Rubio ADMITS: ISRAEL DRAGGED US INTO WAR

Marco Rubio and Mike Johnson publicly stated that the US initiated strikes against Iran because an Israeli attack on Iran was imminent, and the US needed to preempt Iranian retaliation against American forces. This narrative frames US involvement as a protective measure for its troops against a secondary threat, rather than a direct response to Iranian aggression.

Rubio and Johnson's statements cited that 'Israel was going to strike Iran no matter what' and that the US 'knew that there was going to be an Israeli action' which 'would precipitate an attack against American forces,' necessitating a US preemptive strike to avoid 'much higher casualties.'

The hosts argue that the admission by US officials signifies a profound loss of US sovereignty. They contend that the world's superpower is being dictated by a smaller 'client state' (Israel), which receives substantial US military aid but cannot be restrained from actions that directly endanger US interests and personnel.

The hosts exclaim, 'Israel was the threat. Israel was... We have sacrificed our sovereignty. We are a non-s sovereign nation,' highlighting the perceived inability of the US to tell Israel 'no' despite providing critical support.

Despite former President Trump's historical reluctance to embroil the US in large-scale Middle East wars, he proceeded with strikes against Iran. The hosts question why the option of cutting off aid or imposing repercussions on Israel was not considered, speculating about powerful, undisclosed influences like the 'Epstein files' or the Israel lobby.

The hosts note Trump's 'resistant reluctance to go into a full-blown war with Iran' yet 'it never seemed to be an option to him to go to Israel and say, “No, we will cut you off.”' They directly ask, 'maybe it is Zapstein files, right? Is it just the money from Miriam Add? Like there's lots of people who give Trump money for his campaign.'

The hosts assert that Israel's objective in the conflict extends beyond deterrence to actively seeking the collapse of the Iranian regime. They cite specific targeting choices and diplomatic efforts as evidence of this goal.

The hosts mention that Israeli strikes are 'going after and blowing up all the police stations,' which is done 'to collapse the civil society border in the country.' They also note efforts to 'get Donald Trump on the phone with a bunch of Kurdish leaders in Iraq and they're like, “Hey, go on in there. Let's let's stoke a little civil war.”'

The situation in the Middle East is rapidly deteriorating, with US embassies under attack and Americans advised to leave multiple countries. The hosts warn that the strategy of supporting an insurgency to destabilize Iran, potentially involving US special forces, is a 'recipe for quagmire, for disaster, for civil war, for collapse.'

The hosts describe 'embassies that are being attacked' and 'Americans now in 12 different countries in the region' being told to 'get out of the region.' They detail how 'US special forces that accompany them on the ground' with Kurds could lead to 'the most wellarmed insurgents in history,' mirroring past disastrous interventions.