Soldier Claims AR-15 Accidentally Killed His Wife
YouTube · fafvXHXlQ5s
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Skyler Nemits admitted to shooting his wife, Danielle Ripion, with an AR-15, claiming it was an accident.
- ❖Danielle Ripion married Nemits after only three months, dropping out of high school, and showed signs of a controlling relationship, including concealed bruises and restricted independence.
- ❖Nemits, a soldier, stated he was clearing the AR-15, which he believed was unloaded, when it accidentally discharged, hitting Danielle in the back of the head.
- ❖Detectives noted Nemits's story changed regarding the firearm's location and his activities upon returning home.
- ❖Nemits's oversharing of unrelated details and preemptive self-praise (e.g., not beating dogs, criticizing others for cheating) were identified by the narrator as potential indicators of deception.
- ❖Nemits claimed he had cleared AR-style rifles thousands of times and understood firearm safety protocols, making his 'mistake' highly improbable.
- ❖Detectives informed Nemits that a search warrant for the premises, including the computer, would reveal any evidence of infidelity or motive, urging him to be truthful.
Insights
1Inconsistent Account of the Shooting Incident
Skyler Nemits provided conflicting details about the AR-15's location and how it came to be in the computer room. Initially, he stated he left it unloaded in the closet, then claimed his wife brought it to the computer room 30 minutes before the shooting, asking him to put it away. This shifting narrative raised immediate suspicion from the detectives.
Nemits initially stated he left the AR-15 unloaded in the closet with the magazine separate (). Later, he claimed Danielle brought the rifle into the computer room 30 minutes before the incident, asking him to put it away (, , ).
2Discrepancy Between Firearms Expertise and Claimed Accident
Nemits, a soldier with extensive experience handling firearms since age 4 and clearing M4s in the military thousands of times, claimed the AR-15 accidentally discharged. He stated he put the weapon on 'fire' before clearing it, a procedure contrary to standard army training which dictates clearing on 'safe.' Detectives found this highly improbable given his expertise.
Nemits stated he has been shooting since age 4 and clearing M4s in the military since late 2012, estimating he's cleared rifles 'a couple thousand' times (, ). He admitted standard army procedure is to clear a weapon on 'safe,' not 'fire' ().
3Signs of a Controlling and Potentially Abusive Relationship
Danielle Ripion's friends observed her wearing clothing that concealed her body and occasionally saw finger-shaped bruises. Nemits reportedly destroyed her phone in a rage and subjected her to a rigid cleaning schedule, even requiring his approval for her to take a job. This background suggests a pattern of control and potential domestic violence.
Friends noticed Danielle wore concealing clothing and had occasional finger-shaped bruises (). Nemits destroyed her phone in a rage (). Danielle was on a rigid cleaning schedule and needed his approval for a job ().
4Behavioral Cues of Deception During Interrogation
The narrator and detectives noted Nemits's tendency to overshare irrelevant details and interject statements designed to portray him as a 'good person' (e.g., not beating dogs, criticizing others for cheating). These behaviors are often observed in suspects attempting to deflect suspicion or avoid direct answers.
Nemits began with 'fake crying' but quickly spoke calmly (). He unprompted stated he never beat his dogs () and criticized a squad leader for cheating on his wife (), which the narrator identified as oversharing and an attempt to appear innocent (, ).
5Questionable Circumstances of the 'Accident'
Nemits claimed he was standing approximately 5 feet behind Danielle, who was seated at a computer, when the rifle discharged. He also stated he had just returned from a three-week deployment, and his wife immediately went to work on her computer after their reunion, which detectives found unusual given their separation.
Nemits described being 'directly behind her' at about 5 feet away when the rifle went off (, ). He stated that after a 3-week separation, his wife went to work on her computer while he watched TV (, ).
6Bullet Trajectory Contradicts Nemits's Story
Detectives state the bullet entrance and exit wounds, and the trajectory, do not align with Nemits's initial account of the weapon's position.
The trajectory of that round doesn't match up from the entrance to exit wound doesn't add up to what you told us.
7Shifting Account of Weapon Position
Nemits's description of where the AR-15 was held changes multiple times during the interrogation, from being level with the ground, to his thigh, then his breast or shoulder, finally settling on his shoulder and 'up high'.
It was The weapon was The weapon was level with the ground... I thought it was on my thigh... I think it might have even been on my breast or my shoulder... I think it was on my shoulder.
8Admission of Finger on Trigger
After repeated questioning, Nemits concedes his finger was 'most likely' on the trigger when the weapon discharged, contradicting earlier implications of an accidental discharge without trigger engagement.
My hand it might have I don't remember if it was that's the thing. I do not I think it Okay. I think it was in it was most likely it was on the fucking it was on the fucking trigger cuz that fucker went off.
9Confession of Trigger Pull
Nemits explicitly states he removed the magazine, put the weapon on fire, and pulled the trigger, believing it was clear, which resulted in his wife being shot in the back of the head.
I took the magazine out. I put the weapon on fire and I pulled the trigger. Okay. Cuz I thought the weapon was clear already... it went off and it struck my my wife in the back of the head and it killed my wife.
10Concealment of Evidence and Lack of Aid
Nemits admits to hiding the rifle in a closet, kicking magazines off the bed, and flushing alcohol down the toilet after the shooting, claiming he was scared due to being underage. He also did not attempt CPR or first aid, and a neighbor made the 911 call.
I went in my bedroom and I saw the weapon. I just threw it into the fucking closet... I just hit him off the bed. I just fucking kicked him... The um the alcohol I had... Cuz I'm I'm not 21 and I was just really scared.
11Suspicion of Infidelity/Motive
Detectives present a Safeway receipt for a dozen roses, purchased with a deceased stepdad's club card, and question Nemits about his wife buying them for a male coworker's wife, implying a potential affair and a possible motive for anger.
There was a bill in the house for uh a receipt rather for a dozen roses from Safeway that was dated yesterday... she bought a dozen roses for his wife or his her coworker's wife... Who's Michael Bolton? Michael Bolton's garage. He's dead... So, how does he still have a Safeway club card then?
12Financial Debt as Potential Stressor
Nemits is confronted about being $17,000 in debt from a car loan, which detectives suggest could be a source of anger or marital strife.
Was it the $17,000 in debt that you guys are in because of my truck?
13Neighbors Reported Arguments
Detectives reveal that neighbors reported hearing Nemits and his wife arguing frequently in the past, contradicting Nemits's portrayal of their relationship as generally harmonious.
Some neighbors have already said they've heard you arguing in the past. Not today, but in the past they've heard arguing coming from your apartment.
14Nemits' Shifting Account of the Shooting
Nemits' description of how the AR-15 fired changes multiple times. He moves from holding the weapon at his thigh, to his shoulder, and then specifies it was 'up on the upper part of my body' in his shoulder pocket, a 'point aim' position, which directly contradicts his claim of an accidental discharge given his extensive military training.
Nemits states, 'I had it like this and I was just... put it in the fire position and pull the trigger' then later, 'it was on my shoulder. It was up on the upper part of my body. I think it was my shoulder in your shoulder.'
15Immediate Post-Shooting Actions Focused on Evidence Tampering
Instead of rendering aid to his fatally wounded wife, Nemits admits to immediately throwing the AR-15 in a closet, sweeping two magazines under the bed, and flushing a bottle of Fireball alcohol down the toilet. He explicitly states he was 'too worried about my own fucking tracks' and 'myself getting in more trouble'.
Nemits details, 'I threw the rifle in the closet... I sweeped it off the bed and I kicked it under under the bed... I grabbed that bottle. I went to the bathroom. I poured it out and then I flushed it twice.'
16Detectives Challenge Nemits' Military Firearm Expertise
Detectives repeatedly confront Nemits with his 9 years of experience with weapon systems and military training, including clearing thousands of weapons and knowing firearm safety rules like 'always treat a weapon like it's loaded' and 'never point anything you're not willing to destroy.' They argue that his actions are inconsistent with someone of his training making a 'fatal error.'
Detective states, 'A guy that's cleared thousands of weapons and cleared weapons today before he turned them in... You know better. Loaded or unloaded, you don't point a rifle at anybody at the back of anybody's head.'
17Discrepancy in Casing Location
Nemits claims the spent casing landed 'right in front of me' inside the bedroom. However, detectives inform him that the casing was found 'out in the fucking hall,' suggesting he was not in the position he described or that he moved the casing.
Nemits: 'It was... in the bedroom.' Detective: 'Well, guess what? It's not in the bedroom. It's out in the fucking hall.'
18CVSA Test and Background Questions
Nemits agrees to take a Computer Voice Stress Analysis (CVSA) test, seemingly eager, but the host notes he is unaware the results are not conclusive. Leading up to the test, a new detective asks extensive background questions about Nemits' family, education, and military career, which the host observes are subtly designed to draw parallels to his relationship with his wife, Danielle.
Nemits states, 'Yeah, that's fine. It's going to take us about 10 or 15 minutes to get set up. Can I get more water?' Host commentary: 'Nemits doesn't notice, but slowly the questions about his parents are becoming about the same issues he had with Danielle.'
19Crime Scene Tampering and Admission of Negligence
Nemitz admitted to actively disturbing the crime scene post-shooting by hiding the AR-15, concealing magazines, and disposing of alcohol. He explicitly stated he 'did not intend to shoot her, but I did intend to disturb the crime scene,' and that his 'acts of negligence' resulted in his wife's death, which the interrogator immediately classified as manslaughter.
Skyler Nemitz stated, 'I did not intend to shoot her, but I did intend to disturb the crime scene.' He also confirmed, 'Yes, sir,' when asked if his 'acts of negligence result in your wife's death.'
20Lack of Emotion and Failure to Render Aid as Incriminating Factors
The interrogator repeatedly highlighted Nemitz's 'emotionless' demeanor and his failure to provide first aid to his critically wounded wife, despite his military training. This behavior was presented as highly suspicious and inconsistent with an accidental shooting, suggesting a deeper, unstated intent.
The interrogator remarked, 'you're about as emotionless as I am... That that's a problem for me.' He later challenged Nemitz, 'You can't. Why did you do that? Why? Answer the fucking question, man.' regarding his failure to apply direct pressure to the wound.
21Suspicion of Affair as a Motive
The detective introduced the discovery of a receipt for red roses Nemitz's wife purchased for someone else, framing it as a common motive for soldiers returning from deployment. Nemitz claimed his wife told him she sent a 'bouquet of flowers' to a coworker's wife for postpartum depression, denying knowledge of red roses or an affair.
The interrogator stated, 'What usually happens in that case with a soldier? What is usually the circumstance? His wife's been fucking around on it. That's usually the case.' He then pointed to the receipt for 'red roses' as an 'unmistakably romantic gesture.'
Bottom Line
Nemits's claim that Danielle did not know the safe combination for her own AR-15, which he left for her protection, contradicts the purpose of providing a firearm for self-defense.
This detail suggests Nemits either intentionally kept her from accessing the weapon or that his narrative about leaving it for her protection is fabricated, implying a deeper level of control or a pre-meditated act.
Further investigation into Danielle's actual knowledge of firearm safety and safe access could expose inconsistencies in Nemits's portrayal of their shared gun practices.
Nemits's immediate question to his wife upon returning home about whether anyone 'messed with' the firearm, despite claiming he trusted her and no prior issues, indicates a pre-existing concern or suspicion.
This 'anal' concern, as Nemits described it, suggests he might have had reasons to believe the gun's state could have changed, or he was preemptively establishing a narrative for a potential incident.
Exploring Nemits's past behaviors or statements regarding firearm security and his wife's interactions with friends could reveal underlying anxieties or motives.
Nemits' initial reaction to his wife's shooting was self-preservation, focusing on hiding evidence and worrying about his own legal trouble, rather than checking on her or calling for help.
This immediate shift to concealment strongly undermines his claim of an accidental shooting, suggesting a premeditated act or at least a rapid decision to cover up a crime of passion.
This behavior pattern could be a critical data point for forensic psychologists analyzing intent in similar cases, highlighting the importance of immediate post-event actions.
The detectives' strategic use of seemingly innocuous background questions about Nemits' family and military life serves to establish a baseline and subtly probe for emotional triggers or behavioral patterns that might mirror his relationship with his wife.
This demonstrates a sophisticated interrogation technique where personal history is leveraged not just for facts, but to build a psychological profile and identify potential motives or points of stress that could lead to confession or further inconsistencies.
This approach offers a model for investigators to gather comprehensive intelligence beyond direct questioning about the crime, potentially revealing deeper psychological motivations or patterns of behavior.
Key Concepts
Cognitive Interviewing / Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE)
Detectives repeatedly present Nemits with evidence (e.g., casing location, his military training) that contradicts his story, forcing him to adapt his narrative or reveal inconsistencies. They also ask open-ended questions about his background to establish a baseline and identify areas of stress or deception.
Deception Detection via Non-Verbal Cues
The host notes Nemits' non-verbal behaviors, such as lowering his head to avoid eye contact when discussing his wife, and taking long pauses, as potential indicators of stress or an attempt to formulate a deceptive response, even when he claims to be 'sick' or 'distraught'.
Lessons
- Understand that inconsistencies in a narrative, especially regarding critical details, will be rigorously challenged by investigators.
- Recognize that actions taken immediately after an incident, such as concealing evidence or failing to render aid, can be interpreted as signs of guilt or intent to obstruct justice.
- Be aware that personal history, financial status, and relationship dynamics can be explored by detectives to establish motive in criminal investigations.
- When faced with an interrogation, understand that seemingly unrelated background questions can be strategic attempts to build a psychological profile or identify inconsistencies.
- Be aware that immediate actions following a traumatic event, such as attempting to conceal evidence, can heavily influence the perception of intent, regardless of initial claims.
- Recognize that 'lie detector' tests like CVSA are investigative tools, not conclusive evidence, and may be used to gauge truthfulness rather than provide definitive proof.
- Understand that post-incident actions, such as disturbing a scene or disposing of evidence, can be interpreted as intent to cover up a crime, regardless of initial intent.
- Be aware that emotional responses (or lack thereof) during an interrogation can significantly influence how investigators and juries perceive a suspect's truthfulness and remorse.
- Recognize that military training in first aid can be used by prosecutors to argue a suspect should have rendered aid, making failure to do so an incriminating factor in negligence or intent cases.
Notable Moments
Nemits's initial 'fake crying' quickly subsides, and he speaks calmly when asked basic questions.
This behavioral shift is noted by the narrator as a potential indicator of insincerity or a calculated performance, suggesting Nemits is not genuinely overwhelmed by grief.
Nemits changes his story about the AR-15's location and how it came to be in the computer room.
Inconsistencies in a suspect's narrative are critical red flags for detectives, indicating potential deception or an attempt to conceal the truth.
Detectives highlight the improbability of an experienced soldier making a 'simple mistake' like putting a rifle on 'fire' before clearing it.
This challenges Nemits's core defense of an accidental discharge, suggesting a deliberate act or gross negligence that contradicts his claimed expertise.
Nemits repeatedly interjects unrelated details and self-serving statements, such as not beating his dogs or criticizing others for cheating.
These behaviors are identified as common tactics used by suspects to distract, appear virtuous, or avoid directly answering difficult questions, further raising detective suspicion.
Nemits offers to take a lie detector test (CVSA) after being pressed on inconsistencies.
While CVSA is not highly accurate, a suspect's willingness or eagerness to take one can be a psychological tool for detectives to observe their reactions and further pressure them.
Detectives inform Nemits that a search warrant will cover the computer, and any evidence of infidelity or motive will be discovered.
This tactic is used to prompt a confession or more truthful account by making the suspect believe that withholding information is futile, as evidence will inevitably surface.
Nemits describes his immediate thoughts after the shooting as being 'Oh my god, I'm alcohol. You're really fucking alcohol' and 'my military career is over. Me. Why is this happening to me?'
This reveals a profound self-centered reaction, prioritizing his own consequences over his wife's life, which the detectives immediately highlight as suspicious.
Nemits admits to fainting at the door in front of his neighbor after being confronted about the gunshot, claiming his body 'just like gave out.'
This moment, whether genuine or performative, adds another layer to his chaotic and self-focused reaction, further distancing him from a narrative of pure accident and concern for his wife.
The detectives introduce the Computer Voice Stress Analysis (CVSA) test, which Nemits eagerly agrees to take, seemingly unaware of its investigative-only nature.
This marks a turning point in the interrogation, as Nemits believes this test will prove his innocence, while the detectives view it as another tool to gather information or observe his reactions.
Nemitz's immediate surrender and statement to police about his wounded wife.
This establishes his initial cooperation but sets the stage for later scrutiny of his actions and demeanor.
The interrogator's direct confrontation about Nemitz's emotionless state and the implications for a jury.
This highlights a key challenge for Nemitz's defense: his perceived lack of remorse or distress, which can be highly prejudicial.
Nemitz's admission that his actions (hiding weapon, dumping alcohol) 'look like I was trying to cover something up.'
This is a critical admission that directly supports the prosecution's narrative of guilt, even if he denies intentional shooting.
The detective's use of the voice stress analysis (96% accurate) as a tool to pressure Nemitz for the 'truth.'
This demonstrates an interrogation tactic designed to elicit further admissions or confessions by convincing the suspect that deception will be detected.
Nemitz's final conviction for first-degree manslaughter and 13-year sentence.
This provides the ultimate outcome of the legal process, confirming the jury's decision based on the presented evidence and arguments.
Quotes
"I did not intentionally mean to murder my wife. I killed my fucking wife. OKAY, I KILLED MY WIFE."
"I don't know what the fuck happened. Like I didn't charge it. I didn't pull the trigger or anything. I I hit the safety. I turned the safety from safe to semi because I was about to charge it to make sure it was clear."
"You've changed your story twice since we've been sitting right here. And I just want to make sure my... I'm not lying about anything."
"The detectives have established that Nemits has cleaned this type of gun thousands of times. The odds of him making this sort of mistake are exceptionally low. The odds of this happening at home without witnesses rather than on the field are even lower."
"You're what we would call somebody that's uh um uh not a novice by any means, but more into the expert of handling guns. You have 15 guns in your home. You uh are in the military and you use M4s all the time... to put it on your leg and it um you know put the weapon accidentally on fire not clearing it with your expertise and then around is this charge hitting your wife in the head. This is uh that doesn't look good."
"Is there a lie detector you can hook me up to?"
"It's not all adding up to the the physical evidence right now. The trajectory."
"The trajectory of that round doesn't match up from the entrance to exit wound doesn't add up to what you told us."
"I took the magazine out... I put the weapon on fire and I pulled the trigger... and it struck my my wife in the back of the head and it killed my wife."
"You didn't think it was on your thigh. You thought the story sounded better. Skyler, I'm not a fucking stupid guy."
"I'm a fucking idiot. I I made one of those one in 10 million mistakes where I was a fucking idiot."
"Your wife was dead with a bullet in the back of her head and you're worried about getting a misdemeanor ticket."
"I understand I killed my fucking wife. OKAY. I KILLED MY WIFE."
"You're more concerned about your military career than a 19-year-old girl that been shot in the back of the head."
"To me, that's intentional. That's not a mistake. You don't make those mistakes."
"I was thinking, 'Oh my god, I'm alcohol. You're really fucking alcohol.' And then my military career is over. Me. Why is this happening to me? To me, me while your wife lays there dead."
"No, let me go hide the crime scene. Let me go get this because I'm the go back in there peek in there and go, 'Oh, she's not breathing. Just a sign of flush alcohol. Get rid of the magazines.' H because it was an act of rage."
"I was too worried about my own fucking tracks for some reason. I was too worried about myself getting in more trouble."
"Loaded or unloaded, you don't point a rifle at anybody at the back of anybody's head."
"Nemits doesn't notice, but slowly the questions about his parents are becoming about the same issues he had with Danielle. His feelings about his parents' situation may give some insight into how he might have acted with Danielle."
"I didn't know there was a receipt for the roses."
"I did not intend to shoot her, but I did intend to disturb the crime scene."
"Your acts of negligence result in your wife's death? Yes, sir. It did. Okay. So, what do we call that? We call that manslaughter."
"It makes you look like a fucking killer. I'm telling you, it makes you look like a fucking killer."
"If you lie, I will fucking know. Absolutely positive of it."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
Psychotic Couple Thinks They Can Get Away With Double Murder
"A couple on the run for assault charges commits a double murder to steal an RV, leading to a cross-border manhunt and their eventual capture in Mexico."
How Detectives Expose a Narcissist
"This episode dissects the chilling interrogation of a self-proclaimed victim turned murderer, revealing how detectives masterfully exploit narcissistic traits to secure a confession."
Mamá me golpeaba, busqué a papá y él me trajo a la cárcel | Yahana #Penitencia 196 #México
"Yahana recounts her harrowing journey from a childhood marred by domestic violence and parental abandonment to drug addiction and eventual incarceration, directly caused by her father's actions."
Student Murders Her Ex-Teacher After Graduation
"A welfare check for a missing retired teacher escalates into a murder investigation when his car is found with a former student, revealing a brutal robbery-homicide driven by drug-induced rage."