The Don Lemon Show
The Don Lemon Show
May 28, 2026

Lemon LIVE at 5 | D.L. Hughley DESTROYS Donald Trump & MAGA!

YouTube · 7C8O5U_lGps

Quick Read

Don Lemon and D.L. Hughley critically examine recent political events, from Gavin Newsom's tax proposal to the Kevin Hart roast, arguing that current political actions reflect a dangerous, self-serving agenda and a decline in American standing.
Gavin Newsom's 100% tax on '1776 slush fund' recipients sparks political outrage and potential copycat legislation.
The Department of Justice's attempt to obtain journalist subscriber lists is framed as authoritarianism and intimidation.
The Kevin Hart roast ignited debate over racist jokes, the context of humor, and the differing accountability for comedians vs. politicians.

Summary

Don Lemon hosts D.L. Hughley and Reese Waters to discuss a range of current events, primarily focusing on criticisms of Donald Trump and the Republican party. Topics include Governor Gavin Newsom's proposed 100% tax on '1776 slush fund' recipients, the Department of Justice's attempt to obtain subscriber data from journalists, and the perceived decline of American influence in global conflicts due to loyalty-based appointments. The conversation also extends to the controversy surrounding the Kevin Hart roast, particularly the use of racist jokes and the differing standards applied to comedians versus politicians.
This episode offers a sharp critique of contemporary American politics and culture, highlighting concerns about authoritarianism, the erosion of democratic norms, and the impact of political rhetoric on social discourse. The discussion on the Kevin Hart roast also provides insight into evolving standards of comedy and the public's reaction to sensitive topics, particularly those involving race and tragedy.

Takeaways

  • Governor Gavin Newsom proposed a 100% tax on recipients of the '1776 slush fund' money, drawing sharp criticism from the Treasury Department.
  • The Department of Justice sought subscriber information (names, addresses, emails, phone numbers) from Don Lemon's show, which was denied by a judge.
  • D.L. Hughley and Don Lemon characterize Trump's actions, such as holding UFC fights at the White House and attempts to put himself on currency, as self-serving distractions from real American issues.
  • The U.S. underestimation of Iran is attributed to loyalty-based appointments in key defense and foreign policy roles, rather than expertise.
  • The hosts express dismay over Ken Paxton's electoral success in Texas despite numerous scandals, highlighting a perceived decline in political standards.
  • The Kevin Hart roast sparked controversy over racist jokes, particularly the George Floyd joke, with guests arguing about the context and impact of such humor.
  • Kevin Hart's reaction to controversial jokes at his roast was criticized as a 'biggest error' that necessitated subsequent damage control.

Insights

1Gavin Newsom's Aggressive Tax Strategy

California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a 100% state tax on Californians receiving money from the '1776 slush fund,' a move met with strong opposition from the Treasury Department, which called it 'stupid.' This action is seen by the host as a direct counter-attack by Democrats against perceived Republican overreach.

Gavin Newsome announced yesterday that he's going to 100% tax on anybody receiving that slush fund money that 1776 slush fund money. He's saying 100% tax. The guy who's in charge of the money, the Treasury Department, he has a few things to say about that. [...] 'Uh there's no cure for stupid.'

2DOJ's Attempt to Obtain Subscriber Data as Authoritarianism

The Department of Justice attempted to obtain a list of Don Lemon's YouTube subscribers' names, addresses, emails, and phone numbers. The host and D.L. Hughley interpret this as an outrageous act of authoritarianism and intimidation, drawing parallels to historical McCarthyism, especially as it occurred concurrently with efforts to remove January 6th defendants from similar lists.

The Department of Justice or the prosecutors in this case wanted a list of my subscribers names, addresses, and emails and phone numbers. [...] At the same time they're asking for your list, they're asking to remove the J6ers from those list. [...] I just think it is it's it's authoritarianism 101 and it's just kind of where we are right now.

3Trump's Actions as Self-Serving Distractions

D.L. Hughley and Don Lemon criticize Donald Trump's focus on activities like hosting UFC fights at the White House or attempting to put his face on a $250 bill. They frame these actions as petty, self-enriching distractions that do not address the everyday concerns of Americans, such as affordability, food, gas, and healthcare, comparing them to Roman games used to distract the populace.

I don't know how arresting journalists or or uh you know uh or attorney generals or you know having UFC fights at the White House or putting itself on a $250 bill or any of those things are have any impact on what is affecting Americans lives every day. [...] it's like the Romans used to have games at the coliseum as the distractive mechanism.

4Loyalty Over Expertise Leading to Foreign Policy Failures

The discussion attributes the U.S.'s perceived underestimation and struggles with Iran to the appointment of individuals based on loyalty rather than expertise in critical defense and foreign policy positions. This 'mediocrity' in leadership is seen as leading to strategic errors and a diminished global standing.

He put the the predicate was never on expertise um or even it was just loyalty him feely to him. If you look at what's happening in Iran um it is exceptional brown men who are fighting mediocre white men. [...] You have someone who has no experience as the secretary of defense. [...] You have people in those positions who um in their definition are DEI hires.

5The Controversy of the Kevin Hart Roast and Racial Jokes

Reese Waters and Don Lemon discuss the Kevin Hart roast, specifically addressing the use of racist jokes, particularly one referencing George Floyd. Waters argues that while racist jokes have a history at roasts, the context of who tells the joke and the ongoing societal suffering related to the subject matter (like George Floyd's death) makes certain jokes problematic and 'hacky.' They also note the disparity in the number of jokes targeting black people versus other groups.

I do think that the jokes were racist. I also think that racist jokes have established a long time home at roasts. [...] It's somebody's mentioning George Floyd in that vein who we know to be of a culture and of a of a strata of society where they view us this way where they have characterized George Floyd in those ways outside of a roast or outside of a comedy show period. That was the biggest issue that I had with it.

6Kevin Hart's Reaction to Roast Jokes as a Strategic Error

Reese Waters criticizes Kevin Hart's visible enjoyment and laughter during controversial jokes at his roast, particularly those about George Floyd. Waters suggests that Hart's reaction was a significant misstep, as it undermined the gravity of the jokes and necessitated subsequent public apologies and explanations, which could have been avoided with a more neutral or serious demeanor.

I think Kevin Hart's biggest error was how he reacted when some of those jokes were told. That was his biggest error because you can't be you can't be smiling and laughing and kikiing when they telling these kinds of jokes. This is how this what's going to happen. You're going to spend the next couple of weeks up at the Breakfast Club going to see going to see Shannon Sharp, going to see you, whatever the case may be, to try and put a band-aid on it when you could have just did a 4 second a and now you absolve.

Bottom Line

Old black people are uniquely unshocked by current authoritarian trends and political regression, possessing a historical point of reference for such societal shifts.

So What?

This perspective suggests a deep-seated historical awareness within certain communities regarding cycles of oppression and political manipulation, implying that current events are not unprecedented but rather a recurrence of past patterns.

Impact

Understanding this historical perspective can inform strategies for resilience and resistance, drawing on lessons from past struggles to navigate present challenges and avoid complacency.

Comedians are held to a higher moral and ethical standard for their jokes than politicians are for their public statements and actions.

So What?

This disparity highlights a societal paradox where entertainment figures face greater scrutiny for potentially offensive content than political leaders do for policies or rhetoric that have tangible, negative impacts on people's lives.

Impact

This observation can be used to spark conversations about media literacy, accountability in public discourse, and the double standards applied to different public figures, potentially shifting focus back to the real-world consequences of political leadership.

The 'mental gymnastics' required to support certain political figures (e.g., MAGA supporters) involves ignoring the direct ramifications of their choices on others, particularly regarding 'family values' and moral conduct.

So What?

This points to a significant disconnect between stated values and political allegiance, suggesting that tribalism or other factors override consistent ethical application in political decision-making.

Impact

Analyzing this disconnect can help in understanding political polarization and developing communication strategies that bridge value gaps rather than exacerbating them, by directly confronting the consequences of actions rather than abstract rhetoric.

Lessons

  • Critically evaluate political leaders' actions and appointments based on expertise and impact on daily life, rather than solely on loyalty or rhetoric.
  • Recognize and challenge attempts at political intimidation, such as requests for private subscriber data, as potential signs of authoritarianism.
  • Engage in informed discussions about the role of comedy in society, considering the context, intent, and impact of jokes, especially those touching on sensitive social issues.

Notable Moments

D.L. Hughley compares Trump's White House activities to a 'trailer park' and Roman games, serving as distractions from real issues.

This vivid comparison underscores the guest's view that the administration prioritizes spectacle and personal gain over substantive governance, framing political events as deliberate diversions.

The hosts and guests discuss the shocking electoral success of Ken Paxton in Texas despite a lengthy rap sheet of alleged crimes and scandals.

This highlights a perceived decline in political accountability and the increasing tolerance for controversial figures in certain political landscapes, raising questions about voter priorities and the state of political ethics.

Quotes

"

"I think he knows his time is running out and like any wounded animal, it fights that much harder to to to stay alive. And I think that's what he's doing right now. He's he's stripping his country for parts. He's uh he's going after his enemies and he's enriching himself."

D.L. Hughley
"

"I would think you would want to win one fight before you started another one. Like you can't have a ultimate fighting championship when you when when a middle power fought you to a standstill."

D.L. Hughley
"

"Donald Trump is not acting new. Donald For Donald Trump, this is retro. There are more presidents who've assaulted women, who've been accused of who who who had sex with underage. there more presidents like that than haven't been."

D.L. Hughley
"

"Kevin Hart's biggest error was how he reacted when some of those jokes were told."

Reese Waters

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes