LIVE: Trump DOJ in TOTAL MELTDOWN after DEFEAT

Federal Judge Boseberg threw out subpoenas issued by US Attorney Janine Piro's office to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, finding 'abundant evidence' that their 'dominant, if not sole purpose, is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the president or to resign.' The judge's unsealed ruling opened with direct quotes from the President attacking Powell.

Judge Boseberg's unsealed filing stated, "There is abundant evidence that the subpoena's dominant, if not sole purpose, is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the president or to resign and make way for a Fed chair who will." The ruling began by quoting presidential attacks on Powell, such as, "Jerome, too late, pal, has done it again. He's too late and actually too angry, too stupid, and too political to have the job of Fed chair."

Following the judge's ruling and the unsealing of the embarrassing details, US Attorney Janine Piro held a press conference where she became visibly agitated, stormed out, and made statements that legal experts characterized as fundamentally misunderstanding the criminal justice system and the limits of prosecutorial power.

Piro stated, "This judge has put himself at the entrance door to the grand jury, slamming that door shut, irrespective of the legal process, and thus preventing the grand jury from doing the work that it does." She also claimed, "I can merely on the suspicion that the law is being violated or even just because I want assurance that it's not." The hosts directly refuted these claims, citing Judge Boseberg's ruling that courts 'may quash subpoenas that the government has issued for an improper purpose' and that prosecutors 'may not use the grand jury quote to engage in arbitrary fishing expeditions.'

Shortly after the Powell subpoena defeat, Piro's office dismissed charges against a veteran who burned a flag to protest an executive order banning flag burning. This dismissal, alongside other failed political targeting cases, underscores a pattern of the Trump DOJ pursuing legally unsound cases.

The hosts detailed the dismissal of charges against a veteran who burned a flag to protest an 'illegal and unconstitutional' executive order. They noted, "We all knew this case wasn't going to go anywhere fast. But on the eve of having to file stuff with the court, what does Janine P's office do? She ends up basically filing a motion to dismiss, which is tantamount to her dropping the charges against this man."