BREAKING: MAJOR UPDATE on NEW Epstein lawsuit

A judge denied the request by Congressmen Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie for a special master to oversee the release of Epstein files, citing their lack of standing. The judge, however, acknowledged 'legitimate concerns' about DOJ compliance and suggested a lawsuit as an avenue for representatives. Khanna confirms they are exploring new lawsuits, potentially involving survivors as plaintiffs, to establish standing.

The judge's finding stated Massie and I raised 'legitimate concerns' about DOJ's compliance and lack of producing documents, and suggested representatives 'should consider bringing a lawsuit.'

Khanna states that while the Trump administration was forced to sign the Epstein transparency act, it is now actively resisting its implementation. He and Massie are considering 'inherent contempt or impeachment' against officials like Pam Bondi for non-compliance, believing they could garner Republican support in the House for such actions.

Congressman Luna in oversight talked about how upset she is with the DOJ. I believe we would get Republicans on an impeachment and that would be very significant if the Republican House voted to impeach Pam Bondi.

Despite the transparency act, the DOJ has released less than 1% of existing documents. Khanna specifically highlights the withholding of FBI 302 statements (witness memoranda) from survivors, which are believed to name 'rich and powerful men' who were co-conspirators in Epstein's crimes.

Of the documents they did deign to release, it's less than 1% of what actually exists. Mainly the F302s, the FBI statements that the survivors made which name these other men.

Khanna argues that the Epstein scandal, and the government's perceived protection of powerful individuals, significantly erodes public trust. He frames it as a symbol of a government that shields corrupt elites, making it difficult to gain support for other progressive policies.

The reason the Epstein act is front and center... is it's a symbol of a government that is protecting corrupt rich and powerful men and that has lost the trust of the American public.

Khanna directly challenges Dan Bongino, a former FBI official and current podcaster, to explain why critical Epstein files (like witness memoranda, emails, and pictures) are not being released, especially given Bongino's past advocacy for transparency.

I'd love to get on Dan Bongino's podcast or have him come on yours and ask him some simple questions. Why aren't they releasing the witness memorandum where the survivors named these rich and powerful men?