Quick Read

Lindsey Graham is leveraging his influence with Donald Trump to aggressively push for military interventions across the globe, celebrating regime change and advocating for a broad 'cleaning out' of perceived 'bad guys' without apparent concern for consequences.
Graham is 'having the time of his life' advocating for military interventions in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, and Lebanon.
He influences Trump by framing military action as financially beneficial (e.g., minerals, oil).
Graham's hawkish rhetoric is so extreme it alarms some Republicans, and he dismisses concerns about post-intervention stability.

Summary

The Bulwark hosts discuss Senator Lindsey Graham's fervent advocacy for military intervention, particularly in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, and Lebanon. They highlight Graham's excitement for these actions, framing it as him 'having the time of his life' and fulfilling a long-held desire for interventionism. The hosts argue that Graham manipulates Donald Trump by appealing to Trump's business interests, suggesting financial gains from military actions (e.g., minerals in Afghanistan, oil in Syria/Venezuela). They note that Graham's hawkish rhetoric, including calls to 'blow the hell out of these people' and 'clean out the bad guys,' alarms even some within the Republican party, like Megan McCain, who views it as damaging to the administration's message. The hosts criticize Graham's dismissal of potential negative consequences of regime change, pointing out the historical failures of such interventions and the lack of a clear plan for post-conflict stability. Graham is also shown expanding his targets, advocating for vengeance against Hezbollah in Lebanon for a 1983 attack and admonishing Saudi Arabia for not joining the fight against Iran, demonstrating a willingness to threaten allies.
Lindsey Graham's aggressive interventionist stance, coupled with his apparent influence on Donald Trump, indicates a significant push toward expanded military engagements and regime change operations. This approach risks escalating conflicts, destabilizing regions, and alienating allies, potentially leading to unforeseen long-term consequences and a more volatile global landscape. Understanding Graham's motivations and methods of influencing a former president provides insight into the potential direction of US foreign policy under certain political alignments.

Takeaways

  • Lindsey Graham is enthusiastically advocating for US military intervention in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, and Lebanon.
  • Graham influences Donald Trump by appealing to the former president's business interests, suggesting military actions yield financial gains (e.g., minerals, oil).
  • Graham's rhetoric includes calls to 'blow the hell out of these people' and 'clean out the bad guys,' alarming even some within the Republican party.
  • He dismisses concerns about the negative consequences of regime change, calling it an 'insulting idea' that things could get worse in Iran.
  • Graham is expanding his interventionist targets, calling for vengeance against Hezbollah in Lebanon for a 1983 attack and threatening Saudi Arabia for not joining the fight against Iran.

Insights

1Graham's Interventionist Zeal and Influence on Trump

Lindsey Graham is described as 'having the time of his life' pushing for military interventions in multiple countries, including Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, and Lebanon. The host, Will Salatin, argues that Graham manipulates Donald Trump by appealing to Trump's business-oriented mindset, suggesting that military interventions will lead to financial gains from resources like minerals or oil.

Graham told Trump that keeping troops in Afghanistan would secure valuable minerals (), that intervention in Syria would secure oil (), and that Venezuela offered oil ().

2Dismissal of Post-Intervention Consequences

Graham consistently dismisses concerns about the potential negative outcomes or instability following regime change. He frames the idea that things could get worse after intervention as 'insulting' to the people of the targeted countries, despite historical evidence to the contrary and the hosts' concerns about the lack of a tidy outcome.

Graham stated that it's an 'insulting idea' to suggest things could get worse in Iran after intervention () and that 'peace brings prosperity' after toppling regimes ().

3Expanding Targets and Threatening Allies

Beyond current conflicts, Graham actively advocates for new military engagements, specifically calling for the US to join Israel in attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon to 'avenge' a 1983 Marine barracks bombing. He also publicly admonished and threatened Saudi Arabia for not fully participating in the military effort against Iran, indicating a willingness to challenge US allies.

Graham stated, 'Cuba is next' () and called on Trump to 'join Israel to attack Hezbollah, avenge the Marines' for a 1983 attack (). He also tweeted, 'Why should America do a defense agreement with a country like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that is unwilling to join a fight of mutual interest?' ().

Lessons

  • Monitor Lindsey Graham's public statements and influence on foreign policy, as his hawkish views appear to be a significant driver of potential US military actions.
  • Analyze the rhetoric used to justify military interventions, particularly how economic incentives are framed to appeal to political leaders.
  • Be aware of the historical context and potential long-term consequences of regime change operations, as advocated by figures like Graham, given past failures in similar situations.

Quotes

"

"We're going to blow the hell out of these people. This regime is in a death row now. It is going to be on its knees. It's going to fall. And when it falls, we're going to have peace like no other time. We're gonna have prosperity unlike anyone could ever imagine. Peace brings prosperity. You can't do it by talking."

Lindsey Graham
"

"I have known Lindsey Graham since I was a child. I am imploring anyone who will listen in the Trump administration to stop sending this man out as a surrogate. He is scaring people and doing damage to whatever message you're trying to sell to the American public about the Iran war."

Megan McCain (read by host)
"

"I'm in Miami. You see this hat? Free Cuba. Stay tuned. The liberation of Cuba is upon us. It's just a matter of time now. You see this hat? Make Iran great. President Trump said the only way to make Iran great is for the people to take over. We're marching through the world. We're cleaning out the bad guys."

Lindsey Graham
"

"Ronald Reagan, who I admire and love, withdrew and never did anything about it. So, I'm calling on President Trump today, join Israel to attack Hezbollah, avenge the Marines."

Lindsey Graham

Q&A

Recent Questions

Related Episodes