Trump BACKS DOWN On Iran Bombing Ultimatum! Bongino CAUGHT LYING About Joe Kent! w/ Elaine Culotti

Quick Read

This episode exposes alleged rigging in California's gubernatorial debate, claims the US is losing a 'hot war' with Iran due to Israeli influence, and highlights Dan Bongino's 'meltdown' over Joe Kent's claims regarding Charlie Kirk's assassination investigation.
California's gubernatorial debate is allegedly rigged to exclude independent and minority candidates.
The US is reportedly losing a 'hot war' with Iran, paradoxically strengthening adversaries by lifting oil sanctions.
Dan Bongino's 'meltdown' over Joe Kent's claims about Charlie Kirk's assassination is framed as deflection due to pro-Israel loyalty.

Summary

The episode features Elaine Culotti, an independent candidate for California governor, who details how the USC-hosted gubernatorial debate is allegedly rigged to exclude independent and minority candidates, favoring those with ties to Silicon Valley billionaires. Culotti proposes a 'Great American Credit Union' as a solution to California's financial woes. The discussion then shifts to the US-Iran conflict, with the host and guest arguing that Iran is not losing the war, that Israel's 'Samson Option' poses a nuclear threat, and that US policy is paradoxically strengthening Russia and Iran by lifting oil sanctions. Finally, the host dissects Dan Bongino's angry denial of Joe Kent's claims about Charlie Kirk's assassination investigation, attributing Bongino's reaction to his strong pro-Israel stance.
The episode claims to expose systemic corruption in California's political landscape, where debates are allegedly manipulated to control voter choice and exclude diverse voices. It also paints a dire picture of US foreign policy in the Middle East, suggesting that the US is being manipulated into a losing war with Iran, potentially leading to global economic collapse or nuclear conflict. The segment on Dan Bongino highlights alleged media deflection and the influence of pro-Israel lobbying on political discourse, raising questions about journalistic integrity and accountability.

Takeaways

  • Elaine Culotti, an independent candidate for California governor, claims the USC-hosted debate excludes candidates of color and independents, favoring San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan due to his Silicon Valley ties and adjusted polling criteria.
  • Culotti highlights that 31-41% of California voters are independent or undecided, necessitating a 'three-podium race' in debates.
  • California's budget shortfall is exacerbated by billionaires leaving the state due to proposed wealth taxes; Culotti proposes a 'Great American Credit Union' where billionaires invest in infrastructure and receive dividends.
  • Governor Newsom vetoed a bill to track $24 billion in homelessness spending, which had passed unanimously in the legislature, raising transparency concerns.
  • Colonel McGregor (via clip) suggests Putin has threatened Israel with nuclear retaliation if Israel uses a nuclear weapon against Iran or any Middle Eastern country.
  • The host argues that Iran has the power to devastate Gulf States' oil and desalinization plants, forcing a US retreat or causing global economic depression and mass casualties.
  • Israel's 'Samson Option' is described as a real policy to launch massive nuclear retaliation if the nation faces destruction, with Israel reportedly possessing around 90 warheads and material for up to 200 more.
  • Scott Bessant (via clip) reveals the US is lifting sanctions on Russian and potentially Iranian oil as an 'emergency move' to counter Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which the host frames as strengthening adversaries during wartime.
  • Iran is reportedly selling more oil than before the war and charging favored countries millions per tanker for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Dan Bongino is accused of lying and deflecting about Joe Kent's claims that Charlie Kirk was against the Iran war and that an investigation into Kirk's assassination was blocked due to potential foreign (e.g., Israeli) involvement.
  • Charlie Kirk's past tweets and statements are presented as evidence that he actively opposed US regime change in Iran and advocated against US involvement in Israel's war.

Bottom Line

The 'jungle primary' system in California, combined with alleged debate rigging, could lead to two Republicans facing off in the general election despite a Democratic majority in the state, effectively disenfranchising Democratic voters.

So What?

This highlights a potential vulnerability in primary systems that can be exploited to manipulate electoral outcomes, leading to governance misaligned with the electorate's overall preference.

Impact

Advocacy for more inclusive debate criteria and reforms to primary systems could ensure broader representation and prevent strategic exclusions that distort democratic processes.

The US strategy of lifting sanctions on Russian and Iranian oil to counter Iran's actions in the Strait of Hormuz is framed as a self-defeating measure that financially strengthens adversaries during active conflicts.

So What?

This suggests a fundamental flaw in US foreign policy, where short-term tactical responses (stabilizing oil prices) may undermine long-term strategic goals (weakening adversaries), potentially prolonging conflicts and increasing global instability.

Impact

Re-evaluating the effectiveness of sanctions and developing more coherent, integrated foreign policy strategies that avoid inadvertently empowering rivals could lead to more effective conflict resolution and national security outcomes.

Opportunities

California's Great American Credit Union

A state-run credit union where Californians and billionaires invest, funding infrastructure projects and small business loans. Billionaires would back losses, and the credit union would earn a 'vig' (percentage) on deals, ensuring returns for investors while providing transparent funding for the state, bypassing Sacramento's alleged 'black hole' of unaccountable spending.

Source: Elaine Culotti

Lessons

  • Critically evaluate the selection criteria for political debates, especially in 'jungle primary' states like California, to identify potential biases that exclude independent or minority candidates.
  • Investigate local and state government spending, particularly on large-scale projects like homelessness initiatives, and advocate for transparency bills to ensure accountability for taxpayer money.
  • Question mainstream media narratives regarding international conflicts, particularly those involving US military intervention, by cross-referencing information from diverse sources and considering alternative perspectives on who is 'winning' or 'losing'.

Notable Moments

Elaine Culotti details the alleged rigging of the California gubernatorial debate by USC, citing criteria changes and conflicts of interest to favor specific candidates.

This moment exposes potential manipulation within the political process, where powerful institutions and wealthy donors can influence who gets a platform in critical elections, undermining democratic fairness.

The host and guest discuss Israel's 'Samson Option' and the potential for nuclear escalation in the Middle East, with Colonel McGregor suggesting Putin has already issued nuclear threats to Israel.

This highlights the extreme risks of the ongoing conflicts, suggesting that religious zealotry and strategic miscalculations could lead to a global catastrophe, challenging the perception of regional conflicts as contained.

The host analyzes Scott Bessant's statements about lifting sanctions on Russian and Iranian oil, framing it as an 'emergency move' that paradoxically strengthens US adversaries during wartime.

This moment critiques US foreign policy, suggesting that actions intended to mitigate short-term economic impacts (like oil prices) are strategically detrimental, revealing a perceived incompetence or ulterior motive in handling international relations.

The host dissects Dan Bongino's angry response to Joe Kent's claims about Charlie Kirk's assassination investigation, presenting evidence that Kirk was indeed against the Iran war and attributing Bongino's reaction to his pro-Israel loyalties.

This moment questions the integrity of prominent media figures and the influence of specific political loyalties on their reporting, suggesting a pattern of deflection when inconvenient truths emerge about foreign policy and political assassinations.

Quotes

"

"If you use a nuclear weapon against Iran or anyone in the Middle East, we will use a nuclear weapon against you. I'd be very surprised if he has not already said that."

Colonel McGregor (via clip)
"

"Iran has the power to make the United States retreat from this war."

Jimmy Dore
"

"The Samson option is a term describing Israel's alleged deterrent strategy of using massive nuclear retaliation as a last resort if its military is defeated or the nation is on the verge of destruction."

Kurt Metzger (reading definition)
"

"Going to war against Iran and the outcome three weeks into it is they remove sanctions on Iranian oil."

Arnold Bertron (via comment)
"

"I was in the White House all day fighting for America. Same tomorrow."

Charlie Kirk (via text message)
"

"What cause is dear to your heart? Cause is dear to my Israel."

Dan Bongino (via clip)

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

Trump And Hegseth BUSTED For Iran War LIES!! Tucker Carlson & Joe Kent SLAM Israel’s Aggression
The Young TurksApr 10, 2026

Trump And Hegseth BUSTED For Iran War LIES!! Tucker Carlson & Joe Kent SLAM Israel’s Aggression

"The Young Turks expose alleged lies from the Trump administration and Pete Hegseth about the Iran war, criticize Israel's role in escalating conflicts, and highlight widespread political corruption, while Melania Trump addresses Epstein ties and Trump attacks his conservative critics."

US Foreign PolicyMiddle East ConflictIsrael-Palestine Conflict+2
Palestinian Evangelical Analyst REACTS To U.S-Israeli War In Iran!
The Young TurksMar 3, 2026

Palestinian Evangelical Analyst REACTS To U.S-Israeli War In Iran!

"The Young Turks dissect the US-Israeli war in Iran, alleging it's driven by Israeli expansionist goals, fueled by US political and media subservience, and resulting in devastating civilian casualties and economic fallout, while a Palestinian Christian analyst details the brutal realities of Israeli occupation and humiliation."

US Foreign PolicyIsrael-Iran ConflictMedia Bias+2
A Whistleblower Running For Congress?!
The Young TurksFeb 14, 2026

A Whistleblower Running For Congress?!

"The Young Turks expose alleged government and media complicity in covering up critical information, from the push for war with Iran and DHS surveillance of activists to shocking revelations from the Epstein files and the suppression of dissent against Israeli influence."

US Foreign PolicyIran WarDHS Surveillance+2
Alex Krainer: This Military Comeback Changes Everything
Interviews 02Jan 23, 2026

Alex Krainer: This Military Comeback Changes Everything

"Alex Krainer argues that the Trump administration is systematically dismantling the post-World War II global order, creating a chaotic but potentially multipolar world, while navigating complex geopolitical pressures from factions within the US, UK, and Israel."

GeopoliticsUS Foreign PolicyIran Sanctions+2