Judge REJECTS DESPERATE Democrat STUNT As Trump Threatens To INVOKE Insurrection Act In Minneapolis!

A Minnesota judge declined to grant a restraining order that would have immediately stopped ICE from operating in the state, following a lawsuit brought by Democrats against the Department of Homeland Security. Legal experts noted that immigration law is federal, and states cannot dictate or commandeer federal enactment of the law, suggesting the lawsuit is unlikely to succeed long-term.

A Minnesota judge declining to block ICE operations in the state following a lawsuit brought against the Department of Homeland Security. Federal authorities now have until Monday to respond with a judge recognizing the importance of this case, saying these are quote grave and important matters. Katie Trasky, constitutional law attorney and former federal prosecutor, states, 'the law is settled on that point... immigration law is federal law. It's federal authority. states do not get to dictate or commandeer the federal uh enactment of the law.'

Former President Trump posted a threat to invoke the Insurrection Act if Minnesota politicians do not 'obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of ICE.' This act allows the president to deploy U.S. troops on U.S. soil for law enforcement activities, even against the objection of local leaders.

President Trump is now making a new and serious threat after protest in Minneapolis... saying that if Minnesota's politicians don't obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of ICE, I will institute the insurrection act. So that could lead to him deploying US troops on on US soil in that state.

The host strongly believes President Trump should invoke the Insurrection Act, arguing that Democrats' failure to control protests and protect ICE agents necessitates federal military intervention. He rejects the idea that ICE should de-escalate its operations, asserting that such a move would reward violence and set a dangerous precedent, emboldening future violent acts against law enforcement.

I personally think that the president should just go ahead and do this... If Democrats aren't going to put down these protests... then the federal government's going to have to do it because ICE agents are being attacked... There is no world where we're going to stop enforcing the law... You're rewarding violence... You have to demonstrate to them that not only does violence not work, but there could be fatal consequences to using violence.

Andrew McCabe, former Deputy Director of the FBI, stated there are no grounds to legitimize the use of the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis. He argued that the government could de-escalate tensions by altering ICE's operational approach, such as pulling back aggressive tactical responses, rather than deploying the military.

Andy, as a former deputy director of the FBI and acting director, do you see any grounds to legitimize the use of the insurrection act here? No, absolutely not... the government could very quickly deescalate the tension and the violence on the ground simply by conducting their business differently. Right? By pulling back some of these ICE officers, by bringing a less uh aggressive tactical approach.