🚨 Trump teases NO ELECTIONS in dangerous threat

Donald Trump has made direct statements indicating a desire to bypass or invalidate elections, including 'we shouldn't have an election' and a prior comment about seizing ballot boxes. The hosts interpret these as unfiltered declarations of intent to subvert democratic processes, arguing he has 'lost his subtlety' and is 'telling us exactly what he thinks.'

Trump's quote: 'It's some deep psychological thing, but when you win the presidency, you don't win the midterms. When you think of it, we shouldn't have an election.' He also previously stated, 'I should have seized the ballot boxes.'

A new federal prosecutorial position or 'special counsel' is allegedly being created, reporting directly to the President and Vice President, and operating out of the White House with nationwide jurisdiction over 'amorphous fraud statutes.' The hosts view this as a mechanism to bypass the Department of Justice and target political opponents directly.

The guest details an announcement that a new Department of Justice position, a federal prosecutorial task force or special counsel, would be run out of the White House and report only to Donald Trump and JD Vance (referred to as the Vice President in the discussion).

The Department of Justice is suing 24 states and the District of Columbia to gain access to highly sensitive voter data, including dates of birth, addresses, social security numbers, signatures, and vote history. The hosts argue this data is sought to enable large-scale voter challenges and disenfranchisement, particularly targeting Democratic voters.

The guest states, 'We have the Department of Justice suing 24 states and the District of Columbia to try to get access to its most sensitive voter data. All of the information about you, your date of birth, your address, your social security number, your signature, as well as your vote history.'

The political control of the House and Senate is critical for the certification of future elections. A Democratic majority is presented as essential to prevent 'shenanigans' and challenges to election results, as witnessed in 2020 when 130 House Republicans voted against certification.

The guest explains, 'If you're worried about certification in 2028, you want a Democratic House and Senate because... the House and the Senate are involved in receiving the electors... Republicans in the House in 2020... 130 House Republicans voted against certification.'

A federal judge's analogy describes the erosion of democracy as a gradual process of 'chipping away piece by piece until there is nothing left.' This framework is used to explain that while some 'cuts' (like red states turning over voter data) have occurred, preventing larger 'chips' (like California's voter file) is crucial to maintaining fair elections.

A federal judge in California, rejecting the DOJ's effort to obtain voter data, stated, 'The taking of democracy does not occur in one fell swoop. It is chipped away piece by piece until there is nothing left. The case before the court is one of these cuts that imperils all Americans.'