Bulwark Takes
Bulwark Takes
January 25, 2026

The Minneapolis Shooting Demands a REAL Investigation (w/ Andrew Weissmann)

Quick Read

Andrew Weissmann and Sarah Longwell dissect the Minneapolis ICE shooting, arguing the administration's immediate, untruthful narrative and lack of independent investigation are a dangerous pattern eroding public trust and constitutional rights.
The administration quickly labels victims as domestic terrorists and claims agents feared for their lives, often contradicted by video evidence.
Standard law enforcement protocols for investigation and evidence handling are being ignored, signaling a lack of accountability.
Peaceful protest and gun possession are not death-eligible offenses, yet the administration's narrative implies otherwise, emboldening agents.

Summary

Andrew Weissmann and Sarah Longwell discuss the recent ICE shooting in Minneapolis, where agent Alex Jeffrey Prey, an ICU nurse and American citizen, was killed. They highlight parallels to a previous shooting, emphasizing the administration's rapid, often disproven, official statements that label victims as domestic terrorists and claim agents feared for their lives, even when video evidence contradicts these assertions. Weissmann, a former FBI General Counsel, explains standard law enforcement protocols for investigations and evidence handling, which he argues are being ignored. Both hosts assert that peaceful protesting and carrying a gun are not death-eligible offenses, and the administration's response—or lack thereof—is emboldening agents and undermining justice. They advocate for public vocalness, contacting representatives, and supporting state and local investigations, noting that federal pardons do not apply to state crimes.
This discussion exposes a pattern of government behavior that undermines public trust in law enforcement and the justice system. The administration's consistent narrative, which dismisses video evidence and avoids independent investigations, creates an environment where agents may act with impunity. This erosion of accountability for lethal force, coupled with the disregard for constitutional rights like peaceful protest and filming law enforcement, poses a significant threat to civil liberties and democratic norms.

Takeaways

  • The administration's immediate statements following ICE shootings are often contradicted by available video evidence, mirroring previous incidents.
  • Carrying a gun or peacefully protesting are not death-eligible offenses, and an imminent threat must be proven for lethal force to be justified.
  • The administration's playbook involves denigrating victims and asserting agent fear for life without investigation, even when facts are dubious.
  • Standard law enforcement protocols for evidence collection and independent investigation are being bypassed by the federal government.
  • Filming law enforcement in public is a First Amendment protected activity, and agents interfering with it are violating constitutional rights.
  • State and local authorities can and should conduct independent investigations into state crimes, as federal pardons do not apply to state charges.
  • Politically, ICE overreach is unpopular, and Democrats have an opportunity to leverage public opinion by considering government shutdown over ICE funding.

Insights

1Administration's Untruthful Narrative and Lack of Investigation

The administration consistently issues rapid, official statements following ICE shootings that are quickly disproven by video evidence. They immediately label victims as domestic terrorists and claim agents feared for their lives, without conducting proper investigations. This behavior, seen in the Minneapolis shooting and a prior incident, is a deliberate strategy to control the narrative and avoid accountability.

Steven Miller and other administration figures immediately identified Alex Jeffrey Prey as a 'domestic terrorist' and alleged he brandished a weapon, which video evidence clearly refutes. The administration's official statements were posted quickly on Twitter, preempting any real investigation.

2Violation of Constitutional Rights and Due Process

Peaceful protesting and carrying a gun are constitutionally protected rights and not death-eligible offenses. The administration's justification for lethal force, based on mere possession of a gun or speculation of intent, is a gross overreaction and a violation of fundamental rights. Furthermore, ICE agents have been reported interfering with citizens filming, despite a recent federal judge's ruling protecting this First Amendment activity.

Weissmann states, 'peaceful protesting is not a death eligible offense. Carrying a gun is not a death eligible offense.' He notes the administration's speculation that Prey intended a 'mass shooting of law enforcement' based solely on gun possession. Reports of ICE agents attempting to seize phones and prevent recording are cited.

3Erosion of Accountability and Emboldening of Agents

The administration's consistent backing of ICE agents, regardless of their actions, and refusal to conduct independent investigations creates a culture of impunity. This sends a message that the lives of those upset by these events do not matter, leading to a breakdown of justice and trust in law enforcement.

Weissmann states, 'It is about the administration's response to this that I think really inflames passions because there's no sense of justice being carried out.' He adds, 'ICE agents, no matter what they do, will be backed by this administration.'

4State and Local Authorities as a Path for Justice

While federal authorities are unlikely to investigate impartially, state and local jurisdictions have the power to investigate state crimes committed by federal agents. Crucially, federal pardons do not apply to state charges, offering a potential avenue for accountability. Public cooperation with state investigations by providing evidence is vital.

Weissmann explains, 'If there is a state crime in that state, they can go they can investigate.' He clarifies, 'Donald Trump cannot pardon somebody for state crimes.' He urges witnesses to 'get it to the state locals'.

Lessons

  • Be vocal and contact your representatives at both state and federal levels to express concerns about ICE actions and demand accountability.
  • If you have any video evidence or witness information related to ICE incidents, provide it to state and local law enforcement authorities, as they can conduct independent investigations.
  • Support political leaders who are willing to challenge the administration's policies and funding for agencies like ICE, potentially through legislative action like government shutdowns over funding bills.

Notable Moments

The hosts play a split-screen video showing an administration official (Bavino) giving a press conference justifying the shooting, juxtaposed with actual video footage of the incident, which directly contradicts the official's claims.

This moment visually demonstrates the core argument of the episode: the administration's narrative is demonstrably false and designed to mislead the public, highlighting the severe lack of transparency and truthfulness.

Quotes

"

"Peaceful protesting is not a death eligible offense. Carrying a gun is not a death eligible offense."

Andrew Weissmann
"

"When something like this happens, first that before you make any statement about what happens, you do your complete deep dive to find out what happened. If there was a mistake, you own it and you tell people what happened because you are a public servant and you work for the public."

Andrew Weissmann
"

"To denigrate the victim is the is really the playbook of this administration."

Andrew Weissmann
"

"The issue is not did he have a gun. The issue is, did the agents know he had a gun? And was there any evidence that it was about to be used to harm the agents or anyone else?"

Andrew Weissmann
"

"If this is what they do when they know everyone's filming, what are they doing when people aren't filming?"

Sarah Longwell

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes