OMINOUS: Bibi Claims Al-Aqsa THREATENED By Iran

Netanyahu asserted that Iranian ballistic missile fragments striking near Jerusalem's Old City, specifically 400 yards from the Western Wall and Al-Aqsa Mosque, constituted an attack on holy sites and civilians. He used this to declare Iran an 'enemy of civilization' and a danger to the world, explicitly framing the conflict as a 'holy war' and a reason to involve other nations.

Netanyahu's speech stating, 'If anyone needed an explanation of why Iran is the enemy of civilization... you got it in the last 48 hours. They fired on Jerusalem right next to the holy places. They sent ballistic missiles that could have destroyed the church of the holy sepulchre. The three holiest sites to the three monotheistic religions.'

The hosts expressed strong skepticism about Netanyahu's claims, particularly his condemnation of Iran for targeting civilians and using cluster bombs. They highlighted Israel's own documented history of using cluster munitions in Lebanon and questioned the moral authority of Israeli leaders to lecture the world on civilian life, especially after events like the assassination of an Iranian head of state and alleged bombings of schoolgirls by Americans.

The host states, 'the Israelis would never use cluster munitions right except like multiple confirmed times over Lebanon... anything from this man talking about, oh my god, civilian, like you opened this box, like you have no room to talk.'

The hosts brought up a video of a controversial rabbi from 2024 suggesting that Israel could 'pretend that there was an attack on Al-Aqsa' to use it as an excuse to rebuild the Third Temple. They explicitly questioned whether Israeli leaders would engage in such tactics if it benefited them, linking it to the influence of religious fanatics in the government and the convergence of Jewish extremist and American evangelical eschatology regarding the Third Temple.

A rabbi's quote: 'Maybe one of the missiles will hit the mosque and clear the place for the third beta mikdash. That could also be a miracle.' Followed by the host's comment: 'Do you put this past the Israelis? You think they wouldn't do something like this? If they thought it would benefit them, they absolutely would.'

The hosts discussed the 'Greater Israel' project, noting that what was once considered a 'nut job' theory now appears to be a tangible objective. They cited a US ambassador's unchallenged affirmation to Tucker Carlson that the US would be 'cool' with Israel taking territory encompassing parts or whole of multiple countries, aligning with biblical interpretations of Israel's land.

The host states, 'Now you look at Syria, you look at Lebanon, you look at the West Bank, you look at Gaza... And you've got our own ambassador being asked again by Tucker Carlson, hey, you know, the Bible says th this is the area that Israel is supposed to make up. You cool if they take that that area... He's like, yes, they do that. That's fine.'

The hosts argue that Netanyahu, despite being a secular individual, deliberately employs religious rhetoric (e.g., 'children of the light and the children of the darkness') to manipulate the masses and justify actions that are otherwise unjustifiable. This framing, they contend, reinforces a supremacist view that Israel is inherently 'good' and its enemies 'evil', allowing for the justification of war crimes and aggression.

The host states, 'Netanyahu is by all accounts a a secular um person... But is he happy to use you know people's genuine religious views and fanaticism frankly? Is he happy to use that for his war aims? Of course he is. So it's like any other sort of sigh up. It's a tool to manipulate the masses.'