Bulwark Takes
Bulwark Takes
March 5, 2026

Trump Made an Insane Bet on a Risky War (w/ Derek Thompson) | The Bulwark Podcast

Quick Read

Derek Thompson and Tim Miller dissect the Trump administration's foreign policy and domestic governance, revealing a pattern of executive overreach, transactional decision-making, and the weaponization of obscure legal statutes.
Trump's foreign policy lacks coherence, driven by personal impulses and a 'winner' narrative, even contradicting MAGA's anti-war stance.
The administration systematically finds dormant legal codes ('Control F monarchy') to justify extraordinary executive actions.
The Pentagon's aggressive targeting of AI firm Anthropic highlights the weaponization of regulatory power against private companies.

Summary

Derek Thompson joins Tim Miller to analyze the Trump administration's foreign policy and domestic strategies, particularly focusing on the Iran situation and the weaponization of executive power. Thompson argues that Trump's actions, like the strike in Iran, lack a coherent foreign policy and are driven by personal impulses, a desire for homage, and a 'winning' narrative, often subverting stated MAGA principles of avoiding foreign wars. They introduce the concept of a 'Control F monarchy,' where the administration systematically unearths dormant or esoteric legal codes to justify extraordinary executive powers, as seen in deploying the National Guard or imposing tariffs. This pattern extends to the Pentagon's aggressive labeling of AI company Anthropic as a 'supply chain risk' over contract disputes, effectively attempting to destroy a private company for not complying with government terms. The discussion also touches on the broader implications of AI's potential to empower executive surveillance and the complex motivations of tech oligarchs who align with Trump for deregulation and business opportunities, despite potential authoritarian tendencies. Finally, they briefly discuss the struggling Hollywood industry and the role of political influence in major media mergers.
This episode provides a critical framework for understanding the Trump administration's operational philosophy, highlighting how personal motivations and a 'Control F monarchy' approach can bypass traditional checks and balances, impacting foreign policy, economic regulation, and even the tech industry. For business leaders and policymakers, it reveals the risks of an executive branch willing to weaponize legal code and regulatory power against private entities. For citizens, it underscores the erosion of democratic norms and the potential for advanced technology to enhance governmental surveillance, posing significant questions about the future of governance and individual freedoms.

Takeaways

  • Trump's Iran policy is seen as an extension of his personality, lacking a clear endgame or consistent justification, driven by a desire to 'win' and declare victory.
  • The administration employs a 'Control F monarchy' strategy, unearthing dormant legal codes to grant the executive branch extraordinary powers in domestic, trade, and international policy.
  • The Pentagon labeled AI company Anthropic a 'supply chain risk' using an esoteric statute (Section 3252) after contract negotiations broke down, effectively attempting to destroy the company.
  • The convergence of growing executive power and advanced AI capabilities for mass surveillance creates a 'frightening picture' for American democracy.
  • Tech oligarchs align with Trump for deregulation and business deals, viewing him as a 'counterparty' they can negotiate with, despite potential authoritarian implications.
  • The Hollywood industry is in a secular decline, with movie ticket sales down 40-50% since the pandemic, making media companies distressed assets.
  • GLP-1 drugs, initially for diabetes and weight loss, show promise in treating addiction, neurodegenerative diseases like dementia, and cardiovascular health, indicating a broader therapeutic potential.

Insights

1Trump's Unpredictable Iran Policy Driven by Personality and Transactionalism

The Trump administration's actions in Iran, including the assassination of the Supreme Leader, are characterized by a lack of clear strategy, consistent justification, or defined endgame. Instead, these decisions appear to be an extension of President Trump's personality: a desire for homage, the feeling of winning, and short-term transactional gains. This approach contradicts the MAGA coalition's stated principle of avoiding new foreign wars and engaging in military interventions in the Middle East.

Guest Ruben Gallego found no evidence of imminent attack, consistent justification, or clear endgame for US actions in Iran. Trump's past actions, like tariffs on Switzerland, show a pattern of personal preference over political economy. The policy is demonstrably unpopular, polling at 20-30% approval, even within the MAGA base.

2The 'Control F Monarchy': Weaponizing Obscure Legal Codes

The Trump administration operates by systematically identifying and utilizing dormant or esoteric legal statutes to declare emergencies and grant the executive branch extraordinary powers. This 'Control F monarchy' approach allows them to bypass Congress and traditional legal processes, enabling actions like deploying the National Guard (Statute 10), imposing tariffs (AIPA, 1974 law), or targeting private companies.

Examples include using Statute 10 for National Guard deployment, AIPA for tariffs (later struck down), and a never-before-used 1974 law for new tariffs. This pattern suggests a deliberate search for latent authoritarianism within the US legal code.

3Pentagon's Aggressive Regulation: Attempting to 'Murder' an AI Company

The Pentagon's decision to label AI company Anthropic as a 'supply chain risk' under Section 3252, typically reserved for foreign saboteurs like Huawei, is an egregious overreach. This action, taken after contract negotiations broke down over Anthropic's ethical limits on AI use (e.g., mass surveillance, autonomous weapons), is seen as an attempt to destroy a private company for not complying with government terms, violating principles of private property and free-market capitalism.

Pete Hexath, Secretary of War, used Section 3252 to effectively bar Anthropic from doing business with any company that contracts with the Pentagon (Amazon, Google, Microsoft). This move is sharply ironic given the Trump administration's general anti-regulation stance on AI, making the federal government the 'most aggressive regulator' in the developed world.

4AI and the Rise of Executive Surveillance Power

The confluence of an increasingly powerful executive branch and advanced artificial intelligence poses a significant threat to American democracy. AI's ability to rapidly process and correlate vast amounts of personal data could transform government surveillance, making it easier and cheaper for an administration to build cases against critics or surveil populations, potentially creating a '21st-century panopticon' that eliminates personal freedoms.

The Biden administration's concern about China building a surveillance state with AI highlights this risk. The ease with which AI agents could pull together 'extraordinarily personal information about Americans at the drop of a hat' fundamentally changes the 'microeconomics of government surveillance'.

5Tech Oligarchs' Transactional Alignment with Trump

Many tech oligarchs, despite potential ideological reservations, align with the Trump administration because they perceive him as a 'counterparty' with whom they can negotiate deals and achieve deregulation, particularly in areas like crypto and AI. This transactional relationship prioritizes financial gain and market freedom over concerns about democratic norms or potential authoritarianism, leading to policies that benefit their business interests.

The tech right's support for Trump is linked to desires for crypto deregulation and an 'unfettered globalization' policy for AI, contrasting with the Biden administration's more regulatory approach. The significant deregulation of crypto under Trump is cited as evidence of this bet paying off.

6Hollywood's Irreversible Decline and Politically Influenced Mergers

The traditional Hollywood movie industry is in a severe, secular decline, with movie ticket sales plummeting by 40-50% since the pandemic, indicating it will likely never recover to pre-2020 levels. This macroeconomic distress drives consolidation and job losses. Mergers within this struggling industry, such as the potential Paramount-WBD deal, are further complicated by political influence, where antitrust decisions and deal approvals appear to be based on personal connections to the administration rather than pure market dynamics.

Americans bought 35 movie tickets/year in the 1940s, now 2.5-2.7/year. Movie ticket sales are down 40-50% since the pandemic. The proposed Paramount-WBD merger involves David Ellison, son of Larry Ellison (a close Trump ally), suggesting political favoritism in antitrust decisions. The CEO of WBD stands to make $800-900 million from a sale that will likely lead to thousands of job losses, highlighting moral concerns.

7GLP-1 Drugs: A Multi-faceted Medical Breakthrough

GLP-1 receptor agonists, initially developed for diabetes and later found to be effective for weight loss, are now revealing a broader therapeutic potential. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring their efficacy in treating conditions like addiction, neurodegenerative diseases (dementia, Alzheimer's), and improving cardiovascular health, even in individuals not losing weight. This suggests GLP-1s act on multiple biological pathways, offering hope for previously intractable medical challenges.

Eli Lilly, maker of Mounjaro and Zepbound, is conducting Phase 2 and 3 trials for GLP-1 versions targeting addiction and neurodegenerative health. The drugs reduce inflammation and improve cardiovascular health independent of weight loss. This 'splayed hand' effect, pushing five buttons at once, is a significant scientific advancement.

Bottom Line

The Trump administration's 'Control F monarchy' approach to governance, while seemingly chaotic, represents a predictable pattern of executive power expansion that can be anticipated by legal experts.

So What?

This predictability allows for proactive legal challenges and preparedness for future executive actions, potentially mitigating their impact on democratic institutions and individual rights.

Impact

Develop AI-powered legal analysis tools to 'run ahead' of administrations, identifying latent authoritarian statutes or emergency powers that could be weaponized, enabling preemptive legal and policy responses.

The transactional alignment of tech oligarchs with a potentially authoritarian administration reveals a prioritization of business interests (deregulation, market access) over broader democratic concerns.

So What?

This dynamic suggests that economic incentives can override ideological or ethical considerations for powerful industry players, potentially enabling the erosion of democratic norms in exchange for favorable business environments.

Impact

Advocacy groups and policymakers should highlight the long-term risks of such alliances, emphasizing how unchecked corporate power, enabled by a compliant government, can lead to market distortions and societal harms, beyond immediate financial gains.

Key Concepts

Control F Monarchy

A term coined by Derek Thompson to describe the Trump administration's systematic approach of searching through the entire US legal code (like using 'Control F') to discover and revive dormant or esoteric statutes that grant the executive branch extraordinary, often unchecked, emergency powers. This allows the administration to bypass traditional legislative processes and justify actions in domestic, trade, and foreign policy that might otherwise be unconstitutional or unpopular.

Poster Politician Divide

An idea by Derek Thompson suggesting that the online debate (among 'posters') about political ideologies, like 'abundance' principles, often appears far more polarized and conflicting than the actual actions of politicians. While online, certain ideas might be framed as mutually exclusive, in practice, politicians often adopt pragmatic approaches that integrate elements from different ideological camps to achieve practical outcomes, such as progressive leaders embracing supply-side housing reforms.

Lessons

  • Monitor executive actions for patterns of 'Control F monarchy' governance, where obscure legal codes are invoked to expand power, and prepare legal challenges.
  • Advocate for clear legislative limits on executive emergency powers and the use of AI in surveillance to prevent the erosion of democratic freedoms.
  • Understand the complex motivations of powerful industry leaders, recognizing that their support for political figures may be driven by specific business interests like deregulation, rather than broader ideological alignment.

The 'Control F Monarchy' Playbook for Executive Power Expansion

1

Identify a perceived 'emergency' or crisis that justifies extraordinary government intervention.

2

Conduct a systematic search of the entire legal code to unearth dormant, esoteric, or rarely used statutes that grant the executive branch broad powers.

3

Invoke these obscure laws to bypass Congress and traditional legal processes, implementing desired policies in domestic, trade, or foreign affairs.

4

Engage in court battles to defend these actions, leveraging the ambiguity or historical precedent of the unearthed statutes to push the boundaries of executive authority.

Notable Moments

Discussion on the psychological similarity between a 'hot streak' at a craps table and Trump's approach to foreign policy, where initial 'easy wins' (like Venezuela) lead to increased hubris and risk-taking (like Iran).

This analogy provides a vivid, if crude, psychological framework for understanding the impulsive and escalating nature of Trump's foreign policy decisions, suggesting a lack of long-term strategic thinking.

The hosts' personal reflection on the poster-politician divide, where online ideological debates are far more rigid than the pragmatic realities faced by politicians in executive roles.

This highlights the disconnect between online discourse and real-world governance, suggesting that practical outcomes often necessitate a more flexible and less ideologically pure approach than is often portrayed in media.

Derek Thompson's personal insight into parenting as 'falling in love with a sequence of strangers' and Tim Miller's related experience with adopting a child.

This offers a profound philosophical reflection on the nature of love, change, and human connection, extending beyond the political and business themes to touch on universal human experiences.

Quotes

"

"The universal theory of attacking Iran is that Donald Trump does whatever the hell he wants whenever the hell he wants and doesn't ask Congress for permission and the Republicans in Congress roll over and say, 'Sure, take whatever article one power you want and make it the new prerogative of the executive branch.'"

Derek Thompson
"

"It seems like over and over again the administration is almost like teaching us a lesson in the degree to which American law justifies authoritarianism if you dig deep enough."

Derek Thompson
"

"That's an attempt to murder a company as a as the result of simply not getting what they want out of negotiations. That is a direct violation I think of the principle of private property."

Derek Thompson
"

"The rise of monarchical powers in the executive branch and the incredible falling price of mass surveillance and the things that autonomous AI agents could do with it, that's a frightening picture."

Derek Thompson
"

"The movie industry is never coming back. The film sold about 1.2, 1.6 billion movie tickets a year every year of the 21st century before 2020. At this rate, at current trajectory, we're never going to buy another 100. Americans will never buy 1 billion movie tickets ever again. Ever again."

Derek Thompson
"

"You don't raise a singular baby. You raise a series of babies that keep changing yet retain the basic facial structure of the baby that you gave born that that the that the woman gave gave birth to. And there's something really beautiful about this idea that being a parent therefore means falling in love with the sequence of strangers that keep reappearing behind your child's face."

Derek Thompson

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

SHOCK BREAKING: TRUMP PRESSER JUST MADE ME NEARLY THROW UP!
The Luke Beasley ShowMar 26, 2026

SHOCK BREAKING: TRUMP PRESSER JUST MADE ME NEARLY THROW UP!

"The host details a "nauseating" Trump cabinet meeting, dissecting his rambling, his cabinet's "pampering," and his questionable statements on war and policy, alongside a progressive Christian politician's impactful response to a death threat."

Political CommentaryCabinet MeetingsUS National Debt+2
Did Israel Drag Us Into the Iran War?
Bulwark TakesMar 3, 2026

Did Israel Drag Us Into the Iran War?

"The US administration's rationale for its large-scale military action against Iran is critiqued as incoherent and potentially influenced by Israel's independent actions, while a major conflict between the Pentagon and leading AI firm Anthropic highlights the urgent need for congressional regulation on AI's military and surveillance applications."

US Foreign PolicyExecutive PowerCongressional Oversight+2
Trump And Hegseth BUSTED For Iran War LIES!! Tucker Carlson & Joe Kent SLAM Israel’s Aggression
The Young TurksApr 10, 2026

Trump And Hegseth BUSTED For Iran War LIES!! Tucker Carlson & Joe Kent SLAM Israel’s Aggression

"The Young Turks expose alleged lies from the Trump administration and Pete Hegseth about the Iran war, criticize Israel's role in escalating conflicts, and highlight widespread political corruption, while Melania Trump addresses Epstein ties and Trump attacks his conservative critics."

US Foreign PolicyMiddle East ConflictIsrael-Palestine Conflict+2
MAGA Stooge Freezes After My Question on CNN
The Adam Mockler ShowApr 3, 2026

MAGA Stooge Freezes After My Question on CNN

"Adam Mockler dissects the Trump administration's claims of 'total victory' in foreign conflicts and its alleged attempts to politicize the Department of Justice, arguing these actions undermine democratic institutions and moral leadership."

US PoliticsForeign PolicyDepartment of Justice+2