The Don Lemon Show
The Don Lemon Show
March 19, 2026

HOT TOPICS | Donald Trump, Tulsi Gabbard & Pete Hegseth: They're All LIARS!

Quick Read

Don Lemon dissects testimonies from Tulsi Gabbard and Joe Kent, alleging the Trump administration fabricated an 'imminent threat' from Iran and is using the war as a distraction from the Epstein files, while also accusing the FBI of political retaliation.
Tulsi Gabbard's testimony, under oath, reportedly undermined Trump's 'imminent threat' claims about Iran.
Former counterterrorism director Joe Kent resigned, alleging the Iran war was manipulated by Israel and its lobby.
The host claims the Iran war serves as a 'distraction' from damning revelations in the Epstein files concerning Donald Trump.

Summary

Don Lemon critiques the Trump administration's foreign policy and alleged deceptions, focusing on testimonies from Tulsi Gabbard and former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent. Lemon asserts that Gabbard's congressional testimony inadvertently exposed the administration's claims about an 'imminent threat' from Iran as false, highlighting Iran's standing fatwa against nuclear weapons. He further emphasizes Kent's resignation, where Kent explicitly stated Iran posed no imminent threat and accused Israel and its lobby of manipulating intelligence to push for war. Lemon also discusses the FBI's subsequent investigation into Kent for alleged leaks, framing it as political retaliation. The host connects the administration's actions to a 'distraction war' aimed at diverting attention from the Epstein files, citing Congressman Dan Goldman's detailed allegations against Donald Trump regarding sexual assault and a government cover-up.
This episode matters because it challenges official narratives surrounding critical foreign policy decisions and government transparency. It alleges that the Trump administration initiated a war based on false pretenses and is actively suppressing information, including details from the Epstein files, through political maneuvering and alleged cover-ups. The discussion highlights the erosion of public trust in government and intelligence agencies, questioning the motivations behind military actions and the accountability of high-ranking officials.

Takeaways

  • Tulsi Gabbard's congressional testimony, while under oath, reportedly failed to support the Trump administration's claims of an 'imminent threat' from Iran, instead 'giving away the game' by confirming Iran's long-standing fatwa against nuclear weapons.
  • Joe Kent, former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center and Tulsi Gabbard's top aide, resigned in protest, stating Iran posed no imminent threat and that the war was initiated to 'appease Israel' and its powerful lobby.
  • Don Lemon suggests the FBI's investigation into Joe Kent for alleged classified information leaks is a retaliatory measure for breaking ranks and exposing the administration's war narrative.
  • Congressman Dan Goldman's testimony details alleged credible accusations of sexual assault against Donald Trump in the Epstein files, with claims of a government cover-up by Attorney General Pam Bondi.
  • The host posits that the Iran war is a 'distraction war' orchestrated by Donald Trump to divert public attention from the damaging information contained within the Epstein files.
  • Don Lemon criticizes the notion that only the President can determine an 'imminent threat,' arguing it undermines the role and expertise of intelligence agencies like the DNI and CIA.

Insights

1Tulsi Gabbard's Testimony Undermines 'Imminent Threat' Narrative

Don Lemon asserts that Tulsi Gabbard, in her congressional testimony, effectively called Donald Trump a liar without explicitly saying so. She confirmed that there was no 'imminent threat' from Iran, contradicting the administration's justification for military action. Her responses, particularly regarding Iran's fatwa against nuclear weapons, exposed inconsistencies in the official stance.

Gabbard's responses to strategic questioning by Congressman Jason Crowe, confirming the intelligence community's assessment that Iran's fatwa against nuclear weapons was still in place and that the status of the new leader's position on nuclear weapons was 'unknown at this time,' leading to the assessment that they were 'less certain of the positions of Iranian leadership and their intentions than we were 60 days ago.'

2Joe Kent's Resignation and Allegations of Israeli Manipulation

Joe Kent, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, resigned in protest, claiming the war in Iran was launched 'to appease Israel.' He stated that Iran posed no imminent threat and accused the pro-war lobby and Israel of manipulating intelligence to push the U.S. into conflict. Lemon highlights Kent's credibility as a high-ranking official with top security clearance.

Kent's resignation statement: 'I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation. And it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.'

3FBI Investigation into Kent Framed as Retaliation

Following Joe Kent's public statements and resignation, an FBI investigation into him for allegedly leaking classified information was announced. Don Lemon and guest Sager (from Breaking Points) frame this investigation as a predictable act of retaliation by the government to 'destroy this man' for breaking ranks and exposing inconvenient truths, rather than a legitimate inquiry.

Sager's prediction: 'They are going to try and destroy this man. I guarantee you they will try to indict him.' Followed by news of Kent being 'under FBI investigation for allegedly leaking classified information' which 'predates his departure.' Lemon questions the FBI's credibility under Cash Patel.

4Iran War as 'Epstein Distraction War'

Don Lemon posits that Donald Trump is using the war in Iran as a 'distraction war' to deflect attention from the damaging revelations contained within the Epstein files. He argues that Trump has 'Epstein derangement syndrome' and is initiating conflict to save himself from the fallout of these files.

Lemon states: 'Donald Trump has Epstein derangement syndrome. And so he has to distract and deflect from what's what is in those files.'

5Dan Goldman's Allegations of Trump's Involvement in Epstein Crimes and Cover-up

Congressman Dan Goldman presented detailed allegations from the Epstein files, including a victim's credible accusation that Donald Trump sexually assaulted her when she was between 13 and 15. Goldman also highlighted Trump's contradictory statements about Epstein and alleged a government cover-up by Attorney General Pam Bondi, who falsely testified that there was no evidence of Trump committing a crime.

Goldman's speech: 'There is credible evidence that Donald Trump committed a crime... She credibly accuses Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was between 13 and 15... Attorney General Bondi lied when she stated under oath that there is no evidence that Donald Trump committed a crime.'

6Discrepancy in U.S. and Israeli War Goals

Congressman Castro's questioning of Tulsi Gabbard revealed that the stated objectives of the U.S. president for the Iran conflict differ from those of the Israeli government. Israel's focus is on 'disabling the Iranian leadership,' while the U.S. objectives include destroying Iran's ballistic missile capabilities and navy. This suggests a lack of alignment or independent actions by Israel.

Gabbard states: 'The objectives that have been laid out by the president are different from the objectives that have been laid out by the Israeli government.' She details the differences: Israel focused on 'disabling the Iranian leadership' and 'taking out several members,' while the President's objectives are to 'destroy Iran's ballistic missile... capability... and their navy.'

Bottom Line

The host suggests that the government's tactic of initiating FBI investigations against whistleblowers or those who break ranks, even if the allegations predate their public dissent, is a deliberate strategy to discredit and silence opposition, regardless of the individual's past loyalty or 'bonafides.'

So What?

This implies a systemic abuse of power where legal processes are weaponized to maintain political control and suppress dissenting narratives, making it difficult for the public to discern truth from politically motivated attacks.

Impact

This pattern could be tracked across administrations to identify consistent methods of silencing dissent, potentially leading to reforms in whistleblower protection or oversight of federal investigative bodies during politically sensitive periods.

Don Lemon highlights that the administration's strategy of providing nebulous or conflicting information on critical issues like the Iran war keeps the public 'not sure what to believe,' which 'buys the administration time' and prevents unified opposition.

So What?

This suggests a deliberate tactic of information control, where ambiguity is leveraged as a political tool to delay accountability and maintain flexibility in policy, even at the expense of public clarity and trust.

Impact

Investigative journalism could focus on identifying and analyzing instances of 'nebulous' or 'conflicting' information from government sources, tracing their impact on public opinion and policy outcomes to expose potential strategic obfuscation.

Lessons

  • Scrutinize official government narratives, especially concerning foreign policy and military actions, by seeking out diverse sources and cross-referencing information from intelligence officials and whistleblowers.
  • Demand accountability from elected and appointed officials regarding their justifications for war and their handling of sensitive information, particularly when testimonies under oath contradict public statements.
  • Support organizations and media outlets that commit to independent journalism and investigate potential government cover-ups, such as those related to the Epstein files, to ensure transparency and hold powerful figures responsible.

Notable Moments

Don Lemon's opening monologue where he expresses being in a 'great mood' because 'MAGA is falling apart,' framing current political turmoil as 'short-term pain for long-term gain' for the country.

This sets the highly opinionated and critical tone of the episode, immediately establishing the host's political stance and framing the subsequent analysis of events through a lens of anticipated positive outcomes from the current administration's perceived failures.

The host playing a clip of a woman who voted for Trump three times, now calling him a 'worthless pile of [expletive]' and admitting, 'Apparently, I'm an idiot.'

This serves as a powerful anecdotal conclusion to the episode, aiming to resonate with listeners who may be questioning their past political allegiances and reinforcing the host's narrative about the administration's failures and the public's growing disillusionment.

Quotes

"

"Tulsi Gabbard gave away the game yesterday. She gave it away. Like just gave it away. She she called Donald Trump a liar without saying the president is lying. She just basically did it."

Don Lemon
"

"I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation. And it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby."

Joe Kent
"

"They are going to try and destroy this man. I guarantee you they will try to indict him. They're going to say he breached his uh they're going to say he breached his security clearance by sharing information."

Sager (from Breaking Points)
"

"Donald Trump has Epstein derangement syndrome. And so he has to distract and deflect from what's what is in those files."

Don Lemon
"

"She credibly accuses Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her when she was between 13 and 15."

Congressman Dan Goldman
"

"The objectives that have been laid out by the president are different from the objectives that have been laid out by the Israeli government."

Tulsi Gabbard

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

LIVE: Ben Meiselas RESPONDS to BREAKING NEWS!! 2/24/2026
Legal AF PodcastFeb 24, 2026

LIVE: Ben Meiselas RESPONDS to BREAKING NEWS!! 2/24/2026

"The Midas Touch Network boycotts the official State of the Union, hosting an alternative event while exposing alleged financial grifts, DOJ cover-ups of Epstein files, and the Pentagon's push for unregulated AI mass surveillance."

Political CommentaryState of the UnionDonald Trump+2
A Whistleblower Running For Congress?!
The Young TurksFeb 14, 2026

A Whistleblower Running For Congress?!

"The Young Turks expose alleged government and media complicity in covering up critical information, from the push for war with Iran and DHS surveillance of activists to shocking revelations from the Epstein files and the suppression of dissent against Israeli influence."

US Foreign PolicyIran WarDHS Surveillance+2
PBS News Hour full episode, April 10, 2026
PBS NewsHourApr 10, 2026

PBS News Hour full episode, April 10, 2026

"This episode covers high-stakes US-Iran peace talks amidst ongoing conflict, Hungary's pivotal election challenging Viktor Orban, the accelerating decline in US birth rates, AI's disruptive impact on jobs, and Palestinian Christians observing Easter under Israeli restrictions."

US-Iran relationsInternational diplomacyHungarian politics+2
MAGA Stooge Freezes After My Question on CNN
The Adam Mockler ShowApr 3, 2026

MAGA Stooge Freezes After My Question on CNN

"Adam Mockler dissects the Trump administration's claims of 'total victory' in foreign conflicts and its alleged attempts to politicize the Department of Justice, arguing these actions undermine democratic institutions and moral leadership."

US PoliticsForeign PolicyDepartment of Justice+2