HE'S COOKED
YouTube · pbmlipfY0YY
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur were banned from entering the UK, having their Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA) revoked, which the host equates to a visa.
- ❖The UK's ETA system, requiring a £30 online application, replaced the previous visa-on-entry system for Americans, allowing for pre-authorization screening.
- ❖The host believes the UK is banning individuals they 'do not like politically,' citing both Hasan Piker (for comments on Hamas/Israel) and 11 'far-right agitators' for Tommy Robinson's event.
- ❖The host canceled his own planned trip to the UK, including a debate at the Oxford Union, anticipating he would also be denied entry due to his political views.
- ❖The host argues that the US Constitution is 'dead,' having been continuously reinterpreted and violated since its inception, citing historical examples like blasphemy laws, the Second Amendment's evolving application to states, and Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus.
- ❖The host posits that the Constitution is 'whatever a popular group of people wants it to be,' rather than a fixed legal text.
- ❖The host challenges Hasan Piker to a debate in the DC area on the Constitution and the influence of foreign governments, including Israel, on national decisions.
Insights
1UK's ETA System as a Tool for Political Control
The UK implemented an Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA) system, effectively a pre-authorization requirement, which the host believes is primarily used to ban politically undesirable individuals. He cites the revocation of ETAs for Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur, as well as several 'far-right agitators' for a Tommy Robinson event, as evidence of this political screening.
Hasan and Cenk Uygur have been banned from entering the United Kingdom. They had their electronic travel authorization revoked... I think the principal reason they did this is because they have been banning people they do not like politically for some time. [] ...11 far-right agitators banned from UK ahead of rally, government says. []
2The 'Death' of the US Constitution Through Evolving Interpretation and Executive Action
The host argues that the US Constitution is 'dead' because its original meaning has been fundamentally altered by evolving interpretations and executive actions. He points to historical changes in blasphemy laws, the Second Amendment's application to states (defying founding fathers' intent on state sovereignty), and Abraham Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus and arrest of state legislators, which was later retroactively approved by Congress.
The Constitution cannot be betrayed. It can't be. It cannot be because the Constitution, unfortunately, died a long time ago. [] ...If you believe that we should have a right to keep and bear arms within all states... you are defying the will of the founding fathers. [] ...Abraham Lincoln did not have the authority to suspend habeas corpus... Congress has the power to suspend habeas corpus, not the president. And Abraham Lincoln did it anyway. []
3Political Motivation Behind Travel Bans: Disruptive Forces
The host asserts that the UK's bans are not solely about pro-Israel or anti-Israel sentiments, but about suppressing 'destabilizing forces' that challenge the government's 'control structures.' He notes that both pro-Israel (Tommy Robinson's supporters) and anti-Israel (Hasan Piker) figures have been banned, indicating a broader policy against perceived agitators.
Hassan's saying that he's banned because of Israel, well, that's technically the truth. Israel plays a role in this. It's really about, uh, uh, um, I guess what I would describe as destabilizing forces in the perspective of the UK government. [] ...Tommy Robinson's, uh, uh, supporters, largely pro-Israel, himself pro-Israel, they ban him because it's disruptive to their control structures. Hassan is the same thing. []
Key Concepts
Overton Window
The host refers to the 'Overton window' as the range of socially acceptable ideas. He suggests that individuals whose views fall outside this window, even if popular, risk being 'defied' or censored by the government, as seen with the UK travel bans. This model explains how governments might target 'disruptive forces' regardless of their specific ideology.
The Living Constitution (Host's Interpretation)
The host's argument that 'the Constitution is whatever a popular group of people wants it to be' and that it 'died a long time ago' presents a radical interpretation of the 'living constitution' concept. He uses historical examples (blasphemy laws, Second Amendment changes, Lincoln's actions) to illustrate that the Constitution's meaning is not fixed but rather a dynamic product of societal will, judicial interpretation, and executive power, often at odds with the original intent of the founders.
Lessons
- Individuals planning international travel, especially those with public platforms or controversial views, should be aware of evolving electronic travel authorization systems (like the UK's ETA) and potential political screening that can lead to denied entry.
- For those interested in constitutional law, actively research historical interpretations and executive actions (e.g., Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus, evolving Second Amendment rights) to understand how the Constitution's meaning has shifted from its original intent.
- Engage in public discourse and debates on critical issues like constitutional interpretation and government censorship, seeking out platforms that foster genuine disagreement rather than echo chambers, as exemplified by the host's challenge to Hasan Piker.
Notable Moments
The host decides against traveling to the UK for a debate at the Oxford Union, anticipating a ban due to his political views, despite being invited.
This illustrates the chilling effect of perceived political censorship and travel restrictions on public figures, even when invited by prestigious institutions, highlighting a self-censorship or pre-emptive avoidance of potential government intervention.
The host challenges Hasan Piker to a debate on the US Constitution and foreign influence in the DC area, criticizing the UK's decision to ban Piker and Cenk Uygur.
This moment shifts the focus from external censorship to advocating for open debate within the US, suggesting a practical solution to address ideological differences when international platforms are restricted.
Quotes
"I think the principal reason they did this is because they have been banning people they do not like politically for some time."
"How though are you supposed to debate ideas at the Oxford Union when THE COUNTRY HAS BANNED THE IDEAS YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO DEBATE?"
"The Constitution cannot be betrayed. It can't be. It cannot be because the Constitution, unfortunately, died a long time ago. And you may not want to hear that, but it's true."
"Abraham Lincoln defied and betrayed the structure of the United States to preserve the Union. And he is considered to be the most popular president in the history of this nation."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
LEMON DROP | Kamala Harris Speaks Out, Ashley St. Clair Drops Bombshells & Newsom Fires Back
"Kamala Harris, Ashley St. Clair, and Don Lemon dissect the weaponization of the Department of Justice, corporate smear tactics, and the controversial White House invitation for the NBA champions."
Elon Musk’s Scathing Reaction to Grooming Report Goes Viral Fast
"Dave Rubin dissects the alarming British grooming scandal, Elon Musk's viral reaction, and the controversial Iran peace deal, arguing that Western nations are sacrificing their values and security due to political correctness and a failure to confront uncomfortable truths."
“You’re A JOKE!” Trump Shooting Debate & Free Speech ‘Hypocrisy’ | With Cenk Uygur & Glenn Beck
"Piers Morgan and guests debate the political implications of King Charles's US visit, the Secret Service's failures in protecting Donald Trump, the surge in political violence, and the controversial figure of Tommy Robinson."
"CATASTROPHIC Failure!" Trump Dinner Assassination Attempt & Royal Visit | With Kari Lake
"Piers Morgan and Kari Lake dissect the catastrophic security failure during an assassination attempt on Donald Trump at the White House Correspondents Dinner, blaming media rhetoric while also discussing King Charles III's high-stakes US visit."