Emiliano Aguilar en vivo se enfrenta a sus manager - Gustavo Adolfo humillado por amigo | JC

Alfonso Beceiro, Gustavo Adolfo Infante's lawyer, publicly announced his decision to cease representing Infante. Beceiro stated that Infante had disavowed his negotiation efforts with Alfredo Adame, despite having given prior consent and knowledge of these discussions. Beceiro expressed feeling undermined and called Infante 'ungrateful,' highlighting the significant legal fees he had saved Infante.

Beceiro's public statement detailing Infante's consent to negotiations for a public apology to Infante's mother, Infante's subsequent public denial of authorizing such agreements, and Beceiro's declaration of withdrawal, citing Infante's ingratitude and disrespect for his legal work.

Emiliano Aguilar publicly accused his former manager, Roque, of stealing thousands of dollars from him, including specific amounts like $12,000 and $9,700 from various sources, and an advance from Univision. Emiliano also alleged that Roque tried to 'own' him by requesting his apostilled birth certificate and was attempting to sell visas using Emiliano's name. He claimed Roque paid band members very little while keeping most of the earnings.

Emiliano's direct accusations during the live broadcast, detailing specific amounts allegedly stolen, and his claims that Roque sought his birth certificate for control and was illicitly selling visas. He also mentioned Roque's alleged low payments to band members.

Roque, Emiliano Aguilar's former manager, through his lawyer Gerardo Rincón, is pursuing a lawsuit against Emiliano. The lawsuit stems from Emiliano's public accusations, including calling Roque a 'narcotraficante' and associating him with 'organized crime.' Roque and his lawyer assert that a valid management contract between Roque and Emiliano was breached, and that Emiliano's defamatory statements have caused significant professional and personal damage.

Gerardo Rincón's statement confirming the defamation lawsuit, detailing Emiliano's accusations against Roque, and asserting the existence of a valid, active management contract that Emiliano allegedly breached. Roque also mentioned losing contracts and clients due to the accusations.

Karina Yapor and Carla de la Cuesta, identified as victims in the Sergio Andrade case, expressed renewed frustration and criticism towards Gloria Trevi. They accused Trevi of continuously profiting from the 'clan' narrative through movies and television series, which they believe re-victimizes the survivors. The host echoed this sentiment, questioning Trevi's motives for repeatedly bringing up the past for personal gain.

Karina Yapor's and Carla de la Cuesta's public statements on social media, as cited and discussed by the host, expressing anger over Trevi's continued monetization of the 'clan' story through media projects.

Carlita La Santera revealed that a medium had warned Alicia Villarreal about her partner, Sibad, suggesting his motives were primarily economic and that he had allegedly threatened the medium. Regarding Emiliano Aguilar, Carlita predicted that he might attempt to reconcile with his family this year, but cautioned that this would be a 'worst error,' as his family would likely use him again for their benefit and then discard him.

Carlita La Santera's statements, attributing information to a medium regarding Sibad's alleged economic motivations and threats, and her direct prediction about Emiliano's potential reconciliation with his family and its negative consequences.