Black Liberals Demand BOYCOTTING Democrats Over Latinos REFUSING To Support Jasmine Crockett!

The host claims that Cuban and other Latino communities, particularly in Miami, are susceptible to misinformation. They argue that the Republican party effectively uses terms like 'socialism' and 'communism' to describe Democratic policies, which resonates strongly with Cubans due to their historical experiences, leading them to consistently vote Republican.

The host states, 'Cubans hear socialism, communism, and as long as the Republicans use those words to describe Democratic policies, they will vote Republican every time.'

The host and a guest contend that Jasmine Crockett's political strategy, heavily reliant on 'race card' rhetoric and 'divisive race politics,' was her downfall in the Texas Senate primary. They argue that this approach, while gaining popularity on social media, did not translate into broad electoral support, especially among Latino voters.

The host asserts, 'Jasmine Crockett can only blame herself for not winning. When you played a race card over and over and over, it may work for some time... it's not going to work anymore.' A guest adds, 'Jasmine Crockett did it to herself, right? Her divisive race politics. Uh that was her downfall.'

Following Crockett's loss and the perceived lack of Latino support, some black liberals and the guest argue that the idea of a unified 'black and brown coalition' is false. They claim that Latinos are not true allies and that black people should abandon the concept of minority unity, as other groups will act in their own perceived self-interest.

A guest states, 'James Terico winning over Jasmine Crockett is a good and valid reason why we should stop saying black and brown. We not brothers and sisters, okay? They're they're not our true allies. Black people, we don't have any true allies.'

A guest specifically highlights Jasmine Crockett's past comment, 'We done picking cotton. You can't pay us enough to go find a plantation,' as a key reason for her alienation of Latino voters. The guest interprets this as implying that picking cotton (or similar labor) is a job for Hispanics/Latinos, which is seen as racist and out of touch with the upward mobility of many Latino families.

A guest quotes Crockett: 'We done picking cotton. You can't pay us enough to go find a plantation.' The guest then states, 'That's why you lost cuz you're racist.' The host agrees, 'It does kind of imply that, yeah, that's a job for the for the Hispanics, right?'

The guest explains that many Latino voters in Texas, particularly those living along the southern border, are deeply affected by issues like poverty and the strain on resources caused by increased migration. They are not interested in 'blue policies that put their parents in fields' and are instead focused on economic advancement and border security, leading them to vote for candidates like Trump.

The guest states, 'the majority of the Latino voters for Trump here in Texas live in the southern border... When you import a bunch of riffraff from third world countries and they end up in those southern border towns, they strain the resources for those people.'

The host introduces a distinction between 'cultural Marxists' and 'regular Marxists.' They explain that cultural Marxists prioritize identity politics (non-whites vs. whites) over economic class struggle (rich vs. poor). In this framework, cultural Marxists expect all non-white groups to unite against white candidates, even if those white candidates are progressive, leading to feelings of betrayal when this doesn't occur.

The host says, 'cultural Marxists are well, it's non-whites versus the whites. And no matter what, all non-whites are supposed to stick together against the whites.' They add, 'If it's between a black Marxist and a white Marxist, you got to go with a black Marxist.'