Liberals LOSE THEIR MINDS Over Pete Hegseth Feeding US Troops Steak, King Crab, And Lobster Tails!
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖A new analysis by Open Books found the Secretary of Defense spent $93 billion in September 2025, including $2 million on Alaskan king crab, $6.9 million on lobster tail, and $15.1 million on ribeye steaks.
- ❖This spending occurs at the end of the fiscal year due to a 'use it or lose it' policy, where federal agencies spend remaining funds to avoid budget reductions in the next year.
- ❖The host characterizes the criticism from liberals as 'fake outrage,' arguing they typically do not oppose government spending unless it can be used to attack conservatives.
- ❖The host asserts that US troops, who fight and die for the country, deserve to be well-fed, including with quality meals like steak and lobster.
- ❖He criticizes the comparison of military food spending to restrictions on SNAP benefits, calling it 'stupid' and incomparable, as one group works to protect the nation while the other receives welfare.
Insights
1Pentagon's $93 Billion Year-End Spending Spree
An analysis by Open Books revealed the Secretary of Defense spent $93 billion in September 2025 alone. This included significant amounts on luxury food items: $2 million on Alaskan king crab, $6.9 million on lobster tails, and $15.1 million on ribeye steaks, along with other items like ice cream machines and donuts.
Host cites a new analysis by Open Books detailing the September 2025 spending figures, including specific amounts for various food items.
2'Use It or Lose It' Budgetary Incentive
The host explains that federal government agencies operate on a 'use it or lose it' budget system. If funds allocated for a fiscal year are not spent by September (the fiscal year end), they are lost, and the agency's budget for the following year may be reduced. This creates an incentive for departments to spend all allocated money.
Host's explanation: 'If you don't spend the money as a federal government agency in September, the fiscal year ends and so you lose the money.' and 'the incentive is to spend all the money because they've already been allocated the money and they don't want to lose the money next year.'
3Defense of Feeding Troops 'Luxury' Meals
The host argues that military personnel, who put their lives on the line for the country, deserve to be well-nourished, including with meals like steak and lobster. He dismisses the idea that this is wasteful, suggesting it's important for troop morale and energy, and that the quality is likely 'cafeteria' grade, not high-end restaurant food.
Host's statement: 'I don't have a problem with them eating steak and lobster.' and 'I don't think it's a good idea to have hungry troops.' He also speculates on quality: 'This is mass-produced stuff... some cafeteria steak and lobster.'
4Critique of 'Fake Liberal Outrage' and Hypocrisy
The host frames the criticism of military food spending as 'fake liberal outrage,' alleging that liberals only care about government spending when it can be used to attack conservatives or Trump. He highlights a perceived hypocrisy, noting a lack of similar outrage over other forms of fraud (e.g., Somali fraud, fake hospice businesses) or spending on illegal immigrants, while simultaneously criticizing military welfare.
Host states: 'one of the most pathetic examples of fake liberal outrage I've ever seen.' and 'they're never outraged by spending, right? Ever.' He also contrasts it with 'hundreds of millions of dollars in Los Angeles that are fraudulently being used to prop up fake hospice businesses.'
Key Concepts
Use It or Lose It (Government Budgeting)
A common practice in government agencies where unspent funds at the end of a fiscal year are forfeited, potentially leading to a reduced budget in the following year. This incentivizes departments to spend their full allocation, often resulting in year-end spending sprees on non-essential items or accelerated purchases.
Lessons
- When evaluating government spending, consider the underlying budgetary mechanisms like 'use it or lose it' policies, which can drive year-end expenditures.
- Critically assess political narratives around spending, particularly when comparisons are drawn between different groups (e.g., military vs. welfare recipients), to identify potential biases or political motivations.
- Recognize that discussions about military welfare often involve considerations of morale, readiness, and the perceived value of service, which can differ from debates around social welfare programs.
Notable Moments
The host highlights the perceived hypocrisy of critics who are outraged by military spending on food but not by other forms of government waste or fraud, such as 'Somali fraud' or 'fake hospice businesses' in Los Angeles.
This moment underscores the host's argument that the outrage is selective and politically motivated, rather than genuinely concerned with wasteful spending, by contrasting the criticized spending with other alleged financial mismanagement.
The host vehemently rejects the comparison between military personnel eating steak and lobster and SNAP beneficiaries doing the same, calling it 'stupid' and arguing the two groups are not comparable due to their respective contributions to society.
This is a central point of contention, illustrating how different political perspectives value and justify spending on distinct segments of the population, framing military service as deserving of higher-quality provisions.
Quotes
"If you don't spend the money as a federal government agency in September, the fiscal year ends and so you lose the money."
"This is one of the most pathetic examples of fake liberal outrage I've ever seen."
"You have to have an IQ lower than room temperature to think that comparing the military spending money feeding our troops steak and lobster, to compare that to people spending their food stamps on steak and lobster, to think that that's the same thing."
"I'm more than happy to pay taxes to make sure our military eat good. I'm more than happy to pay for that."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes
Republicans Don't Even Pretend to Care About Debt (w/ Jessica Riedl) | Mona Charen Show
"Both Republican and Democratic parties have abandoned fiscal responsibility, leading the U.S. towards an inevitable debt crisis exacerbated by demographic shifts and ineffective policy approaches."
Zohran Mamdani Begs For Tax Hike To FUND LGBTQ Office As Credit Agency Issues BRUTAL Warning To NYC!
"New York City faces a $5.4 billion budget deficit and a potential credit downgrade, yet progressive leaders like Zohran Mamdani advocate for tax hikes to fund new social programs, a strategy the host argues will accelerate a mass exodus of talent and businesses."
Republicans Said Government Spending Was a Crisis
"The host exposes the alleged fiscal hypocrisy of prominent Republican figures who promised massive spending cuts but oversaw significant increases, including a costly, undefined war."
New York Democrats RAGE As Zohran Mamdani THREATENS NUCLEAR OPTION After Socialist Budget REJECTION!
"New York City Council Member Zohran Mamdani threatens a 9.5% property tax hike, dubbed the 'nuclear option,' if state lawmakers reject his proposal to raise taxes on the wealthy, sparking widespread political backlash and host criticism."