BREAKING: Trump official to be hit with CRIMINAL REFERRAL
YouTube · _2EZBZ9dri8
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Christy Gnome has been criminally referred to the Department of Justice by Senate and House Judiciary Committee members for alleged false statements to Congress.
- ❖Specific allegations include Gnome's unequivocal 'No' when asked if Corey Lewandowski approved DHS contracts, directly contradicted by DHS records and official accounts.
- ❖Lying to Congress falls under 18 USC Section 1001, a five-year criminal offense for making false statements.
- ❖The hosts express strong skepticism that the current DOJ leadership will conduct a fair, impartial investigation due to perceived political allegiances.
- ❖A criminal referral has a five-year statute of limitations, meaning a future administration could still pursue the case.
- ❖The podcast argues that a consistent application of accountability is essential to restore legitimacy to government and prevent future misconduct by officials.
Insights
1Criminal Referral for Christy Gnome's Alleged False Statements to Congress
Members of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees have formally referred Christy Gnome to the Department of Justice for a criminal investigation. The referral centers on allegations that Gnome lied under oath during her congressional testimony.
The referral cites multiple instances of potential perjury. A key example is Gnome's denial to Senator Blumenthal that Corey Lewandowski had a role in approving DHS contracts. This denial is directly contradicted by ProPublica reporting, DHS records, and accounts from current and former DHS officials, which indicate Lewandowski not only had a role but approved a multi-million dollar equipment contract.
2Legal Classification and Penalties for Lying to Congress
While commonly referred to as perjury, lying to Congress under oath is legally classified as making a false statement to Congress. This is a serious federal offense with significant penalties.
The specific federal statute violated is 18 USC Section 1001. This statute carries a potential penalty of up to five years in prison. The hosts emphasize that the evidence against Gnome, as reported, makes this a 'perjury for dummies' or 'false statement for dummies' case, suggesting it would not be difficult to prove.
3Skepticism Regarding Current DOJ Action and Future Prospects
The hosts express low confidence that the current Department of Justice, under its present leadership, will vigorously pursue the criminal referral against Christy Gnome, citing concerns about political bias.
Glenn Kirschner states that options for Gnome's criminal culpability are 'slim to none and slim is fading fast' in the hands of Pam Bondi and Todd Blanch, the number two at DOJ. They suggest that a full, fair, and apolitical investigation is 'extraordinarily unlikely.' However, they note that the five-year statute of limitations means a future, potentially Democratic, administration could still pick up the investigation.
4Accountability as a Foundation for Restoring Government Legitimacy
The hosts argue that a consistent and apolitical application of accountability for high-ranking officials who lie is essential to maintain the rule of law and restore public trust in government institutions.
Kirschner criticizes the historical lack of appetite to hold high government officials accountable for crimes, including lying to Congress, which he attributes to the current state of a 'partially corrupt and compromised Supreme Court' and a 'lawless and unconstitutional war.' He advocates for a process where career law enforcement and prosecutors conduct fair, impartial investigations, presenting evidence to a grand jury and then a trial jury, regardless of the outcome.
Lessons
- Understand that a criminal referral to the DOJ does not guarantee immediate prosecution, especially when political considerations are perceived to influence the department's actions.
- Recognize that federal statutes like 18 USC Section 1001 exist to penalize false statements to Congress, carrying significant criminal penalties.
- Consider the long-term implications of criminal referrals, as they can remain valid for years under the statute of limitations, potentially allowing future administrations to pursue cases.
- Support efforts to promote apolitical investigations and prosecutions for government officials to uphold the rule of law and restore public trust in institutions.
Quotes
"It kind of reads like perjury for dummies because among other allegations, you know, Christine was asked, I believe by Senator Blumenthal whether Corey Luendowski has a role in approving DHS contracts. Christy Gnome answered unequivocally, 'No.' Well, guess what? Investigative reporters found that DHS records, plus accounts given by current and former DHS officials, show that he not only had a role, but records show, quote, Corey Luwendowski approved a multi-million dollar equipment contract at DHS last summer."
"When somebody lies to Congress in a congressional hearing, we don't technically call it perjury, even if the witness is under oath. We call it a false statement to Congress in violation of a federal statute 18USC section 1001. But it is a five-year criminal offense."
"The options for criminal culpability to visit Christy Gnome are probably slim to none and slim is fading fast because in the hands of Pam Bondi and Todd Blanch, the number two at the Department of Justice, I find it extraordinarily unlikely that they will actually conduct a full fair, impartial, and apolitical investigation of this criminal referral."
"For gosh sakes, for once, how about we try accountability?"
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes

Jeanine Pirro suffers ULTIMATE HUMILIATION in court
"Former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, now US Attorney for DC, faced significant embarrassment after a jury delivered a 35-minute 'not guilty' verdict in a felony case involving a homeless man and a cat toy laser pointer."

Jasmine Crockett Detonates. Roland Destroys MAGA Lies. Activists Confront Racist. Best of #RMU
"This episode exposes Republican hypocrisy on white supremacy, systematically debunks MAGA political lies, and highlights a new NAACP initiative leveraging Black athletic power to combat voting rights suppression in Southern states."

Trump DOJ REACHES NEW LOW Trying to SAVE Trump
"Professor Aziz Huck dissects the foundational principles of the rule of law, revealing how modern political partisanship and the Justice Department's 'weaponization fund' challenge core constitutional mechanisms and legal predictability."

LIVE: Lawyers and Fmr. Judges STRIKE BACK as Trump Threatens Courts
"Former federal and state judges, alongside leading lawyers, unite to defend the independent judiciary and the rule of law against unprecedented political attacks and the erosion of public trust."