Tyler Robinson's lover's location revealed -- family speaks out -- Charlie Kirk murder latest

Lance Twigs, identified as Tyler Robinson's roommate and romantic partner, was initially cooperating with authorities and believed to be under FBI protection. However, the host confirmed that Twigs no longer has FBI protection, has retained a lawyer, and has moved out of Utah. His family, while concerned about the gaming culture he shared with Robinson, is '100%' confident police have the right suspect in Tyler Robinson.

The host's exclusive interview with a Lance Twigs family member, who stated, 'He's he's with his family' and confirmed he is 'no longer in Utah'. The family member also stated, '100%' when asked if police have the right guy.

Contrary to public perception, the rooftop from which Charlie Kirk was shot was not a restricted area but easily accessible via public walkways designed for student movement between classes. The host demonstrated the path, showing how a small gate was the only barrier before the shooting, which has since been reinforced.

The host's on-site demonstration, walking up stairs and across public walkways that are 'level with the roof,' noting, 'This was all just was all just open.' A student also confirmed, 'We can't believe people are even wondering about this because it was so easy.'

Tyler Robinson's defense team filed a motion to disqualify the entire prosecution team because one prosecutor's child was within 85 feet of Charlie Kirk during the shooting, making them a potential victim. The defense argues this creates a bias, particularly regarding the decision to seek the death penalty.

The host details the defense's argument that the prosecutor's child was 'within 80 ft of Charlie Kirk being shot' and 'technically a victim here,' creating a conflict that could prevent unbiased prosecution.

The prosecution filed a brief arguing against disqualification, claiming the prosecutor's child did not have a significant emotional reaction, did not witness the shooting directly, and their testimony would be cumulative. They also assert that the decision to seek the death penalty was not influenced by any individual's attendance.

The host reads from the prosecution's filing, which states the child's 'comparatively minor emotional reaction could not have had a greater' impact and that the child 'did not see Charlie Kirk actually get shot' or 'see his wound.'

Defense attorney Clayton Sims explains that a prosecutor's personal connection to a victim, even a potential one, creates a clear conflict of interest. This conflict could lead to a more 'zealous' prosecution, including a greater likelihood of seeking the death penalty. He warns that if the judge fails to disqualify the conflicted team and an appeals court later finds a conflict, the entire case could be overturned, forcing a re-trial from 'square one' and causing significant delays.

Clayton Sims states, 'If you have a personal connection, your kid is a victim in the case, you cannot be the prosecutor in that particular case.' He adds, 'You would be more zealous in your prosecution. You'd be more likely to seek a death penalty if you think that hey my friends kid could have died.'