Trump Supporter Guest Host SCHOOLS The View As They MELTDOWN Over Trump Bombing Iran!

Elizabeth Hasselbach, on 'The View,' and the host argue that the US strike on Iran is not merely about Israel or domestic distractions, but a strategic geopolitical move. The primary objective is to choke China's oil supply, thereby preventing its global stronghold. This action is framed as a way to weaken China and Russia without direct military confrontation, and to offer hope of freedom to Iranian women by ending a 'disgusting terrorist regime.'

Hasselbach states, 'this is actually avoiding a a boots on the ground war with China when we are able to choke their oil supply... they've now reduced it and choked the oil supply to China in Iran.' The host reiterates, 'It's about Russia. It's about China. It's about resources.'

The host vehemently rejects the idea that the Iran strike is a distraction from the Epstein files or Trump's political standing. He characterizes such claims as 'very low IQ,' asserting that the Trump administration was the most transparent on Epstein, responsible for his initial arrest, and that no 'smoking gun' linking Trump to Epstein has emerged despite millions of documents being released. He argues that war is generally unpopular, making it an unlikely political distraction.

The host states, 'Epstein has become an IQ test... this administration has been the most transparent administration that we've ever had on this topic of Epstein... to say that, oh, what's happening with Iran is only happening as a distraction from Epstein, it's very low IQ.'

The host draws a stark comparison between Trump's leadership and Vladimir Putin's, suggesting that Trump possesses a ruthless decisiveness that Putin lacks. He argues that if Trump were in Putin's position, the Ukraine war would have ended swiftly because Trump would have 'took out everybody' in Ukraine's leadership, similar to how Iran's leadership was 'decapitated.' This portrays Trump as a more effective and brutal leader than Putin, challenging the Western narrative of Russia as a major threat.

The host asks, 'If Trump was in Vladimir Putin's position, do you think that Zalinsky would still be walking around right now? I don't think so.' He adds, 'I think that Trump would have did to Ukraine what we just did to Iran's leadership. I mean, we took out everybody... That's brutal. That is ruthless. I don't think that Putin has that in him.'

Despite the controversy and skepticism surrounding the Iran strike, the host advocates for a 'skeptical but cautiously optimistic' 'wait and see' approach. He believes that public support for the war will ultimately depend on its success and positive outcomes, such as a successful regime change and minimal fallout. He suggests that if successful, these actions would cement Trump's legacy as one of the greatest foreign policy presidents.

The host states, 'I'm in wait and see mode. Right? I'm going to tell you I am skeptical but cautiously optimistic.' Later, 'If it's successful... everybody can agree that it will cement President Trump as one of the greatest presidents of the 21st century.'