Live Trials with Emily D. Baker

Live Trials with Emily D. Baker

Legal AnalysisCivil LitigationLegal StrategyMurder TrialsDomestic ViolenceKouri Richins TrialWitness TestimonyDigital ForensicsFentanyl overdoseAggravated MurderCriminal JusticeWitness credibilityJudicial ConductSentencingFinancial MotiveCriminal TrialCriminal LawCourt ProcedureCourtroom ProcedureForgeryLegal EthicsDefamation LawCriminal Justice SystemJury InstructionsInsurance FraudMurder InvestigationsAdmissibility of evidenceDiscovery DisputesDigital EvidenceAlex MurdaughSlayer StatuteCourt ProceedingsAttorney-client privilegeCourtroom StrategyHearsayCross-ExaminationForensic Evidencetrial strategyCross-examination strategyMurder trialConsciousness of GuiltKouri Richins Murder TrialChild EndangermentJudicial ProcessDepositionsLegal ProceedingsFinancial CrimesPolice MisconductVictim Impact StatementsEstate PlanningProbate LawJury TamperingFamily LawFinancial FraudPublic FiguresChild Custody DisputesTrue CrimeTrial ProcedureUtah LawAttempted MurderLegal ProcedureDrug TraffickingJudicial ProcedureCourtroom dynamicsJudicial DiscretionmurderJury SelectionDiscoveryDefamationMassachusetts LawNick ReinerAttorney EthicsMedia InfluenceVirginia LawJudicial MisconductLegal AppealsVictim ImpactCybersecurityData BreachAppellate ProcessAppealsMedia StrategyKouri Richins CaseCreator AdvocacyPlea BargainsDNA EvidenceMedia AccessPrivate InvestigationFreedom of SpeechFirst Amendment RightsJury DeliberationsClosing argumentsFentanyl poisoningReasonable doubtSpoilation of EvidenceEvidentiary RulingsEvidence AdmissibilityCredibilitylegal argumentsWalk the Dog Lettercriminal defenseprosecutionphone data analysisMurder investigationText messagesForensic accountingCourtroom dramaGoogle SearchesImmunity DealsCrime Scene InvestigationKouri RichinsWitness TamperingPre-trial motionsBloodstain Pattern AnalysisForensic SciencePremeditation
LIVE | Karen Read Discovery Fights over Colin Albert Deposition. Is the Judge over it?
Legal ProceedingsCivil LitigationJudicial Conduct

LIVE | Karen Read Discovery Fights over Colin Albert Deposition. Is the Judge over it?

The Karen Read wrongful death civil case is plagued by discovery disputes, prompting a frustrated judge to issue a flurry of strict orders and exposing alleged 'gamesmanship' around a key witness's deposition and digital evidence.

Explore Insights →
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Karen Read - Proctors' Procrastination Emergency Hearing Afternoon - Part 2
Civil LitigationDepositionsJudicial Conduct

LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Karen Read - Proctors' Procrastination Emergency Hearing Afternoon - Part 2

A chaotic civil court hearing sees a judge's unusual 'timeout' for attorneys, a denied deposition delay that still grants more time, and petty discovery disputes, all while the host dissects judicial temperament and legal gamesmanship.

Explore Insights →
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Karen Read - Proctors' Procrastination Emergency Hearing Morning - Part 1
Civil LitigationLegal StrategyCourt Procedure

LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Karen Read - Proctors' Procrastination Emergency Hearing Morning - Part 1

A Massachusetts civil court judge delays a critical deposition, citing insufficient information from a former trooper's attorney and expressing frustration with both legal teams' conduct and media appearances.

Explore Insights →
LIVE | It Ends with Settlement and Sarah Boone Appeals
Legal CasesCourt ProceedingsSentencing

LIVE | It Ends with Settlement and Sarah Boone Appeals

This episode provides critical updates on the Banfield sentencing, the 'It Ends With Us' settlement, and the unique background of the Sarah Boone appeal, highlighting strategic legal maneuvers and the host's approach to sensitive case coverage.

Explore Insights →
The Afroman Trial - Part 2 - Witnesses, Closing Arguments, Jury Instructions -- Verdict!
Defamation LawFalse Light Invasion of PrivacyFreedom of Speech

The Afroman Trial - Part 2 - Witnesses, Closing Arguments, Jury Instructions -- Verdict!

This episode dissects the chaotic Afroman defamation trial, highlighting the plaintiff's vague claims, the judge's highly unconventional courtroom management, and the defense's strategic use of First Amendment arguments, ultimately resulting in a unanimous verdict for Afroman.

Explore Insights →
The Afroman Trial - Part 1- Defamation and redefining the Streisand effect?
Defamation LawFreedom of SpeechPublic Figures

The Afroman Trial - Part 1- Defamation and redefining the Streisand effect?

Legal analyst Emily D. Baker dissects the Afroman defamation trial, revealing questionable judicial conduct, flawed plaintiff strategies, and the redefinition of public figure free speech through viral 'diss tracks'.

Explore Insights →
UT v. Kouri Richins - Trial Day 5 - Cross of Key Witness Carmen Lauber continues.
Kouri Richins TrialAggravated MurderFentanyl Overdose

UT v. Kouri Richins - Trial Day 5 - Cross of Key Witness Carmen Lauber continues.

Day 5 of the Kouri Richins trial saw chaotic cross-examinations, judicial frustration, and key witnesses offering conflicting accounts of drug transactions, culminating in a revealed motion for mistrial.

Explore Insights →

Want more on judicial conduct?

Explore deep-dive summaries and actionable takeaways from the best minds across different podcasts discussing this topic.

View All Judicial Conduct Episodes

Don't see the episode you're looking for?

We're constantly adding new episodes, but if you want to see a specific one from Live Trials with Emily D. Baker summarized, let us know!

Submit an Episode