Piers Morgan Uncensored
Piers Morgan Uncensored
April 17, 2026

"GRIFTERS!" Is Harry & Meghan Australia Tour a Step Too Far? | Plus Josh Duhamel Interview

Quick Read

Piers Morgan and his panel vehemently criticize Harry and Meghan's Australia tour as a 'sham royal tour' and a 'cash cow' operation, arguing it further damages the British monarchy.
Critics accuse Harry and Meghan of being 'grifters' who monetize their royal titles while trashing the monarchy.
The panel argues Harry and Meghan's titles should be stripped, drawing parallels to Prince Andrew's removal.
Apathy among younger generations and the couple's actions are seen as major threats to the monarchy's longevity.

Summary

Piers Morgan and his panel intensely debate Harry and Meghan's recent tour of Australia, framing it as a 'sham royal tour' designed to monetize their royal titles while actively undermining the monarchy. Guests, including Maureen Callahan and Denica Deorgio, label them 'grifters,' citing Meghan's alleged past complaints about not being paid for royal duties and the current lack of public enthusiasm for their events in Australia, including unsold tickets for a 'girls retreat.' The discussion draws parallels to Prince Andrew's title stripping, arguing Harry and Meghan's actions are equally, if not more, damaging to the royal institution. While one panelist, Tessa Dunlop, offers a contrarian view, suggesting the couple's activities bring positive exposure and that the monarchy should be more forgiving, the prevailing sentiment is that their behavior is unacceptable and threatens the monarchy's future, especially given King Charles's health struggles and an upcoming critical US visit. The episode also features an interview with actor Josh Duhamel, who discusses his new film 'Preschool,' the divisive state of America, and his belief that actors should not use their platforms to preach politics.
This episode highlights the ongoing public and media scrutiny of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's post-royal activities, specifically their perceived attempts to leverage their royal status for personal gain while criticizing the institution. It underscores the fragility of the British monarchy's public image amidst internal scandals and generational shifts, and the intense debate around how the institution should manage dissenting former members.

Takeaways

  • Harry and Meghan's Australia tour is widely condemned as a 'sham royal tour' and a 'cash cow' operation.
  • Meghan Markle reportedly expressed disbelief at not being paid for her initial Australia tour and allegedly threw tea at an aide.
  • There's a petition in Australia with 45,000+ signatures demanding no taxpayer money be spent on their security.
  • Meghan's 'girls retreat' in Australia reportedly has unsold tickets for a 300-person venue, with age restrictions for attendees.
  • Piers Morgan and panelists advocate for stripping Harry and Meghan's titles, citing the precedent set with Prince Andrew.
  • The monarchy is described as being 'in the fight of its life' due to the Queen's passing, King Charles's cancer, and the Prince Andrew scandal.
  • Harry and Meghan's actions are seen as damaging the monarchy's reputation, especially before King Charles's critical US state visit.
  • Tessa Dunlop offers a contrarian view, arguing Harry and Meghan's activities bring positive exposure and that the monarchy should be more forgiving.
  • Josh Duhamel believes actors should not use their platforms to preach politics, focusing instead on entertaining their audience.

Insights

1Harry and Meghan's Australia Tour as a 'Cash Cow'

Piers Morgan and his guests assert that Harry and Meghan's visit to Australia is a calculated effort to generate income, leveraging their royal association without official royal duties. Denica Deorgio explicitly calls them 'Mr. and Mrs. Grifter,' using Australia as a 'cash cow' for photo opportunities and PR. Meghan's announced role as a guest judge on 'MasterChef Australia' is cited as evidence of commercial exploitation.

Denica Deorgio states, 'Mr. and Mrs. Grifter peers have come to Australia and are using us as a cash cow essentially' and mentions Meghan's role as a guest judge on 'MasterChef Australia.' Maureen Callahan notes, 'Netflix has dumped them. Spotify and Lemonata have dumped Megan. The coffers have dried up. They are in Australia where I am told reliably by many Australian audience members of the nerve they are not wanted.'

2Call for Stripping Royal Titles Based on Andrew Precedent

Multiple panelists argue that Harry and Meghan's titles should be removed, drawing a direct comparison to Prince Andrew, who had his titles stripped due to his association with Jeffrey Epstein. The argument is that if Andrew's actions dishonored the monarchy, Harry and Meghan's public criticisms and commercial ventures under royal guise are equally, if not more, detrimental.

Piers Morgan states, 'The titles need to be stripped. It needs to happen.' He adds, 'We now have precedent with Andrew, Mount Batton Windsor, who was Prince Andrew... He's had everything stripped. And to date, he's not been convicted of any crime. He certainly hasn't been out there attacking the royal family, attacking the monarchy on a global stage.'

3Monarchy's Vulnerable State and Apathy Threat

The British monarchy is described as facing significant challenges, including the passing of Queen Elizabeth, King Charles's cancer diagnosis, and the Prince Andrew scandal. This vulnerability is exacerbated by Harry and Meghan's actions, which are seen as creating a 'rival royal family' and fostering apathy among younger generations, posing an existential threat to the institution's future.

Piers Morgan notes, 'The British monarchy is in the fight of his life. The late queen, its global figurehead for 70 years, is gone. The monarch is still battling cancer. There's relentless global scrutiny on the institution's historic sins.' Joe Elvin expresses concern that 'young people, my kids aren't that interested... apathy is dangerous for him.'

4Meghan's Perceived 'Tonedeafness' and Commercialization

Meghan Markle is criticized for a perceived lack of understanding regarding her public role and for overtly commercializing her image. Her choice of expensive outfits for charity events, which are then promoted on her online platform, is highlighted as an example of profiting from her royal association.

Denica Deorgio details, 'She's profiting off the clothing she's wearing. She's got a $1,200 dress on. She's got a Christian Dior pumps on. She's got the Cartiier bracelets, the the Tiffany bracelet. She's put it all onto her online AI platform. So, she's going to these women's homeless shelters, wearing these outfits, and profiting of it.' Piers Morgan adds, 'I would say her biggest problem from the start has just been the tonedeafness, just not really getting it.'

Notable Moments

Report of Meghan Markle's initial Australia tour comments and alleged behavior.

This sets the historical context for the panel's current criticism, suggesting a pattern of discontent and entitlement from Meghan regarding royal duties without financial compensation.

Discussion of a petition in Australia against funding Harry and Meghan's security.

This provides concrete evidence of public disapproval and financial concern in Australia regarding the couple's visit, reinforcing the 'cash cow' narrative.

Josh Duhamel's stance on actors and politics.

This offers a refreshing and contrarian perspective within Hollywood, arguing against celebrities using their platform for political preaching, which is a common point of contention in media discussions.

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes