Republicans get BAD NEWS amid Justice Department announcement

The guest, Congressman Moskowitz, asserts that the Republican-led subcommittee investigating January 6 aims to "rewrite history" by portraying the event as a "regular day" of peaceful protest, despite evidence like the pipe bomber being a Trump voter. He highlights the Republicans' failure to honor law enforcement officers who died as a result of the attack.

The hearing that I'm about to go to... is to investigate January 6 and the origins of January 6th and and try to rewrite history that January 6th didn't happen. It was a regular day at the capital... We're going to remind everyone that a year and a half later, they still haven't hung up the plaque... in memory to the law enforcement officers that died that day.

While the idea of engaging with Greenland and Denmark has a serious policy dimension (preventing Russia or China from establishing bases), the former President's approach (e.g., suggesting buying Greenland) is described as "batshit crazy" execution. The guest notes that the President often has good ideas (like getting NATO countries to pay more) but undermines them with extreme rhetoric or actions.

There is a serious policy here in that we don't want Russia or China to be setting up bases of operation to be in the waters around Greenland... Sometimes the president has a good idea. His execution is just batshit crazy.

The guest explains that the President faces fewer checks and balances in foreign policy compared to domestic policy (where Congress, Supreme Court, states, etc., provide constraints). This allows the President to act more unilaterally, even if it contradicts a party leaning towards isolationism.

In foreign policy the president is king... I think what you're seeing is the president realizing that he that he doesn't have a lot of obstructions in his way. He can do what he wants foreign policy-wise.

Congressman Moskowitz characterizes the Republican party as having no consistent policy convictions, with its agenda entirely dictated by Donald Trump's latest statements. This leads to a lack of traditional conservative concerns, such as budget responsibility, when Trump's directives contradict them.

You're dealing with the Republican party, which is a party of personality... whatever Donald Trump said this morning, this afternoon, this evening, and at 3:00 in the morning, those are the policies of the day of the Republican party. So they don't know what they're stand for or which way the wind blows until they hear hear from Donald Trump.

Attempts to coerce the Federal Reserve, such as dangling criminal prosecution against Jerome Powell, are seen as disastrous for monetary policy and US credibility. The guest cites warnings from Treasury Secretaries, bondholders, Jamie Dimon, and international monetary leaders, emphasizing that such actions risk de-dollarization and could lead to a depression if global confidence in US bonds erodes.

This would be disastrous for monetary policy... We heard from Jamie Diamond... this actually would raise interest rates... We heard from a dozen nations and their monetary leaders... this would undermine our credibility... Our dollar is dropping ddollarization is something that the Russians and the Chinese are working on... if people stop buying our bonds, we can't continue to spend money and we go into to a depression.

Dan Bongino is criticized for building his brand on advocating for the release of Epstein files but then abandoning that cause and leaving his government position once the files reportedly implicated Donald Trump. The guest frames this as a clear example of political opportunism over genuine commitment to transparency.

This is a guy who got his job on the Epstein files... and then as soon as he got there and read that Trump's name is in it hundreds of times, and he's on the flight logs, all of a sudden, Dan Bongo felt like, 'Oh, I'm in an office with four walls and I'm uncomfortable. Let me go back to my podcast.'