Nima R. Alkhorshid: Iran LAUNCHES Immediate Retaliation: Explosions Rock Bahrain After US Strikes
YouTube · 8-_HAsWoFws
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖A reported US Apache helicopter hit in the Strait of Hormuz was deemed suspicious and unconfirmed by the host, serving as a 'fake' pretext for US strikes.
- ❖The US launched three waves of attacks on Iranian islands (Siri, Qeshm) and the port of Jask, targeting infrastructure like telecommunication towers and water tanks.
- ❖Iran's IRGC claimed immediate retaliation, striking US Fifth Fleet naval base in Bahrain and the Muafaq Salti airbase in Jordan, as well as targets in Kuwait.
- ❖The host asserts that the Trump administration's actions are influenced by Israeli agenda and personal financial gain, rather than genuine US national interest.
- ❖The attacks have reportedly unified Iranian society and strengthened the 'axis of resistance' (Iran, Yemen, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine).
- ❖Iran has asserted permanent control over the Strait of Hormuz, challenging international navigation norms.
- ❖GCC countries are depicted as 'delusional' and strategically vulnerable, caught between the escalating conflict and unable to exert influence on the US or Israel.
- ❖Israel's military, psychological, economic, and geopolitical standing is seen as significantly weakened since the war began, with time favoring the 'axis of resistance'.
Insights
1Alleged 'Fake' Pretext for US Strikes on Iran
The host contends that the reported US Apache helicopter hit in the Strait of Hormuz by an Iranian Shahed 136 drone was a fabricated or unconfirmed incident. He points to the lack of footage, wreckage, or injured pilots, and Donald Trump's contradictory statements, suggesting it was a 'suspicious' and 'unbelievable' story used to justify subsequent US attacks on Iran.
Donald Trump posted on Truth Social about an attack on a helicopter, then later downplayed it. No footage or confirmation from Iranian government. Larry Johnson on RT questioned the survivability of pilots if hit. Host states, 'the whole case is so fake.'
2US Strikes on Iranian Islands and Port
Following the alleged helicopter incident, the US launched three waves of attacks using fighter jets and drones on Iranian targets, specifically hitting Siri Island (telecommunications tower, two water tanks), Qeshm Island, and the port of Jask. Iranian IRGC reported intercepting some drones but confirmed hits by fighter jets.
Reports from Iran indicated US hit a telecommunications tower and two water tanks on Siri Island. Attacks also occurred on Qeshm Island and Bandar Jask. IRGC confirmed intercepting at least two drones, but fighter jets hit targets.
3Iran's Immediate Retaliation Against US Bases
In direct response to US strikes, Iran's IRGC claimed to have launched missiles and drones, hitting US military targets in Bahrain (Fifth Fleet naval base), Jordan (Muafaq Salti airbase, including F-35 hangars and a command control center), and Kuwait. Reports from Bahrain indicated 'at least a dozen huge explosions'.
IRGC stated they attacked Bahrain and the Fifth Fleet at a.m. Footage showed explosions at the American naval base in Bahrain. IRGC reported targeting four important targets at Muafaq Salti airbase in Jordan, including F-35 hangars and a command center. Fars News reported at least 21 targets hit by a combination of missiles and drones.
4US Actions as Proxy for Israeli Inability
The host argues that the US entered the conflict because Israel was incapable of effectively attacking Iran on its own. He states that Israel could not hit desired targets without US assistance, making the US a proxy for Israeli military objectives in the region.
Host states, 'Why does the United States need to attack Iran? Because Israel couldn't attack Iran the way it wants... They're incapable of doing this without the United States. That's why the United States entered the game.' He also says, 'The United States is the proxy of Israel. We have to accept that.'
5Unification of 'Axis of Resistance' and Iranian Society
The attacks by the US have inadvertently strengthened internal unity within Iran and solidified the 'axis of resistance' (Iran, Yemenis, Iraqi resistance, Lebanon, Palestine). The host notes that ordinary Iranians, initially fearful of attack, are now unified in supporting the government and demanding US withdrawal from the region.
Host states, 'the attacks on Iranians unified all the society together with the government.' He adds, 'Iran has found its way to defend itself. And right now, they're expanding that umbrella of resistance, that umbrella of protecting not only Iran, it's going to be the whole axis of resistance.'
6Iran's Permanent Control Over Strait of Hormuz
The host declares that the Strait of Hormuz is now permanently under Iranian control, asserting that the US presence there is illegitimate under international law. He highlights Iran's leverage, citing Sweden's previous sanctions on medicine for Iran and now 'begging' to use the Strait.
Host states, 'The Strait of Hormuz is part of the Iranian and Omani territory and the United States is there to patrol. I don't know what is the main point of the United States being there.' Later, 'This Strait is gone. It's going to be under the control of Iranian government forever.' He uses the example of Sweden's sanctions on medicine and subsequent plea to use the Strait.
Bottom Line
GCC countries are in a precarious and 'delusional' position, unable to influence US or Israeli actions despite their financial power and direct exposure to regional conflict, leading to a lack of public statements or effective defense.
This suggests a significant erosion of sovereignty and strategic agency among Gulf states, making them vulnerable pawns in a larger geopolitical struggle. Their silence and inaction could further destabilize the region and potentially lead to internal unrest as public opinion shifts.
This vulnerability could create opportunities for alternative regional powers or alliances to emerge, or for internal political shifts within GCC countries as populations seek more effective leadership and defense strategies independent of US influence.
The escalating conflict is fostering unprecedented unity among Shia and Sunni populations in West Asia, dissolving historical sectarian divisions that Israel and Western powers allegedly exploited.
This emerging unity fundamentally undermines long-standing geopolitical strategies that relied on sectarian divides to control the region. It could lead to a more cohesive and formidable 'axis of resistance' that transcends religious lines, posing a greater challenge to US and Israeli interests.
A unified West Asia, if it materializes, could exert greater collective bargaining power on the global stage, reshape regional trade and security architectures, and potentially lead to new forms of governance or alliances that prioritize regional autonomy over external influence.
Israel's strategic position (militarily, psychologically, economically, geopolitically) is collapsing, and its leadership, particularly Netanyahu, is seen as the 'architect of its collapse' by pursuing land grabs while its own northern territories become buffer zones.
This perspective suggests that Israel's aggressive expansionist policies are backfiring, leading to self-inflicted strategic damage and a loss of regional standing. It implies that Israel's long-term viability is increasingly in question without sustained external support, particularly from the US.
The perceived decline of Israel's strategic strength could embolden its adversaries and lead to more direct and sustained challenges to its borders and existence. It also suggests that the current Israeli leadership's approach is unsustainable and may lead to internal political upheaval or a forced re-evaluation of its regional strategy.
Key Concepts
Proxy War Dynamics
The host frames the US involvement in direct conflict with Iran as a proxy for Israel's strategic objectives, arguing that Israel's inability to achieve its goals independently necessitates US intervention, thereby diminishing the US's superpower status to that of a regional proxy.
Tit-for-Tat Escalation
The conflict is characterized by a rapid and direct exchange of attacks and retaliations, where each side responds to perceived aggression with immediate counter-strikes, leading to a continuous cycle of escalation rather than de-escalation or negotiation.
Strategic Unification Through Adversity
The external attacks on Iran and its allies are presented as a catalyst for internal unity within Iran and stronger cohesion among the 'axis of resistance' (Iran, Yemen, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine), transforming disparate entities into a more unified and psychologically prepared front against common adversaries.
Lessons
- Monitor the Strait of Hormuz for increased Iranian control and its potential impact on global oil shipping and prices, as Iran has declared permanent control.
- Re-evaluate the stability of US military bases in the Gulf region (Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait) given Iran's demonstrated capability and willingness to retaliate directly against them.
- Analyze the evolving unity within the 'axis of resistance' and across West Asian populations (Shia/Sunni) as a significant geopolitical shift, potentially leading to a more formidable and unified regional bloc.
Notable Moments
Donald Trump's contradictory statements regarding the alleged US helicopter attack, initially calling for response then downplaying it while simultaneously discussing a deal with Iran.
This highlights the host's argument that Trump's administration is disingenuous, using 'fake' pretexts for conflict while attempting to manipulate public perception and market stability, serving an agenda beyond stated US interests.
IRGC's claim of hitting 21 targets across US bases in Jordan, Bahrain, and Kuwait in retaliation for US strikes on Iran.
This demonstrates Iran's asserted capability and willingness for immediate, widespread, and direct retaliation against US assets in the region, signaling a dangerous escalation and a shift in the balance of power.
The host's observation that the US is running out of ammunition and initiated a ceasefire due to resource depletion, despite Iran's continued capability to fight.
This suggests a potential strategic weakness in US military readiness or sustainability in prolonged regional conflicts, contrasting with Iran's perceived endurance and readiness for a 'full-scale war'.
Quotes
"The whole story about the you know, the helicopter was so suspicious and many what was the point and there is no footage of that helicopter."
"The United States is the proxy of Israel. We have to accept that."
"This Strait is gone. It's going to be under the control of Iranian government forever."
"Benjamin Netanyahu doesn't understand. He Nobody knows what does this want. It's all about grabbing land from other countries."
"He's the main designer of the collapse of Israel. He did that to Israel."
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes

Patrick Henningsen: Hezbollah JUST Fired Back at Israel - Iran Vows to “Crush” All Attacks
"Patrick Henningsen argues that the US and Israel initiated an illegal war against Iran, driven by Trump's incompetence and Israeli influence, leading to an inevitable escalation with severe global economic repercussions."

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."

BREAKING: Protests ERUPT In Iran Over IRGC Surrendering To Trump - Infighting Clashes In Tehran
"Iran is experiencing severe internal infighting and protests as hardline IRGC elements clash with government figures over a perceived 'surrender' to the US, while mainstream Western media misrepresents the situation."

Alex Krainer: US STRIKES Iran – Iran RETALIATES Against Kuwait, Bahrain & Jordan!
"Amidst escalating US-Iran conflict and Iranian retaliation against regional US allies, this episode argues that US foreign policy is deeply controlled by an 'Anglo-Zionist conspiracy' led by the Rothschild banking dynasty, prioritizing Israeli interests over American ones."