CinePals
CinePals
May 13, 2026

THE NEW MUTANTS (2020) Movie Reaction! | First Time Watch! | Anya Taylor-Joy | Maisie Williams

YouTube · xsl6aIdRNA8

Quick Read

CinePals hosts dissect 'The New Mutants,' an X-Men spin-off, praising its unique psychological horror tone but criticizing its muddled plot, weak X-Men ties, and inconsistent power explanations.
The film's unique psychological horror tone was a refreshing change for the X-Men universe.
Plot holes and an unclear antagonist severely hampered the narrative's impact.
The movie struggled to fully commit to its horror elements, likely due to a PG-13 rating.

Summary

Michael Boost and Brandon Sheiley react to 'The New Mutants,' noting its distinct shift towards psychological horror and a focus on teenagers grappling with their newly manifested, often destructive, mutant powers. They appreciate the film's attempt to explore the mental and emotional toll of mutation, drawing parallels to 'Gen V' and 'Stranger Things.' However, the hosts express significant disappointment with the film's execution, citing a confusing antagonist, the unexplained absence of staff in the facility, and a twist regarding the main character's power that felt unearned and illogical. They conclude that while the concept of a teen psychological thriller within the X-Men universe was promising, the film ultimately fumbled its potential due to a lack of clarity, inconsistent pacing, and a perceived reluctance to fully commit to its horror elements due to a PG-13 rating.
This reaction provides a critical perspective on 'The New Mutants,' highlighting common pitfalls in genre-blending superhero films and the challenges of integrating original ideas into established IPs. It offers insights into audience expectations for character development, plot coherence, and the effective use of horror elements within a PG-13 framework, valuable for filmmakers and fans alike.

Takeaways

  • The film explored the psychological impact of new mutant powers, a rare deep dive for the X-Men franchise.
  • A lack of supporting staff in the facility and an ambiguous antagonist made the plot feel incomplete.
  • The twist revealing the protagonist's power as the source of fear felt unearned due to insufficient narrative hints.

Insights

1Unique Tone, Flawed Execution

The hosts acknowledge 'The New Mutants' for its distinct psychological horror tone within the X-Men universe, focusing on teenagers dealing with their first, often traumatic, power manifestations. However, they criticize the film's execution, noting that while the idea was good, the delivery was lacking, especially in fully leaning into the horror aspects.

Michael Boost states, "This was a different tone for an X-Men movie. Very, very, very different tone. I appreciate the sort of diving into like what it's like being a teenager and dealing with like the first manifestation of your powers... I liked what they were trying to do." Brandon Sheiley adds, "The execution just really fumbled it."

2Muddled Antagonism and Narrative Gaps

A significant critique is the film's unclear antagonist, shifting between the Essex Corporation, the doctor, and ultimately the main character's power. The hosts also point out the unexplained lack of staff in the facility and vague timelines for how long the mutants had been institutionalized, which undermined the narrative's coherence.

Brandon Sheiley notes, "The antagonist was a little cloudy for me because because they first of all Essex or whatever. We never we never got past that to see anything about them. The bear ended up being the antagonist, but also, you know, the doctor was, but she went very quickly." Michael Boost adds, "There was no staff which feels really really weird. Like why is she the only one here?"

3Unearned Twist and Inconsistent Power Mechanics

The reveal that the main character, Danny, was the source of the fear manifestations felt uninspired and illogical to the hosts, who argue that the film provided insufficient hints. They also found Danny's power to be inconsistently portrayed, activating randomly without clear emotional triggers or explanations.

Michael Boost states, "It felt like the reveal of like, oh, it's all been Danny this entire time makes me feel stupid because I'm like, why?" Brandon Sheiley agrees, "It doesn't It doesn't. Yeah, exactly. Why?" Michael Boost later adds, "Danny's powers work because they were just kind of working randomly. Yeah, they just work randomly. There was no rhyme or reason."

4IP Integration Challenges: Originality vs. Established Franchises

The hosts discuss the broader Hollywood trend of integrating original ideas into established IPs rather than gambling on new, unproven concepts. They speculate that 'The New Mutants' might have been an original psychological thriller concept retrofitted into the X-Men universe, which could explain some of its narrative inconsistencies and weak X-Men connections.

Michael Boost ponders, "I'm wondering if someone somewhere at Disney or 20th Century Fox saw this story or at least the ideation of this story as its own original thing or had this idea and pitched it and then they were like, 'That's great. Let's make it X-Men cuz we haven't made an X-Men movie in a minute. Let's tie it in.'"

Notable Moments

The hosts identify a strong thematic parallel between 'The New Mutants' and 'Gen V,' noting both explore young super-powered individuals grappling with their abilities and the moral implications of their actions.

This comparison highlights a contemporary trend in superhero storytelling towards more mature, psychologically complex narratives, even if 'The New Mutants' predated 'Gen V' in release.

The hosts discuss the film's 'Slender Man' inspired antagonist, the 'Smiling Men,' as the most effective horror element, contrasting it with other less impactful scary moments.

This pinpoints a specific design choice that resonated as genuinely frightening, offering a lesson in effective horror creature design within a constrained rating.

Quotes

"

"This feels basically beat for beat sort of a watered down or I guess PG-13 Gen V to me because Gen V deals with a lot of like, you know, the soup kids figuring out their powers and the discussion of like what it's like to be a young, you know, teenager, 20-something in a world where superpowers exist and dealing with like the meaning of your powers and like the the what it means to kill or be a killer."

Michael Boost
"

"You never want to make your audience feel stupid. You never want to have the twist be so inobvious or so not leaned into that the audience is going, 'Wait, where where did that make any sense?'"

Michael Boost
"

"One or the other, man. You got to pick one or the other. Either it's going to be like a really good story with some light horror or the horror's got to be like pretty horrific."

Michael Boost

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes