Interviews 02
Interviews 02
June 12, 2026

Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar: Iran Warns Israel – Leave Occupied Territories or Final Deal Is DEAD

YouTube · DbJjR6YmGUY

Quick Read

Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar argues that Iran's non-negotiable demands for Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon and US disengagement from Israeli military support are the critical roadblocks to any lasting deal, exposing the US's compromised position.
Iran demands Israel's full withdrawal from Lebanon, control over Strait of Hormuz, and asset release.
US negotiation efforts are undermined by inexperienced diplomats and an inability to control Israel.
Israel is militarily dependent on the US and cannot defeat regional adversaries alone.

Summary

Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar discusses the stalled negotiations between the US and Iran, highlighting Iran's firm demands: Israel's complete withdrawal from Lebanon, shared control and taxation of the Strait of Hormuz, and the immediate release of frozen assets. He criticizes the US negotiation team as 'amateurs' and emphasizes that Iran will not accept a mere 'memorandum of understanding' without tangible proof of US commitment, particularly regarding its ability to control Israel's military actions. Aguilar asserts that Israel cannot defeat Hezbollah or Hamas without extensive US military support, and the US's unwillingness to cut ties with Israel is the primary obstacle to a deal, suggesting the US is compromised.
This analysis provides a critical, expert perspective on the intractable nature of US-Iran negotiations, revealing how the US's relationship with Israel complicates its foreign policy objectives and prolongs regional conflicts. It underscores the strategic vulnerabilities of Israel's defense systems and military capabilities without US backing, offering a stark assessment of the geopolitical leverage at play.

Takeaways

  • Iranian foreign minister outlined key demands: Israel's total withdrawal from Lebanon, joint Iran-Oman control of the Strait of Hormuz with administrative fees, and immediate release of frozen assets upon memorandum signing.
  • The US negotiation team, including Jared Kushner, Steve Witoff, and JD Vance, is perceived as inexperienced and unprepared compared to seasoned Iranian diplomats.
  • Iran's position on Lebanon and Gaza is non-negotiable; they will not accept an MOU without concrete US action to curb Israeli aggression.
  • Israel's defense systems (Iron Dome, David Sling) are effective against rockets but not designed for advanced ballistic or hypersonic missiles, and are severely degraded.
  • The US maintains a significant military presence in the region, including three carrier strike groups and nuclear submarines, indicating no de-escalation.
  • The host and guest express skepticism about any 'deal' announced by Donald Trump, citing 39 previous unfulfilled announcements.

Insights

1Iran's Non-Negotiable Demands for a Final Deal

Iran has presented clear, non-negotiable conditions for any final agreement. These include Israel's complete withdrawal from Lebanon, joint control and taxation (via administrative/environmental fees) of the Strait of Hormuz with Oman, and the immediate release of all Iranian frozen assets upon signing a memorandum.

The host details the Iranian foreign minister's interview outlining these 3 points. 'If they do something they have Israel must withdraw totally from Lebanon... the Strait of Hormuz would be will be under the control of Iran and Oman... Once we sign the memorandum, they have to release the Iranian frozen assets.'

2US Negotiation Weakness and Inexperience

The US negotiation strategy is severely hampered by the inexperience of its representatives (Jared Kushner, Steve Witoff, JD Vance) who lack diplomatic expertise. This contrasts sharply with Iran's seasoned diplomats, like their foreign minister who was involved in the JCPOA, leading to an imbalanced negotiation dynamic.

The host states, 'they are dealing with Jared Kushner, Steve Wkov, then JD Vance. These people don't know what is that what is the issue and they they have no understanding of diplomacy.' Lt. Col. Aguilar adds, 'We are sending amateurs to deal with doctors.'

3Israel's Military Dependence on US Support

Israel cannot militarily defeat Hezbollah or Hamas without the extensive logistical, supply, reconnaissance, intelligence, and fuel support from the United States. Any attempt by Israel to fight alone would be incredibly costly and likely unsuccessful, forcing them to give up other territories.

Lt. Col. Aguilar states, 'Israel cannot defeat Hezbollah. Can't. Not without the US.' He elaborates, 'You can't bomb Hezbollah out of existence... if you want to go in on the ground, they're going to beat you.' He also notes, 'Israel can't even defeat Hamas.'

4The US is Compromised on Israel

Donald Trump possesses the leverage to end the conflict by withdrawing US military support from Israel (missiles, fuel, intelligence). His unwillingness to use this leverage suggests he is 'compromised' by the relationship with Israel, preventing him from making decisions that align with US interests.

Lt. Col. Aguilar asserts, 'Donald Trump absolutely has that leverage. There's no question.' He then asks, 'So why isn't he using it?... The only reason Donald Trump won't exercise the leverage that he has is because he's compromised by what? I mean, we can we can all speculate. I don't know. But he's compromised by something.'

5Critique of Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs)

Memorandums of Understanding are dismissed as ineffective and a 'coward's way out' of firm negotiations. Without tangible action and verifiable commitment, especially regarding Israel's actions, an MOU is meaningless and will not satisfy Iran's demands for proof.

Lt. Col. Aguilar states, 'memorandums of understanding are are the coward's way out of firm negotiation.' He compares it to Japan's formal declaration of surrender in WWII, noting, 'Do you think we would have taken a memorandum of understanding from the Empire of Japan to end World War II? No. Neither should Iran.'

Bottom Line

The US military's current posture, with multiple carrier strike groups and nuclear submarines in the region, contradicts any narrative of de-escalation or an impending peace deal.

So What?

This suggests that despite diplomatic rhetoric, the US is prepared for continued conflict, or at least maintaining a strong deterrent, rather than genuinely winding down tensions.

Impact

Analysts should scrutinize military deployments as a more reliable indicator of US intentions than political statements regarding negotiations.

Israel's air defense systems (Iron Dome, David Sling) are critically degraded and ill-equipped to handle advanced, high-volume missile attacks from adversaries like Iran, relying heavily on US defensive aid.

So What?

This vulnerability means that without continuous and robust US support, Israel faces significant defensive challenges, potentially increasing its reliance on offensive preemption or escalating conflicts.

Impact

Defense contractors specializing in advanced anti-ballistic and anti-hypersonic missile systems could find a critical market in Israel, assuming US political will allows for such sales or joint development, or in other nations facing similar threats.

Lessons

  • Scrutinize official statements about 'deals' or 'agreements' with Iran, especially from the Trump administration, against concrete actions and verifiable changes in military posture or Israeli behavior.
  • Recognize the critical role of diplomatic experience in international negotiations; the effectiveness of a negotiation team can significantly impact outcomes.
  • Understand that the US-Israel relationship is a central, complicating factor in Middle East geopolitics, potentially limiting US flexibility and leverage in other regional conflicts.

Notable Moments

The host highlights the rapid shifts in 'deal' announcements, from 'deal is done' to 'still some concerns' within a single day, illustrating the volatility and lack of substance in public statements.

This rapid change underscores the rhetorical nature of these announcements, suggesting they are more about political posturing than genuine diplomatic progress, and contribute to public confusion and distrust.

Lt. Col. Aguilar uses the analogy of a 'Chinese finger trap' to describe Donald Trump's predicament, where pulling harder (insisting on terms) only tightens the trap, and giving a little (compromising) is necessary to escape.

This vivid analogy effectively illustrates the strategic bind the US finds itself in, caught between its own rigid demands and Iran's, with Israel acting as an additional constraint preventing compromise.

Quotes

"

"When a negotiation started Iran had a a bottom line and other points and the United States has had a bottom line and other points. When you come into a negotiation, a negotiation is looking for where are those mutual interests, where are those points of cooperation, what are our bottom lines, not will will not, must not, will or will, you know, whatever that case may be."

Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar
"

"The only thing close counts for is in is in horseshoes and hand grenades. Close doesn't matter. Where's the deal? Show me the money. Show me the deal."

Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar
"

"The United States must cut ties and make it clear that they are cutting ties in military support to Israel. Military and I mean logistics, I mean supply, I mean reconnaissance, I mean intelligence, I mean fuel, all those things. cutting it completely and must make it clear."

Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar
"

"Memorandums of understanding are are the coward's way out of firm negotiation."

Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar
"

"The only reason Donald Trump won't exercise the leverage that he has is because he's compromised by what? I mean, we can we can all speculate. I don't know. But he's compromised by something. And it has to do with money and whatever's in the Epstein files."

Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes

Iran Deal Skepticism. Whoopi Vs Vance. Potomac Park Invasion. Racist Hurls Slurs At Black Boy.
Roland Martin UnfilteredJun 17, 2026

Iran Deal Skepticism. Whoopi Vs Vance. Potomac Park Invasion. Racist Hurls Slurs At Black Boy.

"This episode dissects multiple instances of alleged anti-Black policies and racial injustice, from the Trump administration's legal challenges to reparations and the Iran deal, to police brutality and the erasure of Black history."

ReparationsIran Nuclear DealPolitical Commentary+2
Alex Krainer: US STRIKES Iran – Iran RETALIATES Against Kuwait, Bahrain & Jordan!
Interviews 02Jun 11, 2026

Alex Krainer: US STRIKES Iran – Iran RETALIATES Against Kuwait, Bahrain & Jordan!

"Amidst escalating US-Iran conflict and Iranian retaliation against regional US allies, this episode argues that US foreign policy is deeply controlled by an 'Anglo-Zionist conspiracy' led by the Rothschild banking dynasty, prioritizing Israeli interests over American ones."

GeopoliticsMiddle East ConflictUS Foreign Policy+2
Larry Johnson: Iran Missiles Rain Down on Northern Israel – Massive Strikes!
Interviews 02Jun 8, 2026

Larry Johnson: Iran Missiles Rain Down on Northern Israel – Massive Strikes!

"Geopolitical analyst Larry Johnson details how Israel's recent strike on an 'empty building' in Beirut triggered direct Iranian missile retaliation, escalating regional tensions and jeopardizing a US-Iran peace deal brokered by Pakistan."

GeopoliticsMiddle East ConflictUS Foreign Policy+2
LIVE: Trump HIDES FROM PUBLIC as US SOLDIER KILLED!!! 6/2/2026
Legal AF PodcastJun 2, 2026

LIVE: Trump HIDES FROM PUBLIC as US SOLDIER KILLED!!! 6/2/2026

"The host exposes alleged government cover-ups regarding military casualties, Trump's unexplained public absence, and questionable political appointments, arguing these reflect a 'regime of loser babies' and a failing foreign policy."

US Foreign PolicyPolitical AccountabilityMilitary Casualties+2