Brian Tyler Cohen
Brian Tyler Cohen
March 1, 2026

EXPLOSIVE: Trump's secret executive order LEAKED

YouTube · uaM2moLzqmg

Quick Read

A leaked draft executive order reveals former President Trump's alleged plan to seize unprecedented control over federal elections, sparking legal warnings of an unconstitutional power grab.
A leaked draft executive order details a plan to centralize control over federal elections, covering voter registration, ID, and ballot processes.
Legal experts contend the order is unconstitutional, as the President lacks authority over federal elections and relies on misapplied emergency powers.
The order reflects former President Trump's public demands for strict voter ID and limited mail-in voting, despite evidence debunking widespread voter fraud.

Summary

Democracy Docket reporters obtained a leaked draft executive order, dated April 12th, 2025, from Peter Tictton, a lawyer close to former President Trump. This sweeping order invokes emergency powers under unrelated acts to redefine voting processes, including voter registration, proof of citizenship, voter ID, and ballot design. The hosts, Mark Elias and Brian Tyler Cohen, assert that such an order would be an illegal and unconstitutional power grab, as the President lacks authority over federal elections. They connect the draft to Trump's public statements insisting on voter ID and restricted mail-in ballots, regardless of Congressional action. Elias warns that any attempt to implement such an order would be met with extensive litigation, describing it as a 'whack-a-mole' legal battle across states and counties. The hosts also present evidence debunking widespread voter fraud claims, framing the executive order as a pretext for voter suppression.
This discussion highlights a potential strategy to fundamentally alter the administration of federal elections through executive action, bypassing legislative processes. It underscores the fragility of electoral integrity and the proactive legal and media efforts required to counter perceived threats to democratic norms. For citizens, it reveals the specific mechanisms that could be used to restrict voting access and the legal battles that would ensue.

Takeaways

  • A draft executive order from former President Trump's orbit outlines a plan to assert presidential control over federal elections, including voter registration, ID, and ballot procedures.
  • Legal analysis indicates the order is unconstitutional, as the President has no authority over federal elections and misuses emergency powers.
  • The proposed measures are framed as voter suppression tactics, given the documented lack of widespread voter fraud, which the order purports to address.

Insights

1Leaked Draft Executive Order for Election Control

Reporters at Democracy Docket obtained a draft executive order, dated April 12th, 2025, from Peter Tictton, a lawyer connected to former President Trump. This order is described as 'sweeping' and aims to redefine how voting occurs in the U.S., covering voter registration, proof of citizenship, voter ID, ballot design, ballot counting, and absentee ballot procedures. It invokes emergency powers under various acts, which the hosts argue are unrelated to elections.

The draft order, provided by Peter Tictton, is dated April 12th, 2025, and covers aspects like voter registration, proof of citizenship, voter ID, ballot design, ballot counting, and absentee ballots. It cites the Defense Production Act and other emergency acts.

2Illegality and Unconstitutionality of the Proposed Order

Mark Elias, the guest, emphatically states that the executive order would be a 'completely illegal and unconstitutional power grab.' He argues that the President of the United States has no constitutional authority over federal elections and that the invocation of emergency powers under unrelated acts is baseless. The host, Brian Tyler Cohen, also highlights the potential for Republican officials and sympathetic judges to attempt to enforce such an order despite its illegality.

Elias states, 'it would be a massive massive voter suppression operation and also Brian a completely illegal and unconstitutional power grab by the president of the United States who has no authority under the Constitution to do anything with respect to federal elections.'

3Trump's Public Statements Align with Leaked Order's Intent

The hosts connect the leaked executive order's content to former President Trump's public statements on social media. Trump explicitly stated there would be voter ID for midterm elections and restrictions on mail-in ballots, 'whether approved by Congress or not.' This suggests an intent to implement these changes via executive action, aligning with the leaked draft.

Trump's social media post stated: 'There will be voter ID for the midterm elections whether approved by Congress or not. Also, the people of this country are insisting on citizenship and no mail-in ballots with exception for military disability illness or travel.'

4Anticipated 'Whack-a-Mole' Legal Battle

Mark Elias predicts that if such an executive order is attempted, the legal response will not be a single, orderly lawsuit but rather a fragmented 'whack-a-mole' scenario. This involves numerous lawsuits against individual states, counties, and local election deniers who might attempt to enforce the order, creating a complex and resource-intensive legal challenge.

Elias states, 'This is going to be playing whack-a-mole with crazy election deniers all around the country.' He emphasizes the need to 'sue a lot of places' if red states or local officials adopt Trump's directives.

5Voter Fraud Claims Debunked as Pretext for Suppression

The hosts cite research demonstrating the extreme rarity of voter fraud, particularly impersonation fraud. This evidence suggests that the focus on 'voter integrity' and measures like strict voter ID are not solutions to a widespread problem but rather a 'Trojan horse' designed to suppress votes from demographics less likely to support Republicans.

Justin Levit's book, 'The Truth About Voter Fraud,' reviewed a billion ballots from 2000-2014 and found only 31 credible instances of impersonation fraud. A Utah review for non-citizens on voter rolls found only one, who had never voted.

Lessons

  • Support independent media outlets like Democracy Docket and channels like Brian Tyler Cohen's, as they are crucial for disseminating information on election integrity issues that traditional media may overlook.
  • Be prepared for and support legal challenges against any executive orders or local actions that attempt to unilaterally alter election procedures, as these efforts will likely involve extensive, decentralized litigation.
  • Educate yourself and others on the factual rarity of voter fraud to counter narratives used to justify restrictive voting measures, understanding that such measures often serve as tools for voter suppression.

Quotes

"

"It would be a massive massive voter suppression operation and also Brian a completely illegal and unconstitutional power grab by the president of the United States who has no authority under the Constitution to do anything with respect to federal elections."

Mark Elias
"

"There will be voter ID for the midterm elections whether approved by Congress or not. Also, the people of this country are insisting on citizenship and no mail-in ballots with exception for military disability illness or travel."

Donald Trump (quoted from social media)
"

"This is going to be playing whack-a-mole with crazy election deniers all around the country."

Mark Elias
"

"This is a solution in search of a problem. And that underscores the fact that this was never about eliminating some widespread voter fraud because that widespread voter fraud doesn't exist. It is just a Trojan horse to be able to suppress the votes of people that Donald Trump and Republicans don't think are going to vote for Donald Trump and Republicans."

Brian Tyler Cohen

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

Major SCOTUS "Birthright Citizenship" Case, and Charlie Kirk Murder Trial Bullet Questions
The Megyn Kelly ShowApr 1, 2026

Major SCOTUS "Birthright Citizenship" Case, and Charlie Kirk Murder Trial Bullet Questions

"Megyn Kelly and legal experts dissect the Supreme Court's oral arguments on birthright citizenship and break down new, potentially exculpatory evidence in the Charlie Kirk murder trial, including an 'inconclusive' bullet match and complex DNA findings."

Birthright Citizenship14th AmendmentImmigration Policy+2
INSTANT FALLOUT from MAJOR Supreme Court Decision... | PoliticsGirl
Legal AF PodcastMay 6, 2026

INSTANT FALLOUT from MAJOR Supreme Court Decision... | PoliticsGirl

"The Supreme Court's recent decision in Louisiana v. Cala effectively gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, opening the door for widespread racial gerrymandering and signaling a return to Jim Crow-era voter suppression tactics."

Voting Rights ActSupreme Court DecisionsRacial Gerrymandering+2
LIVE: Lawyers and Fmr. Judges STRIKE BACK as Trump Threatens Courts
The Intersection with Michael PopokMay 1, 2026

LIVE: Lawyers and Fmr. Judges STRIKE BACK as Trump Threatens Courts

"Former federal and state judges, alongside leading lawyers, unite to defend the independent judiciary and the rule of law against unprecedented political attacks and the erosion of public trust."

Judicial IndependencePolitical RhetoricCivics Education+2
“Explosive!” New Republican ballot scandal SURGES INTO NEWS
Brian Tyler CohenMar 24, 2026

“Explosive!” New Republican ballot scandal SURGES INTO NEWS

"A California sheriff and gubernatorial candidate seized over half a million ballots, an act the hosts frame as a dangerous escalation in Republican efforts to undermine election integrity and normalize ballot seizures."

Election IntegrityBallot SeizureGerrymandering+2