Interviews 02
Interviews 02
March 28, 2026

Seyed M. Marandi: Yemen Enters the War - US-Israeli Strikes on Energy Sites Spark IRAN’S RETALIATION

Quick Read

Professor Seyed M. Marandi asserts that US-Israeli strikes on Iranian energy and nuclear facilities have triggered severe Iranian retaliation against Gulf states and Israel, escalating the conflict towards a global energy crisis and the potential collapse of US-allied regimes.
Iran is actively striking key infrastructure in Israel and five Gulf states, viewing them as complicit in the war.
The conflict risks the 'complete destruction' of Persian Gulf oil/gas assets, leading to a global energy crisis.
Iran's 'axis of resistance' (Hezbollah, Yemen, Iraq) is underestimated and prepared for sustained escalation.

Summary

Professor Seyed M. Marandi discusses the severe escalation of conflict following alleged US-Israeli strikes on Iranian energy and nuclear facilities. He states that Iran has initiated a 'twofold, threefold, four-fold' retaliation against key infrastructure in occupied Palestine and five Persian Gulf regimes (Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait), which he claims are complicit in funding and facilitating the war. Marandi argues that Iran views US promises as worthless and will not accept a ceasefire without reparations, respect for its sovereignty, and security for its regional allies. He predicts the complete destruction of oil and gas assets across the Persian Gulf if the conflict continues, leading to a global economic catastrophe. Marandi also highlights the underestimated capabilities of Iran and its 'axis of resistance' allies (Hezbollah, Yemen, Iraqi resistance), asserting their resilience and eventual victory against what he labels the 'Epstein class' and 'satanic' US forces. He concludes that Iran will ultimately control the Strait of Hormuz to extract reparations from complicit Gulf states.
This analysis provides a stark, highly critical perspective on the escalating Middle East conflict, framed from an Iranian viewpoint. It suggests that the conflict is not merely regional but has global economic implications, particularly for energy markets, and could fundamentally reshape geopolitical alliances and power dynamics in the Persian Gulf. The guest's predictions of widespread destruction and the collapse of US-allied regimes, if realized, would have profound and lasting effects on international relations and global stability.

Takeaways

  • US-Israeli strikes on Iranian energy and nuclear facilities have prompted severe Iranian retaliation against key infrastructure in Israel and five Persian Gulf states.
  • Iran views Gulf states like the Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar as complicit in the war due to their funding and provision of airspace/bases to the US.
  • Professor Marandi asserts that Iran will not accept a ceasefire without demanding reparations from complicit Arab regimes and ensuring respect for its sovereignty and its allies' security.
  • The guest predicts that continued escalation will lead to the 'complete destruction' of oil and gas assets across the Persian Gulf, causing a global energy crisis.
  • The 'axis of resistance' (Hezbollah, Yemen, Iraqi resistance) is portrayed as highly capable and underestimated by Western powers, prepared for significant escalation.
  • Marandi claims the US and Israel deliberately targeted a girls' elementary school on day one of the war, calling it a 'double tap attack' and labeling US forces 'satanic'.
  • Iran plans to control the Strait of Hormuz and impose fees on passing ships to collect reparations from Gulf states involved in the conflict.
  • The guest suggests that the only way for Gulf states to avoid destruction is to expel US forces and cease antagonizing Iran from their territory.

Insights

1Iran's Retaliation Strategy and Regional Complicity

Following alleged US-Israeli strikes on Iranian energy and nuclear facilities, Iran has initiated a severe, multi-front retaliation. Professor Marandi states Iran is striking key infrastructure in 'occupied Palestine' and five Persian Gulf regimes: the Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait. He argues these regimes are 'utterly complicit' by providing funding, airspace, land, bases, and port access, without which the US cannot wage war. Iran views their claims of neutrality as insulting.

Marandi cites Iran's prior retaliation against Qatar's gas installations and Saudi/Emirati oil assets after an Israeli strike on the South Pars gas field. He states that Iran's response will be 'twofold, threefold, four-fold' compared to what it receives.

2Rejection of Ceasefire and Demand for New Regional Conditions

Iran rejects any ceasefire that does not fundamentally alter the regional power dynamics and ensure its long-term security. The guest argues that past agreements (like the 2015 nuclear deal) were broken by the US, and current US promises are 'worthless.' Iran's demands include reparations from complicit Arab states, respect for its sovereignty, and security for its regional allies. The goal is to prevent future attacks and end the 'cycle of war, ceasefire, war.'

Marandi references Trump tearing up the nuclear deal and conspiring during subsequent negotiations. He states Iran will 'demand reparations and we will get those reparations' from Arab family dictatorships.

3Predicted Global Economic Catastrophe via Energy Destruction

Professor Marandi warns that continued escalation by Israel and the US will lead to the 'complete destruction of oil and gas assets across the Persian Gulf.' This, he asserts, would result in a global energy crisis, with no gas, no oil, and no tankers, sacrificing the entire global economy. He attributes this to Israel's disregard for global economic interests and Trump's 'obedience to the Zionists.'

Marandi states, 'If this continues, Iran will continue and ultimately if we go down this road, if the Israelis push, that will lead to the complete destruction of oil and gas assets across the Persian Gulf.'

4Underestimated Resilience and Capabilities of the 'Axis of Resistance'

The guest contends that Western powers consistently underestimate Iran's resilience and the capabilities of its 'axis of resistance' allies (Hezbollah, Yemen, Iraqi resistance). He highlights their indigenous technological development, 'missile cities,' and 'drone cities,' contrasting this with the reliance of Gulf states on US weapons. He claims Hezbollah is 'extraordinarily well' prepared, Yemen defeated the US in a prior war and is now stronger, and Iraqi resistance is 'just beginning' its escalation.

Marandi mentions Western predictions that Iran would collapse in two days or run out of missiles and drones, which he says proved false. He states, 'Yemen, which defeated the United States in another war a year ago, they are much more prepared today for war than even back then.'

5Iran's Control of the Strait of Hormuz for Reparations

Post-conflict, Iran intends to assert control over the Strait of Hormuz to extract reparations from Gulf states deemed complicit in the war. The guest explains that Iran will likely demand a fee for every ship passing through, justifying it as payment for the 'murder and death and destruction' caused by countries that waged war against Iran.

Marandi states, 'Iran will control the trade of hormones and through this control they will get their reparations.' He adds, 'They will probably demand a fee from my understanding a fee for every ship that passes.'

Bottom Line

The guest claims the US and Israel deliberately targeted a girls' elementary school on the first day of the war against Iran, calling it a 'double tap attack' and asserting such initial targets are 'well vetted' and not accidental.

So What?

This specific accusation suggests a perceived strategy of psychological warfare and collective punishment against the Iranian populace, aiming to break morale by targeting civilian infrastructure and children. If true, it would indicate a severe breach of international law and a highly aggressive posture.

Impact

Investigate claims of specific civilian targeting in early stages of conflicts, particularly 'double tap attacks,' to understand the psychological and strategic intent behind such operations and their impact on civilian populations.

Professor Marandi suggests that the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is a 'shameless proxy' and 'agent of the United States,' making 'disgraceful' statements about destroying Iran's nuclear program with nukes.

So What?

This reflects a deep distrust of international bodies and their leadership, viewing them as extensions of US/Western influence rather than neutral arbiters. It implies that Iran perceives international pressure regarding its nuclear program as politically motivated rather than genuinely concerned with non-proliferation.

Impact

Analyze the perceived politicization of international organizations by non-Western states and the implications for their legitimacy and effectiveness in global governance, especially in sensitive areas like nuclear oversight.

The guest states that the 'Epstein class' dominates the West and influences Gulf regimes, implying a shadowy, morally corrupt elite orchestrating global conflicts.

So What?

This framing suggests a conspiratorial worldview where major geopolitical events are driven by a hidden, malevolent force rather than conventional state interests or ideologies. It serves to delegitimize adversaries by associating them with extreme moral depravity.

Impact

Examine how 'conspiracy theories' or alternative narratives like the 'Epstein class' are used in geopolitical discourse to explain complex events, mobilize support, and delegitimize opponents, and their impact on public perception and policy.

Lessons

  • Monitor the Strait of Hormuz for any changes in shipping regulations or fees imposed by Iran, as this is a stated objective for reparations.
  • Assess the resilience and actual capabilities of Iran's 'axis of resistance' allies (Hezbollah, Yemen, Iraqi resistance) independently, given the guest's claim of consistent underestimation by Western powers.
  • Analyze the potential for a global energy crisis stemming from the destruction of Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure, considering the guest's prediction of irreversible damage and long-term depression.

Notable Moments

Professor Marandi asserts that the US and Israel targeted a girls' elementary school on day one of the war, calling it a 'double tap attack' and claiming it was 'very well planned.'

This is a highly specific and grave accusation of war crimes, suggesting a deliberate strategy to terrorize the population. It highlights the depth of animosity and the guest's interpretation of adversary tactics.

The guest labels the US armed forces as a 'satanic force' and US/Israeli pilots as 'sinister monsters,' attributing their actions to the 'Epstein class.'

This demonstrates the extreme rhetoric and moral condemnation used by the guest to describe adversaries, framing the conflict in stark, almost apocalyptic terms. It reflects a deeply ideological and dehumanizing perspective.

Marandi claims that JD Vance and Tulsi Gabbard are 'cowards' who 'know the truth' about Iran, Zionism, and genocide but are 'too ambitious' to speak out, contrasting them with Joe Kent who 'showed some integrity' by resigning.

This offers a specific, critical assessment of US political figures from an external, adversarial perspective, suggesting that political ambition overrides moral conviction in Washington regarding Middle East policy.

Quotes

"

"If they carry out such strikes, the retaliation will be very severe. And they have stated that they will now strike key infrastructure in occupied Palestine as well as the key infrastructure in the five regimes in the Persian Gulf."

Seyed M. Marandi
"

"If this continues, Iran will continue and ultimately if we go down this road, if the Israelis push, that will lead to the complete destruction of oil and gas assets across the Persian Gulf."

Seyed M. Marandi
"

"Trump's signature, his promises mean absolutely nothing. They're worthless. His words are worth nothing."

Seyed M. Marandi
"

"The US armed forces is a satanic force. It's a deeply satanic force."

Seyed M. Marandi
"

"Iran will control the trade of hormones and through this control they will get their reparations."

Seyed M. Marandi

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

Col. Jacques Baud: Middle East on Fire — Is This the Start of Something Bigger?
Interviews 02Mar 2, 2026

Col. Jacques Baud: Middle East on Fire — Is This the Start of Something Bigger?

"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the escalating conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran, arguing that Western misunderstanding of Iranian culture and strategic duplicity have forced Iran into a position of necessary escalation, ultimately degrading the West's own strategic posture."

US-Iran relationsGeopoliticsDiplomacy+1
Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like
Interviews 02Mar 30, 2026

Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like

"Colonel Jacques Baud dissects the strategic futility of a US ground invasion of Iran, arguing that current troop levels are insufficient and such an action would backfire, exposing US allies and potentially leading to Iran's nuclearization."

GeopoliticsMilitary StrategyUS Foreign Policy+2
PBS News Hour full episode, March 24, 2026
PBS NewsHourMar 24, 2026

PBS News Hour full episode, March 24, 2026

"A multi-front global conflict, domestic policy battles, and environmental crises are reshaping geopolitics, urban landscapes, and economic stability, demanding urgent reevaluation of policy and infrastructure."

GeopoliticsAviation SafetyEconomic Policy+2
TRUMP PANICS AS FINANCIAL APOCALYPSE HITS; TRILLIONS LOST; TEHRAN IN ‘NUCLEAR WINTER’ & CHAOS ERUPTS
The Kyle Kulinski ShowMar 9, 2026

TRUMP PANICS AS FINANCIAL APOCALYPSE HITS; TRILLIONS LOST; TEHRAN IN ‘NUCLEAR WINTER’ & CHAOS ERUPTS

"The host details a catastrophic global economic and humanitarian crisis stemming from the US-Israel war on Iran, framing Trump as an incompetent, lying leader whose actions are escalating the conflict and destroying the world."

Iran WarUS-Israel RelationsEconomic Impact+1