“This Is a HORROR!” Alex Pretti Death Sparks ICE Frenzy | With Vincent Oshana

Alex Prey, a 37-year-old intensive care nurse, was killed at an ICE protest. Piers Morgan frames this as a 'horror' and an 'unjustified killing,' noting that Prey was not a domestic terrorist and did not deserve to die. He questions the conservative right's perceived hypocrisy on gun rights, pointing out that Prey was disarmed by ICE agents before being shot, despite having a legal right to carry his weapon.

Piers Morgan states, 'Alex Prey was not a domestic terrorist, and he didn't deserve to die.' He highlights video evidence showing ICE officers disarming Prey before he was shot. (01:56, 07:27)

Vincent Oshana argues that Alex Prey was 'on signal' and purposefully interfering with a legal federal duty, blaming local politicians like Governor Tim Waltz, Mayor Fry, and Ilhan Omar for 'pushing people to get in their faces.' He contrasts the situation in Minnesota with Texas, where more deportations occur without similar protests, attributing the Minnesota events to political incitement.

Oshana states, 'Alex, on purposeful on signal. It's all coordinated to get in their faces, peers, and disrupt a legal federal duty.' He adds, 'You know why it's in Minnesota, Piers? Because Tim Walls, Mayor uh Fry, Elon Omar are pushing for people to get in their faces and do this type of stuff.' (06:08, 09:00)

Martin Lamont Hill asserts that the government is 'waging war' not just on undocumented individuals but on citizens, deeming protesters 'enemy of the states' and conducting 'unlawful raids.' He suggests these actions constitute an assault on the Constitution and a potential violation of Minnesota's 10th Amendment rights, arguing that the cruelty of the Trump administration's approach is intentional.

Hill states, 'The government is essentially waging war not just on people who are deemed to be unlawfully here... But you're seeing citizens uh being waged war upon. We're watching protesters being deemed enemy of the states. We're watching unlawful raids at homes and in workplaces. We are seeing an assault on the Constitution.' He later adds, 'In some ways, it seems like the cruelty is the point.' (04:13, 28:22)

Jillian Michaels introduces the 'Dignity Bill' as a bipartisan legislative proposal to address immigration reform. This bill aims to provide strong border enforcement (E-Verify, physical barriers, surveillance) while offering a path to legal status for long-term undocumented residents (after 5 years, paying $7,000 over 7 years, back taxes) and citizenship for children brought in illegally. She emphasizes moving beyond finger-pointing to find practical solutions.

Michaels describes the 'Dignity Bill' as bipartisan, giving Republicans 'strong border enforcement' and allowing those in the country for 5 years to apply for legal status for $7,000 over seven years, with kids getting access to citizenship. (25:22)

Several panelists discuss the political motivations behind immigration policies. Lewis Goodall suggests that ICE's heavy presence in 'blue states' like Minnesota is a 'show of political force' rather than solely about enforcement. Jillian Michaels and Piers Morgan discuss the theory that open borders under Democratic administrations could be intended to shift demographics and electoral maps by increasing the number of potential Democratic voters and influencing apportionment.

Goodall states, 'Why would it be that you would flood ICE agents into a the Twin Cities... than you have local police officers? This isn't just about immigration. This is about the politics of fear against a blue state and against a blue set of cities.' Michaels adds, 'It also games the apportionment map because it doesn't matter if the population in your state is documented legally or not. The more people you have, the more congressmen you get... the more electoral college votes you get.' (37:32, 38:53)