Wife’s Secret ‘Slave Contract’ Exposes Husband’s Horrific Murder

Despite Julene's claims of an intruder, the initial investigation found no signs of forced entry, the security system was functional, and there was no foreign DNA in the house, contradicting her narrative.

Security system functional, no signs of forced entry, no foreign DNA in the house.

The .357 Magnum believed to be the murder weapon was found clean of any DNA or blowback from the point-blank shot, suggesting it was wiped clean after the murder.

The .357 Magnum found on the kitchen floor was clean of DNA or blowback, despite Jeremy being shot at point-blank range.

During her 2013 interview, Julene struggled to recall crucial details about the night of the murder, such as the exact noise that woke her, who locked the house, or the length of the dog chains, which investigators deemed suspicious.

Julene could not recall the exact noise, who locked the house, or details about the dog chains, despite multiple previous interviews.

Neighbors confirmed the Simco's five dogs were known to bark at any commotion, yet no one heard them barking on the night of the murder, undermining the intruder theory.

Neighbors stated the dogs would 'always come flying out if anything was going on' and would bark at commotions, but heard no barking on the night of the murder.

Investigators discovered a 14-page handwritten 'master-slave father-daughter agreement' between Jeremy and Julene. This document raised questions about the consensual nature of their relationship, especially in light of Julene's past trauma of sexual abuse by her father.

A handwritten 14-page 'master-slave father-daughter agreement' was found among the couple's personal files.

Approximately 11 hours before Jeremy's murder, someone used the couple's computer to search for Julene's abusive father's obituary, suggesting a potential psychological trigger or motive for the crime.

Computer forensics revealed a search for Julene's father's obituary at 18:57:03 on November 17, 2009, roughly 11 hours before the 911 call.

The day after Jeremy's death, Julene reported a second break-in where a safe was tampered with and surveillance equipment was missing. A contractor hired to replace the safe believed the damage was staged, noting a fire poker tip was placed in a way that couldn't have been used on that type of safe.

Julene reported a break-in where a safe was tampered with and surveillance was missing; a contractor found a fire poker tip in the safe hinge, which he deemed a 'setup'.

A nurse at the hospital where Julene was taken after the murder recalled Julene initially stating, 'I shot my husband,' before quickly correcting herself to 'My husband was shot.'

A nurse testified that Julene mumbled 'I shot my husband' and then corrected it to 'My husband was shot' when asked to repeat herself.

A professional 911 call analyst identified 10 markers of a guilty caller in Julene's distressed call, including resistance to answer, conflicting facts, and inappropriate sentence order, compared to only four markers of an innocent caller.

A 911 call analyst found 10 markers of a guilty caller in Julene's call, such as resistance to answer, conflicting facts, and inappropriate sentence order.