The Greatest War Movies Ever Made, According to a Retired General
YouTube · LdhtcW-uC_I
Quick Read
Summary
Takeaways
- ❖War movies, when viewed critically, can be a vital component of self-study for developing leadership skills and understanding military operations.
- ❖The success or failure of military campaigns often hinges on the personalities of commanders and the clarity of strategic objectives, as much as on tactical execution.
- ❖True leadership involves not only technical competence but also the ability to manage chaos, build cohesive teams, and accept full responsibility for outcomes, even in the face of immense personal and moral challenges.
Insights
1Personality and Cognitive Dissonance in Command
The film 'Gettysburg' illustrates how the dynamic personalities of commanders, such as General Lee's cognitive dissonance and adamant decision-making, can critically influence battle outcomes. Lee's belief that his army's will could overcome the Union's material advantage, coupled with constant changes to his campaign plan, ultimately led to disaster for the South.
General Hertling cites 'Gettysburg' as an excellent portrayal of how personalities interact, causing friction or leading to victory/defeat. He specifically mentions Lee's cognitive dissonance and constant plan changes during the Gettysburg campaign.
2The Perils of Over-Optimistic Campaign Planning
Operation Market Garden, depicted in 'A Bridge Too Far,' serves as a cautionary tale about over-optimism in campaign planning. Despite strong tactical leadership, a flawed strategic plan that failed to mitigate risks led to strategic failure, highlighting the burden placed on soldiers when the overarching vision is unsound.
General Hertling explains that 'A Bridge Too Far' shows how Montgomery's plan for Operation Market Garden suffered from over-optimism and a failure to mitigate risk, leading to strategic failure despite tactical sacrifices.
3Small Unit Heroism vs. Unclear Strategic Purpose
Documentaries like 'Restrepo' realistically portray the raw humanity, trust, and tactical mastery of small units in combat. However, they also expose the profound disconnect when exceptional tactical actions are undermined by an unclear or flawed strategic purpose, leading to ultimate failure despite individual heroism.
General Hertling notes 'Restrepo's' realistic depiction of small unit adaptation, peer leadership, and constant combat, but emphasizes the 'so what?' question when a bad strategy makes tactical actions ineffective, leading to failure.
4The Critical Role of Intelligence in Modern Warfare
'Zero Dark Thirty' highlights the indispensable role of intelligence-based operations in contemporary military campaigns. It demonstrates the relentless focus, institutional endurance, and complex fusion of intelligence agencies with military forces required to achieve critical objectives, a dynamic unseen in previous wars.
General Hertling praises 'Zero Dark Thirty' for showing how the US military uses intelligence-based operations, the relentless focus of CIA agents like Maya, and the extremely close relationship between intelligence agencies and military forces, which he experienced in Iraq.
5The Complexities of Fratricide and Battlefield Perspectives
'Courage Under Fire' uniquely explores the devastating impact of fratricide (friendly fire) and the subjective nature of battlefield narratives. It portrays how different perspectives, egos, and the inherent confusion of combat can lead to accidental deaths and moral injuries, further complicated by political pressures to control the narrative.
General Hertling chose 'Courage Under Fire' because it haunts him, reflecting real-life fratricide incidents he witnessed. He highlights the difficulty of situational awareness in tanks, the multiple perspectives of the battlefield, and the political desire to control the narrative around such incidents, referencing the Pat Tillman case.
6Adapting to Chaos: Tactical Leadership in Crisis
Films like 'Blackhawk Down' and 'We Were Soldiers' showcase unbelievable courage and commitment when tactical plans unravel in chaotic environments. They demonstrate how highly competent, well-trained soldiers, led by masterful unit leadership, can adapt to unexpected, degraded conditions and extract forces from crisis.
General Hertling combines 'Blackhawk Down' and 'We Were Soldiers' for their shared lessons on tactical execution coming 'unglued' due to unexpected fire and degraded conditions. He praises the 'unbelievable courage and commitment' and 'masterful' unit leadership in adapting to chaos.
7Leadership as 'Tough Love' for Unit Effectiveness
'12 O'Clock High' is presented as the gold standard for leadership teaching, illustrating that true caring for soldiers sometimes means being a 'prick' to instill discipline and high standards. This rigorous approach, though initially unpopular, ultimately ensures unit cohesion and saves lives on the battlefield.
General Hertling uses '12 O'Clock High' in MBA classes to teach leadership. He describes Gregory Peck's character as a 'hard-nosed commander' who appears as a 'prick' but whose high standards and driven training ultimately make the unit combat effective and save lives.
8Strategic Leadership: Coalition Building and Ultimate Responsibility
'Ike: Countdown to D-Day' exemplifies the immense challenges of strategic leadership, particularly in building multinational coalitions. Eisenhower's role required strategic influence, tough decision-making, and the singular burden of responsibility for a massive, complex operation, including preparing for failure.
General Hertling praises Tom Selleck's portrayal of Eisenhower, highlighting his calm strategic leadership in pulling together a coalition (British, French, Poles) and making tough decisions. He emphasizes Eisenhower's mission to 'Enter to the continent of Europe and defeat the Nazi war machine' and his preparation of two letters, one taking fault if D-Day failed.
9The Comprehensive Spectrum of Leadership Lessons
The 'Band of Brothers' series offers an exhaustive curriculum on leadership, covering every facet from communication and character to discipline, caring for soldiers, managing fear, and navigating ethical dilemmas. Each episode provides distinct examples of effective and ineffective leadership in a combat environment.
General Hertling states 'Band of Brothers' is number two on his list because 'every single leadership lesson that you need to teach' can be found in its episodes, from communication and toxic leadership to training, standards, discipline, and managing fear and anxiety.
10The Unvarnished Reality of Combat and the Call to 'Earn This'
'Saving Private Ryan' stands as the pinnacle of war movies for its unparalleled combat realism and its exploration of the diverse human experiences within a combat squad. It culminates in the profound message to 'Earn this,' underscoring the immense sacrifice of soldiers and the moral imperative for those who survive to live lives worthy of that sacrifice.
General Hertling calls the first 22 minutes of 'Saving Private Ryan' the 'best representation on film of any combat sequence I've seen,' noting its realism and the experiences of young men. He highlights Captain Miller's 'Earn this' message to Private Ryan and his personal connection to a 104-year-old D-Day veteran who said the film was 'worse than what they portrayed.'
Lessons
- Cultivate resilience by intentionally stepping outside your comfort zone and confronting fears, whether in public speaking or leading a team, to better manage chaos and crisis.
- Develop a multi-faceted leadership approach by focusing on clear communication (speaking and listening), strong character, intellectual growth, and the ability to build and steward effective teams.
- Understand the critical distinction between small-unit tactical actions and overarching strategic objectives; ensure your efforts align with a clear, well-defined 'why' to avoid wasted sacrifice and effort.
Quotes
"In the military, they tell us that we have to learn leadership through a through a three-legged stool. The one leg is what you learn in the schoolhouse. The next leg is what you learn through experiences in your operational assignment. And the third leg is what you learn from self-study. And I consider watching war movies and reading books a self-study."
"You can have a great army doing wonderful things under great tactical and operational leadership but if the strategic plan is not nailed down and if you haven't kind of mitigated the risk, you're placing a whole lot of burden on those who serve for an endstate that doesn't come about."
"When I go home, people will ask me, 'Hey, Hoot, why do you do it, man? What are you, some kind of war junkie?' You know what I'll say? I won't say a goddamn word. Why? They won't understand. They won't understand why we do it. They won't understand that it's about the men next to you. And that's it. That's all it is."
"Sometimes the most intense method of caring is to treat them rough, to make sure that they're abiding by standards, that the standards have been instilled, that they're training hard. And the reason you're doing that is for the long term. You want your soldiers to survive on the battlefield."
"As the D-Day landing was about to begin, he wrote two letters. one which was a basically a congratulatory letter and the other one was taking the fault if everything failed. So he was ready to say, 'Hey, I made some bad calls. It's all my fault.' That's something that really takes a dedicated, selfless leader to do."
"I've got a box on my desk... it's got the pictures of 253 soldiers that I lost under my command in combat... every day on the top of the box it has a phrase that says make it matter. That was something General Dempsey said. That make it matter is the equivalent of what Captain Miller said to Private Ryan at the end of Saving Private Ryan when he pulled him in close and he said, 'Earn this. Earn this.'"
Q&A
Recent Questions
Related Episodes

BREAKING: Trump REJECTS Iran Deal - Panic In IRGC - U.S. Military & IDF Plan War
"President Trump rejected Iran's latest deal proposal, labeling it 'unacceptable,' while the US and Israel reportedly planned military strikes and Saudi Arabia urged the US to 'destroy the regime,' signaling a major escalation in Middle East tensions."

"A Deal With BARBARIANS!" Scott Horton FIERY Debate On Iran War & Trump | With John Bolton
"This fiery debate dissects the US-Israel strategy towards Iran, featuring John Bolton's call for regime change and Scott Horton's scathing critique of US foreign policy and Israel's actions."

IHIP News: Stephen Miller CRACKING Under Pressure As His EVIL Plan BLOWS UP In His FACE!
"Paula Ramos, an Emmy-winning journalist, dissects the complex political landscape of Latino voters, revealing how right-wing tactics exploit cultural conservatism and the psychological impact of anti-immigrant rhetoric, even on those who support Trump."

Trump's War Could Cost Him EVERYTHING (w/ Nicholas Kristof) | The Bulwark Podcast
"Nicholas Kristof and Tim Miller dissect the catastrophic geopolitical and economic fallout of the Iran war, arguing it has weakened US strategic positions, empowered hardline regimes, and exacerbated global crises, all while highlighting the domestic political implications for the US."