Red State MAGAs ASHAMED as Trump Craters (w/ Angie "Pumps" Sullivan & Phil Gordon) | Bulwark Podcast
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Many MAGA voters, particularly privileged white women, are insulated from the direct consequences of policies they support, making empathy-based persuasion difficult.
- ❖Financial pain, such as losses in stocks or 401ks, is identified as a potential trigger for some MAGA voters to re-evaluate their political stance.
- ❖Christian nationalism is enabling 'nut jobs' into positions of power, leading to policies driven by religious zealotry rather than sound governance.
- ❖Trump's foreign policy is a 'roller coaster' of extreme, rapid shifts, often driven by short-term political needs rather than coherent strategy.
- ❖The Biden administration's reluctance to re-enter the JCPOA was influenced by political sensitivity and fear of blowback, a caution Phil Gordon now regrets.
- ❖Democrats are advised to be more 'authentic' and 'forceful' in their messaging, emulating Trump's willingness to be 'strong and wrong' and less afraid of making mistakes or offending segments of their base.
- ❖The Democratic Party faces a challenge in foreign policy, being criticized by both left-wing anti-war factions and centrist groups for perceived weakness or lack of clear stance.
Insights
1Privilege Insulates Red-State Women from Abortion Ban Realities
Angie Sullivan argues that many white, upper-middle-class women in abortion-ban states continue to vote for politicians like Trump because their privilege allows them to afford out-of-state medical care if their daughters face a crisis pregnancy. This insulation prevents them from applying the consequences to the 'greater good' and makes them less likely to change their political views based on reproductive rights issues.
Sullivan states, 'when you're white, you're upper middle class, so you have the protection of privilege. And it's very easy to say my privilege insulates me from if my daughter had a pregnancy that had to be terminated for medical reasons, I could afford to take her somewhere else to provide health care for her.'
2Financial Pain as a Catalyst for MAGA Voter Re-evaluation
Sullivan suggests that for some deeply entrenched MAGA voters, particularly those whose views are tied to religion, only significant financial loss (e.g., in stocks, bonds, 401ks) might prompt a re-evaluation of their political allegiance. She observes that 'the cost to humanity and humans and lawbreaking and corruption all of that is fine until it affects my pocketbook.'
Sullivan states, 'I think that the pain would have to be loss of you know stocks, bonds, portfolios, 401k that is where like it it seems the cost to humanity and humans and lawb breaking and corruption all of that is fine until it affects my pocketbook.'
3Trump's 'Roller Coaster' Foreign Policy and Iran
Phil Gordon characterizes Trump's foreign policy, particularly concerning Iran, as a series of extreme and rapid shifts. He notes Trump's oscillation between aggressive threats of escalation (like wiping out power plants) and sudden pivots to 'serious discussions' and de-escalation (like lifting sanctions on Iranian oil). Gordon views the lifting of sanctions as a 'desperate and panicked move' driven by a desire to mitigate rising oil prices caused by his own actions, rather than a coherent strategy.
Gordon describes Trump's actions as 'we're on a roller coaster and the cycles just keep getting faster and faster' and later calls the lifting sanctions on Iranian oil 'a desperate and panic move.'
4Critique of Democratic Foreign Policy Caution and the JCPOA
Gordon expresses regret that the Biden administration did not re-enter the JCPOA, believing they were 'too sensitive to the politics of it and perception.' He argues that the deal, despite its imperfections, effectively curbed Iran's nuclear program and that Trump's withdrawal directly led to the current problem of highly enriched uranium. Gordon suggests that Democrats are often too cautious, fearing political blowback from both internal factions and external critics, which prevents them from taking bold, principled stances.
Gordon states, 'I wish we had [re-entered JCPOA]. I think we could have gotten some extension of it.' He adds, 'I think we were probably too sensitive to the politics of it and perception.'
5Democrats Need 'Strong and Wrong' Authenticity
Both guests agree that Democrats could learn from Trump's 'superpower' of authenticity and willingness to be 'strong and wrong.' Sullivan advocates for politicians to show more 'fight and spirit' and not be afraid to use strong language to defend personal freedoms. Gordon notes Trump's ability to challenge 'received wisdom' in foreign policy without political cost, suggesting Democrats should be more decisive and less worried about criticism from cable news panels or internal party dynamics.
Sullivan says, 'I think we have to have some fight and some spirit and not be afraid to say, "Fuck you."'; Gordon states, 'strong and wrong goes a lot a long way and sort of authentic authenticity goes a long way too.'
Bottom Line
The 'don't ask, don't tell' approach within families regarding political differences is a prevalent coping mechanism in deeply divided communities, allowing relationships to persist by avoiding contentious topics.
This highlights the depth of political polarization, where even familial bonds are maintained through deliberate ignorance of opposing views, rather than through dialogue or reconciliation.
Understanding this dynamic could inform strategies for community-level engagement that focus on shared values or non-political issues, creating pathways for trust before addressing divisive topics, or accepting that some relationships are simply not open to political discourse.
The 'City Elders' group, advocating for biblical mandates in local governance, represents a direct and organized effort to establish Christian nationalism at the municipal level, influencing school boards and city councils.
This indicates a strategic, localized push for religious control over secular institutions, moving beyond national rhetoric to tangible policy changes that impact daily life.
Monitoring and documenting the activities and policy proposals of such groups at the local level can provide early warnings of broader ideological shifts and inform counter-mobilization efforts by secular or pluralistic advocacy groups.
Trump's willingness to negotiate with adversaries (like Iran, Hamas, or the Houthi) and make unilateral decisions, even if contradictory to traditional Republican stances, often comes without significant political cost from his base.
This 'shamelessness' and disregard for conventional political norms allows him a flexibility in foreign policy that traditional politicians lack, enabling rapid pivots and unexpected deals.
Future political leaders could analyze this phenomenon to understand how to build a base that grants similar flexibility, allowing for pragmatic policy shifts without being constrained by rigid ideological expectations or fear of internal party backlash.
Lessons
- When engaging with MAGA individuals, especially family, shift the conversation to empathy-based questions (e.g., 'What would Jesus do about X?') rather than focusing on 'how can you be so stupid?' to potentially find common ground.
- For Democrats, cultivate authenticity and a willingness to be 'strong and wrong' in public discourse. Don't shy away from forceful language or expressing genuine passion, even if it's not 'politically correct' or risks short-term criticism.
- Challenge traditional foreign policy 'received wisdom,' such as unconditional aid to allies or avoiding negotiations with certain adversaries, if it aligns with a more effective and principled approach, even if it incurs political risk.
Notable Moments
Angie Sullivan describes her family's 'don't ask, don't tell' approach to her political podcast, where they willfully ignore her public political commentary.
This illustrates a common coping mechanism within families deeply divided by politics, highlighting how some maintain relationships by compartmentalizing and denying uncomfortable truths, rather than engaging in conflict.
The hosts play a clip of a woman who voted for Trump three times stating, 'Apparently I'm an idiot,' after realizing his failings.
This moment provides a rare, blunt example of a voter admitting error and changing their mind, offering a glimmer of hope for political persuasion, even if it's driven by personal realization of being misled.
Angie Sullivan vehemently criticizes Senator Markwayne Mullin, calling him 'a [expletive]' who is 'not smart' and 'a religious zealot' who carries a box to stand on at podiums.
This provides a highly specific and colorful critique of a prominent Republican figure, illustrating the depth of personal disdain and the perception of incompetence and religious extremism in leadership.
Phil Gordon discusses Trump's 'Greenland framework' where Trump threatened tariffs if Denmark didn't sell Greenland, but backed down when Europeans threatened counter-tariffs and deployed troops.
This serves as a specific example of how allies can successfully use leverage against Trump, demonstrating that standing up to his unilateral demands can be an effective strategy, rather than simply capitulating.
Quotes
"Why are the people surrounding Trump not taking his phone when he starts drinking and he starts texting all this on social media? She was like, 'Oh, he's a known teetotaler.' And I and that just threw me for an absolute loop."
"The cost to humanity and humans and lawbreaking and corruption all of that is fine until it affects my pocketbook."
"When you're white, you're upper middle class, so you have the protection of privilege. And it's very easy to say my privilege insulates me from if my daughter had a pregnancy that had to be terminated for medical reasons, I could afford to take her somewhere else."
"Markwayne Mullin was picked because he is a [expletive]. He is not smart. His grammar is horrible. And the reason they chose him is that he will do whatever they tell him because he is a not smart and b not interested in doing anything than plastering his lips to Donald Trump's ass."
"We're on a roller coaster and the cycles just keep getting faster and faster... one minute we're threatening to wipe out their power plants... and the next he's talking about serious discussions about a total and complete resolution to the conflict."
"Trump's no pun intended virtually any other goal. I wouldn't minimize, you know, geopolitical concerns. there was a war going on the most it was really important to end it. Obviously the Biden policy didn't work."
"Strong and wrong goes a lot a long way and sort of authentic authenticity goes a long way too like this is my view and you know I respect you if you have a different view."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes

They’re talking about 1 to 2 years in Iran
"David Pakman dissects the escalating Iran conflict, the controversial White House ballroom project, and internal political fractures, arguing that Trump's erratic leadership and self-interest are driving concerning national and international developments."

SHOCK BREAKING: TRUMP PRESSER JUST MADE ME NEARLY THROW UP!
"The host details a "nauseating" Trump cabinet meeting, dissecting his rambling, his cabinet's "pampering," and his questionable statements on war and policy, alongside a progressive Christian politician's impactful response to a death threat."

Cory Booker GOES OFF on Trump and Democrats’ Tax Plan
"Senator Cory Booker delivers a passionate critique of Trump's administration and Congressional inaction, while advocating for bold Democratic policies, including a controversial tax plan that would eliminate federal income tax for most Americans."

Trump’s Weakness EXPOSED After Epic Losing Week for Republicans
"This episode dissects a tumultuous week for Republicans, highlighting Donald Trump's political vulnerabilities through the lens of Christine Gnome's firing, the incoherent Iran war strategy, and shifting dynamics in key primary races."