ryan behind her, who had a knife to Christine's neck.
- ❖Banfield claimed Christine said, 'Brendan, he has a knife,' and he fired his gun after Ryan made a 'forceful stab' towards Christine.
- ❖He testified that Juliana, his au pair, later fired a second shot with his other firearm.
- ❖Under cross-examination, Banfield admitted he had not told this self-defense story to police or in previous court hearings over three years, citing legal advice.
- ❖The prosecutor questioned why he couldn't pull the trigger earlier, despite Christine allegedly being stabbed multiple times before he fired.
Insights
1Defendant's Self-Defense Narrative vs. Au Pair's Accusation
Brendan Banfield testified he returned home to find his wife, Christine, being attacked by Joseph Ryan, who held a knife to her neck. Banfield claimed he shot Ryan in self-defense after Ryan made a 'forceful stab' at Christine. This directly contradicts the au pair Juliana Perez's testimony, who is helping the state and claims Banfield created the plan, stabbed his wife, and staged the crime scene.
Banfield's testimony details finding Christine nude and Ryan clothed with a knife, Christine's cry for help, and his subsequent firing of his weapon. Juliana Perez previously testified Banfield created the plan and stabbed Christine.
2The 'No Plan at This Point' Slip Up
During his testimony, while denying a murder plot, Banfield discussed taking Juliana to a gun range. When asked if there was a plan for her to 'back him up,' he stated, 'there was no plan at this point when we had gone to the range.' This phrasing, 'at this point,' was highlighted by the host as a potential 'slip up' because Banfield consistently denied any plan ever existed.
Banfield's direct quote: 'I mean, there there was no plan at this point when we had gone to the range.' He then listed other elements (email accounts, FetLife, Telegram) that 'did not exist at the point that we went to the range.'
3Three Years of Silence on Self-Defense Claim
The prosecution aggressively questioned Banfield about his failure to provide his self-defense narrative to police or in any previous court proceedings over the three years since the murders. Banfield stated he was not questioned at the scene or hospital and was advised by his attorney not to disclose details at Juliana's preliminary hearing.
Prosecutor Jenna Sans's cross-examination: 'This is the first time you've told this story or any story about what happened in the bedroom on February 24th, 2023. Correct?' Banfield replied, 'Yes.' He further confirmed he didn't tell police at the house, driveway, hospital, or station, and was advised by his attorney not to discuss 'defense of others' at preliminary hearings.
Notable Moments
Brendan Banfield, a defendant in a high-profile double murder case, takes the stand to testify.
It is rare for defendants in such cases to testify, making his decision a significant event that could sway the jury, especially as he directly contradicts the state's key witness.
Banfield's 'slip up' during testimony where he states 'there was no plan at this point' when discussing gun range visits with the au pair.
This phrasing could be interpreted by the jury as an admission that a plan developed later, undermining his consistent denial of any murder plot.
The prosecution's cross-examination highlights Banfield's three-year silence regarding his self-defense story.
This challenges Banfield's credibility, as a delay in reporting such a critical defense could be seen as an attempt to fabricate a story.
Quotes
"I mean, there there was no plan at this point when we had gone to the range."
"This is the first time you've told this story or any story about what happened in the bedroom on February 24th, 2023. Correct?"
"I was advised that uh that defense of others or is not relevant for is not relevant for uh preliminary hearings and it was my intention that I was going to testify at Juliana's trial."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
Kohberger’s Back, More Dirty Duggar Details & Quad Amputee Charged with Murder
"Newly released surveillance footage of Bryan Kohberger at the DMV, unsettling details of a triple murder by Jenna Struble, and the perplexing case of a quadruple amputee charged with murder are explored."
Nancy Guthrie Investigation Mess, Shock Lawsuit Against "The Tell" Author, Kouri Richins Bombshells
"Megyn Kelly and her legal panel dissect a bombshell lawsuit against author Amy Griffin for allegedly stealing a sexual assault story, the ongoing Kouri Richins murder trial involving fentanyl poisoning, and a harrowing IVF clinic mix-up where parents received the wrong baby."
How Detectives Expose a Narcissist
"This episode dissects the chilling interrogation of a self-proclaimed victim turned murderer, revealing how detectives masterfully exploit narcissistic traits to secure a confession."
Missing Girl’s ‘Party Mom’ Under Investigation for Murder
"A mother initially arrested for severe child abuse of one daughter is now under investigation for the capital murder of another daughter, Ava Gonzales, who has been missing for a decade, with police alleging a 14-year-old son witnessed the fatal assault."