Quick Read

Sarah Longwell unveils her new book, 'How to Eat an Elephant One Voter at a Time,' detailing critical shifts in political communication, the power of community, and strategic insights for Democrats to effectively counter Trumpism.
Community, not just audience, drives engagement and loyalty in modern media and politics.
Democrats must become aggressive, clear communicators who build 'parasocial relationships' with voters.
Trump's 'war' strategy relies on low-information voters and could backfire if protracted or if gas prices rise.

Summary

Sarah Longwell discusses her upcoming book, 'How to Eat an Elephant One Voter at a Time,' which focuses on modern political communication and voter behavior. She highlights the challenge of keeping a political analysis book current amidst rapid global events and the importance of pre-orders driven by community engagement, rather than just a broad audience. Longwell argues that the 'Bulwark community' demonstrates a new model for independent media and political engagement, where trust and shared values foster loyalty even amidst disagreement. Her book aims to provide a 'pep talk' for America, explaining how Trump's 2024 reelection was influenced by voter concerns over inflation and perceptions of candidate weakness, rather than pure ideology. She emphasizes the need for Democrats to become more aggressive and clear communicators, building 'parasocial relationships' with voters and defining themselves before opponents do. Longwell also analyzes the significant shift in Republican foreign policy views towards isolationism and how Trump's handling of the 'war' with Iran, by downplaying its severity and relying on low-information voters, could be a precarious strategy, especially if gas prices rise or the conflict becomes protracted. She suggests Trump's current 'cocoon' of yes-men may be diminishing his once-shrewd political instincts.
This discussion offers a high-level strategic framework for understanding contemporary political communication and voter psychology. It provides actionable insights for political campaigns, media organizations, and engaged citizens on how to build trust, communicate effectively, and navigate a rapidly changing political landscape. Longwell's analysis of Trump's communication tactics and potential vulnerabilities, particularly concerning foreign policy and economic impacts, is crucial for anticipating future political dynamics and developing counter-strategies. The emphasis on 'community over audience' also offers a valuable model for cultivating loyal engagement in any public-facing endeavor.

Takeaways

  • Sarah Longwell's book, 'How to Eat an Elephant One Voter at a Time,' analyzes modern political communication and voter shifts over the last eight years.
  • The 'Bulwark community' exemplifies a new model for independent media, where shared values and trust create sticky loyalty, driving book pre-orders.
  • Longwell argues that voters crave 'parasocial relationships' with politicians, needing to know them at a '360-degree angle' to build trust.
  • Democrats need to shift from debating moderation vs. progressivism to becoming more aggressive and effective communicators, acting as 'fighters' who match the moment's urgency.
  • Republican voters have become significantly more isolationist on foreign policy, a shift Trump capitalized on in 2016.
  • Trump's current strategy of downplaying the 'war' with Iran aims to keep low-information voters unaware, but rising gas prices could be a critical vulnerability.
  • Trump's 'cocoon' of yes-men may be eroding his 'lizard cunning' and ability to connect with average Americans' concerns like inflation.

Insights

1The Power of Community in Modern Media and Politics

Sarah Longwell emphasizes that in the current media environment, cultivating a 'community' is more impactful than simply having a large 'audience.' A community is 'sticky' and will 'show up for you,' demonstrating loyalty and engagement far beyond typical viewership. This is evident in the pre-order success of her book, driven by the Bulwark community's desire to support shared values and internal 'gags.'

Longwell states, 'I do have a community, we have a community, this Bulwark community and the community is sticky... they will show up for you.' She notes people pulling over their cars to pre-order the book and wanting it to beat other bestsellers.

2Democrats' Communication Challenge: Aggression Over Ideology

Longwell argues that the Democratic Party's internal debate between moderate and progressive policies is a 'wrong fight.' The real challenge is for Democrats to become more 'aggressive' and better 'communicators.' Voters are looking for 'fighters' who demonstrate urgency and a clear sense of identity, mirroring the moment's significance.

Longwell states, 'We do not need to actually have a fight about whether we be more progressive or more moderate. We do think need to think a lot about how Democrats become more aggressive, how they become better communicators.'

3The Imperative of Self-Definition for Political Candidates

Candidates must clearly define who they are to build trust and prevent opponents from shaping their narrative. Longwell uses Kamala Harris as an example, noting voters' distrust stemmed from not knowing her well enough, allowing them to 'make of her what they wanted.' In contrast, Trump, despite his lies, is perceived as 'clear about who he is,' fostering a 'parasocial relationship' where voters feel they 'know' him.

Longwell explains, 'Kamla's problem wasn't that people it was people could just sort of make of her what they wanted because she didn't give them this like clear sense of who she was. They needed that parasocial relationship to her.' She contrasts this with Trump: 'He is clear about who he is. And voters when they say they're like oh well I know he lies but I think he tells the truth.'

4Shifting Republican Foreign Policy: The New Isolationism

Republican voters have undergone a significant shift towards isolationism, largely due to 'two decades of war' in Iraq and Afghanistan. Trump capitalized on this fatigue in 2016 by attacking Jeb Bush over his brother's war, signaling a departure from the traditional Republican model of exporting democracy.

Longwell notes, 'one of the big shifts has been how different Republican voters are today on foreign policy than they were when I was 22.' She adds, 'Trump basically did two things to make him stand out... One was to get all over Jeb Bush about his brother's war... that's when people realized Trump was right about the voters that... there was this tremendous fatigue about these Middle East wars.'

5Trump's War Strategy: Hiding Protraction from Low-Information Voters

Trump's administration deliberately avoids calling military actions a 'war' to prevent low-information voters from recognizing a protracted conflict. This strategy relies on voters' limited attention span for foreign policy, hoping for 'smash and grab jobs' that are quickly declared victorious. However, this tactic is vulnerable to rising gas prices, which directly impact average Americans and could force them to 'look up' and question the conflict.

Longwell observes, 'I do think Trump, like part of them trying to not call it a war is they're trying to keep it a secret from low-information voters.' She adds, 'those low-information voters have one data point that Trump can't hide from them, which is their gas prices going up.'

6The Erosion of Trump's 'Lizard Cunning' in a Cocoon of Yes-Men

Trump's political instincts, once characterized as 'low cunning' or a 'reptilian ability to understand where the American people were,' may be diminishing. Surrounded by 'yes-men' and billionaires who don't experience everyday economic pressures like gas prices, he is increasingly 'cocooned,' losing touch with the concerns of average voters.

Longwell suggests, 'I think now he is surrounded by people who are like, 'Sir, you have a that this war has a 96% approval among Republicans and they're not telling him that 70% of independents don't like it.' Bill Crystal adds, 'the people in Mara Lago that he's having dinner with don't care about gas prices.'

Lessons

  • Prioritize building a loyal 'community' around your message or brand, fostering shared values and inside references, rather than just chasing a broad 'audience.'
  • Political candidates and communicators must proactively define their identity and core values with aggression and clarity to build trust and prevent opponents from shaping their narrative.
  • For political movements, focus on developing a 'bench' of strong communicators who can connect with voters on a personal, 'parasocial' level, rather than relying solely on 'once-in-a-generation talents.'
  • When communicating about complex issues like foreign policy, recognize that many voters are 'low-information' and focus on tangible impacts (e.g., gas prices) that directly affect their lives.
  • Political strategists should be wary of 'cocooning' leaders with only positive feedback, as this can erode their ability to understand and respond to the genuine concerns of the broader public.

Quotes

"

"I don't have an audience, I do have a community. We have a community, this Bulwark community, and the community is sticky. Like even if you don't love me, you may love the idea that JVL if we sell a sufficient number of copies gets to, you know, we'll let him moderate the focus group that everybody's so desperate for."

Sarah Longwell
"

"We do not need to actually have a fight about whether we be more progressive or more moderate. We do think need to think a lot about how Democrats become more aggressive, how they become better communicators."

Sarah Longwell
"

"Trump is clear about who he is. And voters when they say they're like, 'Oh, well, I know he lies, but I think he tells the truth.' And you're like, 'What is that?' But of course, what they mean is, 'I think he sincerely believes whatever insane thing is coming out of his mouth.'"

Sarah Longwell
"

"I do think they are trying to not say they're in a full-fledged war for as long as they can to see if they can get out of it by saying, 'See how smart Trump was. He went in, he got this thing done and now it's over.'"

Sarah Longwell
"

"I do think he's just losing some of what is a, you always talked about that low cunning, that almost like reptilian ability he had to understand where the American people were. And I think he has lost a lot of that because he is cocooned among yes-men."

Sarah Longwell

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes