Trump SPIRALS as he LOSES EVERY LAWSUIT trying to TAKEOVER VOTING!!!
YouTube · Z54vsYnkH0k
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖A federal judge issued summary judgment against Trump's executive order to create a 'citizenship list' for mail-in ballots, deeming it an illegal attempt to interfere with elections.
- ❖California Attorney General Rob Bonta confirmed this was the 18th final judgment in 72 cases brought by his office against Trump's administration.
- ❖23 Democratic Attorneys General filed an amicus brief in a Florida case, arguing that a $1.8 billion fund and blanket immunity granted in a settlement involving Todd Blanch were 'highly irregular and breathtakingly improper.'
- ❖The attorneys general view Trump's actions as a deliberate effort to create a 'boogeyman' of voter fraud to justify voter suppression.
- ❖They are actively preparing for potential election day mischief, including military presence at polls, USPS interference, and ballot seizures, with pre-written briefs ready for immediate court action.
Insights
1Federal Court Blocks Trump's 'Citizenship List' for Mail-in Ballots
Judge Talwani issued a summary judgment against an executive order by Donald Trump that sought to create a 'citizenship list' administered by the United States Postal Service and Department of Homeland Security. This list would have acted as a filter to prevent ballots deemed 'inappropriate' from reaching voters or election officials. The court found this order violated the Election Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which designates states and Congress, not the President, to determine the time, place, and manner of elections.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated, 'Judge Talwani... issue[d] a summary judgment, a final judgment... striking down Trump's attempt to interfere with our elections and to create the citizenship list.' He added that the president 'has zero say on the time, place, and manner of how elections occur.'
2Democratic Attorneys General Challenge Alleged Fraud on the Court by DOJ/Todd Blanch
23 Democratic Attorneys General, led by California, filed an amicus brief in a Florida federal court case presided over by Judge Williams. Their brief argued that a settlement involving Todd Blanch (Trump's former private attorney acting on behalf of the federal government) was 'highly irregular and breathtakingly improper.' The settlement created an 'unprecedented $1.8 billion fund' of taxpayer money for 'paramilitary organizations and insurrectionists' and granted 'blanket immunity' for future prosecutions of past misconduct, which the AGs believe violates the rule of law and separation of powers.
Rob Bonta explained, '23 Democratic Attorneys General filed an amicus brief... to tell the court what we thought... to suggest that this does not pass the smell test. This is highly irregular and breathtakingly improper.' He cited the $1.8 billion fund and blanket immunity as key issues.
3DOJ Nominee Todd Blanch Conceded Epstein Act Violations
Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled in 'Fang versus Blanch' that Todd Blanch failed to oppose arguments that he violated the Epstein Transparency Act in at least five different ways. By not addressing these claims, Blanch effectively conceded the violations, adding another significant issue to his upcoming confirmation hearing for Attorney General.
Michael Popok noted, 'Judge Emmet Sullivan... just ruled in Fang versus Blanch that Mr. Blanch failed to oppose any of the arguments that were raised that he violated the Epstein Act... and therefore the court has to conclude that he violated the Epstein Act in at least five different ways.'
Lessons
- Stay informed about state-level legal challenges to election laws, as state attorneys general are actively defending voting rights against perceived federal overreach.
- Recognize that claims of widespread voter fraud are often used to justify voter suppression measures, as argued by Attorney General Bonta, and scrutinize such claims for evidence.
- Support organizations and officials committed to election integrity and the rule of law, as they are actively preparing to counter potential interference on election day.
Quotes
"Donald Trump continues to chase ghosts and chase this this idea, this delusion that there is somehow widespread voter fraud. There's not."
"The president has zero say on the time, place, and manner of how elections occur. And he's he's working overtime to interfere."
"They have weaponized the United States Department of Justice. They've used it as a political tool to go after their political enemies. They are involved in political persecutions, not criminal prosecutions."
"The right to vote is the right from which all of the rights flow. And if that is not protected, if that is not safe, if that is not secure... our democracy is is at real risk."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
SHOCK Ruling on Trump Deportation PLOT + DEBUNKED Election WARRANT?!? | It's Complicated
"The Fifth Circuit Court's controversial ruling redefines 'seeking admission' for non-citizens, potentially allowing indefinite detention for millions, while a federal search warrant for 2020 election ballots is criticized as a 'test run' for future election interference."
Trump DOJ REACHES NEW LOW Trying to SAVE Trump
"Professor Aziz Huck dissects the foundational principles of the rule of law, revealing how modern political partisanship and the Justice Department's 'weaponization fund' challenge core constitutional mechanisms and legal predictability."
LIVE: Lawyers and Fmr. Judges STRIKE BACK as Trump Threatens Courts
"Former federal and state judges, alongside leading lawyers, unite to defend the independent judiciary and the rule of law against unprecedented political attacks and the erosion of public trust."
Major SCOTUS "Birthright Citizenship" Case, and Charlie Kirk Murder Trial Bullet Questions
"Megyn Kelly and legal experts dissect the Supreme Court's oral arguments on birthright citizenship and break down new, potentially exculpatory evidence in the Charlie Kirk murder trial, including an 'inconclusive' bullet match and complex DNA findings."