"Crushing rejection!" Jeanine Pirro gets BRUTAL NEWS in court

Chief Judge James Boseberg of the D.C. Federal District Court issued a 22-page ruling blocking subpoenas issued by US Attorney Janine Pirro against Jerome Powell. The judge concluded there was 'abundant evidence' that the subpoenas' 'dominant, if not sole, purpose' was to harass and pressure Powell to either yield to the president's demands or resign.

The judge's 22-page ruling explicitly states the subpoenas' purpose was harassment and pressure, not a legitimate criminal investigation. The US Attorney's office provided no evidence of a crime, even when given a private opportunity to do so.

Despite the subpoenas, the US Attorney's office, led by Janine Pirro, offered 'no evidence whatsoever' that Jerome Powell committed any crime. The judge noted that Powell's only 'crime' was 'displeasing the president,' which is not a legal offense. This absence of evidence, even after a private submission opportunity, exposed the unethical nature of the subpoenas.

Judge Boseberg stated, 'The government, meaning the DOJ, the prosecutors, offered no evidence whatsoever that Powell committed any crime other than displeasing the president.' He later confirmed they submitted 'zero nothing' privately.

Prosecutors like Janine Pirro, who engage in such abuses of power, face significant professional consequences, including potential disbarment. This is not an isolated incident, as several Trump administration lawyers have already faced or are facing ethics investigations and disbarment proceedings for similar misconduct.

Glenn mentions Ed Stop the Steel Martin, Pirro's predecessor, is facing a DC bar ethics investigation for gross abuse of prosecutorial discretion and could be disbarred. He states, 'The Trump White House to disbarment pipeline is strong these days.'

Each failed attempt at a politically motivated prosecution, like the one against Jerome Powell, creates a 'mountain of evidence' that future targets can use in court. Judges, like Boseberg, are incorporating these past instances into their rulings, eroding the 'presumption of regularity' that typically favors government actions and making it harder for the Department of Justice to misuse its power successfully.

Judge Boseberg's opinion includes references to other instances where the Trump administration misused DOJ power. Glenn states, 'They are building into every case in the future... a just a great mountain of evidence that each target of Donald Trump's wrath will be able to use in court officially to bolster their cause.'